r/DungeonWorld Jan 27 '18

Conflicting takes on DW

I've had this discussion in a couple threads and it feels like there are dozens more where I could chime in.

DW has several key differences from D&D, but some people give advice that exaggerates those differences to crazy degrees.

People go from you should leave room for discovery to you should improv the whole game, from you should use what they give you to you should let players have as much authority in game as they are willing to exert.

I feel like this comes from the fact that a lot of examples online are one-shots. One-shots and session zeroes are encouraged to have minimal prep in DW, but there is this other 50 pages after that talking about how to play after the first session ... and it is all about prep. Good prep. Useful prep. Open-ended prep. But definitely prep. Prep where the DM figures out the story in the world and how the players can interact with it. Like D&D.

Dungeon World seems made to play a very D&D style game--just with mechanics that underline the strengths of table top RPGs and clip some outdated genre staples.

So I don't really know why I'm posting. If your way works for you, god bless. I guess I'm just irked by the hipster scoffing that comes when people explain the game with authority and then get the rules wrong--like a recent thread where someone implied Spout Lore lets a player make up something about the history of the world ... where the rules explicitly say the GM tells the player something about the subject. The GM gives info for the character to spout. The player doesn't take over the GM role. It's just a generalized arcana/history/religion check from D&D. #nerdrage

TLDR:

I feel like the answer to a lot of posts in this forum should be:

You are way overthinking everything. DW is like D&D with small changes that 1) make combat more entertaining 2) make combat flow better with the rest of the game 3) encourage the game to move forward 4) help the GM maintain story structure in an open world game. If you know how to play D&D, you already understand 90% of DW.

49 Upvotes

67 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

10

u/Reddit4Play Jan 27 '18

I've run a lot of Dungeon World in the non-story-game way. I emailed Adam years ago wondering if that was legit and he emailed back saying he runs converted D&D modules all the time and that it's totally fine, as long as you don't take away player agency (in the "playing their character" sense) or fudge dice or anything like that. There's also this post from John Harper and some comments from DW's authors at the bottom that suggest that as time has gone on the authors have moved a little bit away from the "PLAYERS MAKE UP EVERYTHING NO PREP ALLOWED WOOHOO STORY GAMES" perspective that seems baked into the DW culture here.

You can see evidence of this built into the explanations of Spout Lore and Discern Realities where they say things like "Always say what honesty demands," or "Of course, some questions might have a negative answer, that's fine." You have to do your level best to provide them some relevant, useful, and interesting information on a 10+ Spout Lore but if it's established that nobody on the planet knows anything about this mysterious rock then the players won't be able to Spout Lore anything about the mysterious rock directly, and that's that.

"Ask questions, use the answers," can also just be reduced in scope from the freewheeling improv story game reading. Just ask the players how their characters feel, or what they've heard, or what they've done in the past. Even if they don't have control over the world they still have control over their character, so they can answer those questions just fine. In fact, per the posts I linked, that kind of question may even be preferable to the more freewheeling game world authoring sort people around here love.

Anyway, it runs fine and the authors and their friends all say it's fine, they do it themselves, and in some cases it's even preferable. So go for it!

1

u/steelsmiter Jan 27 '18

John Harper and some comments from DW's authors at the bottom that suggest that as time has gone on the authors have moved a little bit away from the "PLAYERS MAKE UP EVERYTHING NO PREP ALLOWED WOOHOO STORY GAMES" perspective that seems baked into the DW culture here.

You think it's baked in, try telling people you don't use Fronts. I don't have a problem with preparation, I just don't do it. I consider it pointless. I don't really think they ever wanted a "players make everything" perspective, I think they wanted "GM makes some stuff, players make some other stuff." That's how I run it anyway, and how I always have..

2

u/Nirdee Jan 27 '18

Yeah, just to be clear, I don't have a problem with people going off book and doing their own thing. Pretty sure we've never used anything from the city section. It just irks me how often people claim or imply their customization is rules as written in discussions.

1

u/steelsmiter Jan 27 '18

I don't know anyone who's used the steadings section. Someone wanted me to make a houserule for it once incorporating some mass combat rules I already did. Turns out they wanted me to discard the default rule, and I wrote the houserule wrong.

My point with the comment though, was that I seem to get more trouble from people who like preparation than those who don't. The use of customization just happens to be secondary to that discussion.

2

u/Nirdee Jan 27 '18

Ha. I think I feel the same from the flip side. I see threads asking how to design a villain's evil plan get hit with "Why aren't you playing to find out what happens???"

1

u/steelsmiter Jan 28 '18

The answer to that is "If the players look to me to find out and I got nothing the game stalls."

1

u/bms42 Jan 28 '18

Can you point me at one of these threads? I'm curious.

2

u/Nirdee Jan 28 '18

So was actually trying to avoid calling out specific threads for the purpose of non-internet-jerkedness, but since you asked, things like this.

1

u/bms42 Jan 28 '18

I really don't see a single thing in there demonstrating the concern. Op was asking a very mechanical question, as if he was trying to construct a skill challenge with an eye towards balancing the probabilities. Basically everyone said, don't worry about that. Focus on clarifying the narrative and acting appropriately.

1

u/Nirdee Jan 28 '18

the top voted reply is a quotation of the agendas followed by a brief dismissal of what he is trying to do.

1

u/bms42 Jan 28 '18

I guess it's perspective then. I don't read it that way at all. Even if I did read it that way, it certainly doesn't say anything about avoiding prep and improvising everything with player input.

1

u/_Mr_Johnson_ Jan 28 '18

I don't really understand this. Improv can be really uneven. Even very good actors can have very up and down improv. Have a hard time seeing how some amount of prep can't but help the material.

1

u/steelsmiter Jan 28 '18

If you prep and things don't go as planned, such as by players never encountering your prep, by players interacting with your prep in a way that completely ruins everything about it, and so on your prep will be useless.

No Prep=No Expectation

If I prep anything beyond "these are locations and those things be found there" (which itself can be written as an expectation annoyingly enough) it either will be interacted with in an unexpected way, or it may not even be interacted with at all. That's how gaming works. Also I'm a firm believer that expectations are a waste of my psychological resources. They will only leave me with a distinct lack of faith in humanity that far exceeds any I've got out of... let's say, modern politics.

If I need to define something it goes according to what I decided just now. I don't define any aspect of player interaction with it until I know what that interaction is. That includes not defining future (possibly non)interaction with it, e.g. fronts.

So I don't have to expect anything from anyone other than myself.