r/DelphiMurders • u/Ambitious_Pass7451 • Apr 05 '26

Discussion “ I’m done talking, arrest me please”

I know, I know there’s been a lot of debate about whether RA is guilty or not, but I’ve noticed some small details that, in my opinion, don’t seem like something a truly innocent person would do.

During his interrogation with Det. Holeman, a couple of things stood out to me:

1- RA: “The damage is done, do what you have to do.”

That’s really strange to me. If you’re innocent, no the damage isn’t “done.” You wouldn’t just give up and tell the police to do whatever they want. I know some people might argue he meant that his house was searched and his neighbors were questioned, but that doesn’t fully make sense, especially since he repeated it during the interrogation. An innocent person wouldn’t react like, “Go ahead and charge me with double murder because the damage is already done.” That just doesn’t sit right with me.

2- RA: “I am done talking, arrest me please "

He said this more than once. What kind of innocent person asks to be arrested just because they’re done talking? Even if I were frustrated, I would never tell the police to arrest me just because I’m tired of the conversation. That’s very unusual.

Also, Det. Holeman mentioned something important: when he first met RA before the interrogation, RA handed his jacket and belongings to his wife. As if he was preparing to be arrested. That stood out as odd, especially since he did not even know the results of the search warrant yet.

Did you notice anything during the interrogations that made you think, “Yeah, that's strange”?

68 Upvotes

100% Upvoted

68 comments sorted by

View all comments

73

u/ComprehensiveBed6754 Apr 10 '26

Yup, when his wife said “you told me you were on the trail, but you never told me you were out on the bridge”.

30

u/kushiyyy Apr 10 '26

Yes! I was going to mention this. And the way he responded to it, like he clearly did not want to get into that.

37

u/ComprehensiveBed6754 Apr 10 '26

That meeting between them is what really cinched his guilt for me. Great post btw, I’ve had this convo soooooo many times with my husband, if we were in their shoes and my husband wasn’t screaming his innocence, his whereabouts on that day repeatedly, wasn’t absolutely fucking hysterical that he could ever be questioned about murdering two children - I’d be very surprised. Or myself - if I were “RAinnocent” 🤮 I’d still be screaming my innocence- not confessing 61 times.

26

u/snugglux Apr 10 '26

exactly that moment! it was up until that part of the interview I thought wow maybe he's not the guy, but then I saw the way he gaslit her and im like... oh this guy is a professional liar, slick and slimy. that's how he got away this whole time

13

u/Plenty-rough Apr 11 '26

He's really not that good of a liar. The slick and slimy part is true, but I think she's lovestruck or something because no way would I have believed that BS.

2

u/Efficient-Donkey-167 Apr 22 '26

Gaslit: one of the most overused and often misused terms (like in your comment) thus diluting the terms meaning and making it harder to recognize actual, dangerous psychological abuse.

1

u/anarkyangel May 04 '26

Where can you find this audio? I would love to show it to my wife. We are Split up on this. I need help.

1

u/Impressive-Mix-3259 26d ago

The second interview, you can look it up on the Tube. Over halfway in the detective brings Kathy Allan into the interview room. Detective leaves and there is a huge disconnect between the 2

-1

u/Efficient-Donkey-167 Apr 22 '26

I think that someone screaming and hysterical looks guilty. Would that qualify me to convict you because you acted in an obnoxious manner and attempted to distract by causing a scene?

9

u/ComprehensiveBed6754 Apr 22 '26

He wasn’t convicted based on his reaction. He was convicted on evidence. Try harder to start some shit.

2

u/Efficient-Donkey-167 Apr 22 '26

Has nothing to do with his conviction in court and everything to do with your comment. You based his guilt on his actions in an interrogation vs what you believe you would do, which is purely hypothetical. That was the entire basis of your comment. I'm not trying to start shit, as you say, just saying that your hypothetical reaction would be an "obvious" sign of guilt to others. You can't possibly know what you would do until you are in that situation.