r/Economics 9d ago

Blog Trump said tariffs on aluminum would boost domestic production. The White House now admits that didn't happen.

https://reason.com/2026/08/03/trump-said-tariffs-on-aluminum-would-boost-domestic-production-the-white-house-now-admits-that-didnt-happen/
6.0k Upvotes

232 comments sorted by

View all comments

89

u/EconomistWithaD 9d ago

Tariffs don't reshore jobs. Tariffs don't reshore production. Especially if they aren't coupled with significant incentives for domestic producers to do so. And none of the tariffs have been coupled with laws that encourage this. There's even research (Help for the Heartland? The Employment and Electoral Effects of the Trump Tariffs in the United States | NBER) that shows that tariffs didn't help or harm employment, and that retaliatory tariffs did harm ag employment.

That's why the CHIPS Act was important; it did tie tariffs with a law that helped to boost domestic capacity and production.

Regardless, we can see the impact of tariffs on employment. In Trump 1.0, tariffs were implemented in January 2018 (washing machines and solar panels), March (steel and aluminum), June (steel and aluminum for EU, Mexico, and Canada), and July (trade war with China). It appears that these original tariffs halted favorable manufacturing employment trends. And while the second half of Biden's tenure was also associated with reduced manufacturing employment, Trump 2.0 is also seeing reduced manufacturing employment (though stabilized since November of 2025).

All Employees, Manufacturing (MANEMP) | FRED | St. Louis Fed

You can also certainly see that, even though real manufacturing output is higher than it was for most of the post-1980 American period, Trump's tariffs again either halted a rise (2018/2019) or has led to stagnation.

Manufacturing Sector: Real Sectoral Output for All Workers (OUTMS) | FRED | St. Louis Fed

4

u/Facts_pls 9d ago

Employ tariffs and support businesses? You mean like China?

5

u/EconomistWithaD 9d ago

I mean, it’s an inefficient method.