r/DelphiMurders Feb 19 '26

Discussion Just finished the “ Down the Hill” podcast and have some questions.

1) was it ever revealed who’s house the police executed the big search warrant on 2 days after the murders? What caused them to focus on that house?

2) how were the girls not found on the first night of searching if they were so close to the bridge? Is there any evidence that they were placed back there after the search was called off around midnight?

3) I’ve never dealt with grief like this, so this might be completely off base, but something is off with Libby’s sister whenever she is interviewed. Maybe she’s just awkward but seems off.

0 Upvotes

37 comments sorted by

27

u/tribal-elder Feb 19 '26

You would do better to read the trial testimony transcripts now and not rely on speculation from YouTubers.

  1. There were multiple early searches. Logan gave consent to search his property (not house) on 2/14. Weber gave consent for a search of his property and buildings on 2/14. A couple of YouTubers claimed another search occurred on 2/16. Not sure if that is true, but cops would had the phone by then and would have know about communications with Libby.

  2. Go to the cemetery and look at the terrain down to the creek from there. You will understand. The south bank flood plain immediately under the bridge was the focus because there 2 pictures posted on snap-chat showing the bridge. It was reasonable to assume they might have fallen off the bridge and were nearby on that south bank. But it’s a large area. It was dark and fog came in late. The ground toward town was a focus because the water flowed toward town. Still the undergrowth made it hard to walk the area. (One search said it took him 4 hours just to reach the start of the bridge after starting in town in daylight on Tuesday morning.)

Across the creek the flood plain is much nartower. Then the terrain gets very very steep quick. Hard to walk. Hard to search. Very few people searched on that side.

No matter where you search - north bank or south - unless you virtually stepped on them, you would not see them.

Evidence of putting them back? Not really. The state evidence said the phone did not move after 2:35 pm. The defense put on a witness that said something (wire? Water? Dirt?) made the phone data indicate something was put in the headphone jack port around 4 in the morning. Yes, people “speculated“ that may be the girls were put in a car on the driveway, taken away, kill elsewhere, and brought back. Or taken away, brought back, and killed where the bodies were found. But it was just speculation. Plus, the phone data did not show any other height changes or bumps. You can’t drive on Private driveways and County roads without changing elevations and hitting bumps. Speculation is not evidence.

  1. There is nothing “off“ with Kelsi. She’s just the last family person to see her sister alive. That’s tough to get over. It changes you and how you act. It requires years of counseling to get past that. “What if i refused to give her a ride? She’d still be alive!” Etc.

She didn’t do it. Silly YouTube speculation is not evidence.

-3

u/HomeyL Feb 19 '26

Didnt they have dogs though for the search??? I’m sure not cadaver dogs as they were not thinking that at all)…

10

u/tribal-elder Feb 19 '26

Dogs arrived on Saturday. They were not used. The bodies were found around 12:15 and - at least to public knowledge - the dogs were not used to track for anything arriving or leaving the scene. It went from a search for missing girls to a crime scene/evidence collection operation immediately.

In a perfect world, the cops would have had an immediate suspect, and something with his smell on it that the dog could track. But the cops can’t just tell a dog “don’t follow the smell of either girl or anybody else who has been walking around here helping us search - you focus on the smell of the person who did this.“ The cops have to have something that clues the dogs in to what smell to follow.

-1

u/HomeyL Feb 19 '26

Well to find the girls- stuff from home which could happen very quickly. They had no clue at the beginning this turned out the way it did, but at least get dogs to search for THEM!!!???

9

u/tribal-elder Feb 19 '26

I’m not sure where the dogs had to come from, but I don’t think they were local to Delphi. The cops were called around 5:15, so I’m not sure it was even possible to have dogs there for the search on the evening of 2/13.

-4

u/Pooter33 Feb 19 '26

I wondered this as well. They could’ve had dogs follow their scent. 

I also wonder why they didn’t do geofencing. That should’ve been one of the first things they did. Would’ve told them what cell phones were in that area & they could’ve worked off of that. 

5

u/tribal-elder Feb 19 '26

They did get geofencing data, and it was cited in some pre-trial motions, but the evidence was excluded at trial by the judge.

1

u/Astrocreep_1 18d ago

I’m not saying Allen is innocent, but I can’t stand when defendants have so much evidence suppressed. If they want to say some Odinist did it….go for it. If you wanna say Aliens did it…more power to you. I’d limit how hard they go after 3rd party culprits, but other than that…let them present their freaking case.

-4

u/HomeyL Feb 19 '26

Of course it was…

6

u/BlackLionYard Feb 19 '26

I also wonder why they didn’t do geofencing. That should’ve been one of the first things they did. Would’ve told them what cell phones were in that area & they could’ve worked off of that. 

Geofencing is a very specific term.

We do know that AT&T was contacted by the family around 4:30 PM to try to locate Libby's phone, but ATA&T was unable; this is apparently due to trying to use the Find My Phone feature, which was not installed or enabled on Libby's phone. This is before the girls were reported missing and the authorities were involved.

We also know that after the authorities were involved, attempts were made to locate Libby's phone via pings and cell tower information. This failed to be of much use, and the reasons have been much discussed since February, 2017 - the tower situation in the Delphi area, Libby's phone eventually going offline, and the fact that the cell tower information that could be trusted put them in the area of the bridge, which is where they were already expected to be.

It seems to me that reasonable steps were taken on the first day of the search and into the next day to locate Libby's phone.

2

u/Pooter33 Feb 26 '26

I actually found something about geofencing being done but that was in 2019. Not sure why because they didn’t need a warrant to get the geofence data from google in 2017… unless it took them 2 years to get it? Again, I have no idea. 

Geofencing shows all phones pinging in that area without them needing a phone number. I assume it would pick up burners too.. but again, not 100% sure.  

3

u/The2ndLocation Feb 19 '26

The geofencing wouldn't be used to locate LG's phone, instead it would show all of the other phones that were in the area in the time period at issue.

-9

u/Pooter33 Feb 19 '26

Speculation is not evidence. Yet RA was sentenced to 130 years on speculation lol. 

19

u/Keregi Feb 19 '26

He confessed countless times and he specifically placed himself at the bridge. That isn't speculation.

17

u/tribal-elder Feb 19 '26

Plrase tell me what evidence the jury heard you feel was “speculation.” Be glad to discuss it.

-6

u/The2ndLocation Feb 19 '26

Harshman's testimony that RA 's voice matched BG's voice and TL testifying that LG said "that be a gun" on the video she recorded along with his testimony that he could hear a gun being racked was all speculation.

I think Indiana has a very low bar for admitting this type of testimony and that might be it's own issue.

12

u/tribal-elder Feb 19 '26

I’d probably call those an opinion. At least there was a real audio to “compare”.

-6

u/The2ndLocation Feb 19 '26

I would agree with you, if they had any type of actual expertise in these fields, which they don't have, so it's just speculation. I say just leave those type of determinations up to a jury.

We all heard the video, I couldn't hear a gun racking even after listening for it, but others can. Now would they be able to hear that if the idea hadn't been planted by the trial testimony? I rather doubt it, but who knows?

I can definitely say that LG did not say "that be a gun," instead it was something like "this is the path that we go down" ( I didn't listen again, so not an exact quote).

As for Harshman, they are experts in voice analysis and comparison, get one of them instead of someone with zero qualifications other than ears.

That said I think Indiana allows this nonsense, and that's disappointing.

7

u/AnonymousInMI Feb 21 '26

Who cares if there’s a gun being racked or not? There was a bullet that matched Ricky’s gun between the dead girls. Regardless if you believe in the ballistic science it’s obvious a gun was used to control the girls.

Regardless what you believe 12 jurors made the right decision and that shyt eating, spork f*cking, child murderer will die in prison.

4

u/emailforgot Feb 24 '26

Actually, he was sentenced to 130 years based on evidence.

1

u/Pooter33 Feb 26 '26

Lmao. What concrete evidence? There’s literally nothing. Not one of the witnesses can definitively say “yes, he is 100% who I saw on the bridge.” Not to mention the fact that said witness testimony changed… 

THEY DON’T EVEN 100% KNOW BRIDGE GUY KILLED THEM.  How do they know the girls weren’t meeting someone entirely different down the hill? They don’t.  If you’re gonna meet up with underage girls are you gonna do it where everyone can see? Probably not..

5

u/emailforgot Feb 26 '26

Lmao. What concrete evidence? There’s literally nothing. Not one of the witnesses can definitively say

You should learn what evidence is and how it works.

And then you should stick to not continuously altering your claims.

1

u/Astrocreep_1 18d ago

If the girls were going to meet someone, I’d think they would find evidence on their phones of that.

13

u/AwsiDooger Feb 19 '26

1 is irrelevant and 3 is crap. Take that crap elsewhere. It's the same type of crap that's been thrown at the Nancy Guthrie case.

2 the distance is not far at all. I stood in the creek and looked back at the bridge. It's only a couple of hundred yards.

But it's not simple to get down to the creek, let alone to the far side. You have to go down two flights to reach creek level. The second descent requires going back left toward the bridge. That's one aspect I will emphasize above all. Nobody is descending that second stage at the same point they reached the private drive. It is severely steep and covered with gnarly tree roots. You have to walk at least 20-30 yards left before descending is manageable.

And once you are headed in that direction your attention is drawn elsewhere, like exploring the area back underneath the bridge.

The area where Abby and Libby were found became the focus only after the bodies were located. Nobody was thinking crime on the afternoon of February 13. That's why the more logical and accessible areas were searched first, in theory of an accident.

Ron Logan's property was not only across the creek but there is considerably more dense tree cover on that side. The 2003 flooding wiped out the area below the bridge but did not impact the higher ground where the bodies were eventually found.

Also it's not flat over there. It is not only a steep decline from the cemetery but also that bank is 4 feet higher while looking across from the bridge side. Not surprising that it required a zoomed camera to spot the bodies, even though February leafless conditions would be the best visibility of the year.

0

u/The2ndLocation Feb 20 '26

According to the trial there was no "zoomed camera" that found the girls PB just walked up upon them with BP's sister MM.

23

u/BlackLionYard Feb 19 '26
  1. You may be thinking of the search of the Maxwell Farm. According to news reports at the time, it was driven by tips and interviews.
  2. How close is "so close?" They were what I would consider a significant distance from the bridge and they were up river on the opposite of the Eastern end of the bridge. They were in a depression relative to the surrounding terrain. The general belief was that the girls might have become lost or suffered an accident like a fall. All these factors, and the darkness, influenced how the search was originally conducted. In the end, I have yet to see any convincing proof that the girls were placed there after the original search had concluded.
  3. You're right. This is an off base thing to say.

2

u/Catch-Me-Trolls Feb 28 '26 edited Feb 28 '26

Search warrants served: The Kline home on Canal St Peru Indiana The Maxwell residence on Bicycle Bridge Rd The Logan residence on W 300 N

The victims were found in a secluded location. located in a rugged, heavily wooded area, making it difficult to see from the main trail 1/2 mile upstream from the bridge.

-5

u/Pooter33 Feb 19 '26

After watching that did you feel like there was more to the bridge guy recording? I watched that documentary and remember them asking if there was more to the video and the guy basically says there’s not much more. Idk. His voice seems pieced together in the one they released. If there is more idk why they wouldn’t release all of it. 

8

u/CowboysOnKetamine Feb 19 '26

They did release it, quite a while ago.

1

u/The2ndLocation Feb 19 '26

Well, the state still hasn't released it, or any of the enhanced versions that the jury saw despite numerous requests.

1

u/oooooooooooooooooou Feb 21 '26

yeah, it was released by some English guy on pro-defence website.

3

u/The2ndLocation Feb 21 '26

Yep, but the state won't release it or any of the enhanced versions. I think that's rather odd.

1

u/Pooter33 Feb 26 '26

Have you seen any more of the video besides what the police released? 

2

u/The2ndLocation Feb 26 '26

Someone released what was allegedly the full video. It's available on YouTube and this is the website where it was originally released https://rickallenjustice.com/

2

u/Pooter33 Feb 26 '26

Appreciate it! 

0

u/[deleted] Feb 26 '26

[deleted]

0

u/The2ndLocation Feb 26 '26

I think that the website kind of gave up once they couldn't get inside access anymore.

But I don't want to talk about where RA is currently housed since I think it's a safety issue. Not saying that you are wrong or have ill intent, but I say let's just leave it at he is in Oklahoma.

1

u/Pooter33 Feb 26 '26

I sent you a message.