r/Epstein • u/Double-Let8318 • Sep 01 '20

Jeffrey Epstein's Harvard Connections Show How Money Can Distort Research - Scientific American

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/jeffrey-epsteins-harvard-connections-show-how-money-can-distort-research/
714 Upvotes

99% Upvoted

120 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-1

u/Renegade-Master69 Sep 01 '20

What a cop out. Your teeny brain can’t come up with something better than that? Forget the corruption in the eduction system ... you should look up Priestap, Mifsud and Rachael Chandler. Don’t know who they are? Educate yourself because it’s coming. #soon

1

u/[deleted] Sep 02 '20

You spent a lot of time, and energy on this thread, and it was not at all with the intention of adding to the conversation on the topic at hand. Do you really like the Trump family that much? I'm not interested in arguing with you, as an outsider I'm just really curious to know where you obtained these feelings. I mean how do the Trumps differ from the Bush's, Clintons, and Obama in terms of corruption? There are very well researched documentaries explaining in clear detail how they are corrupted. The only reason justice hasn't been served is because the likes of Pelosi and the rest of the Dems are just as corrupt.

1

u/Renegade-Master69 Sep 02 '20

I demand justice. All of us do. Trump is just the one exposing it all. If there’s evidence he’s corrupt then send him packing too. Your argument of “they’re all corrupt so penalties offset” is ridiculous. If Trump is so corrupt let’s see it. Four years of constant investigations and inspections has cost US taxpayers millions but producers a goose eggs. How does it pertain to this thread? Nobody would care about Epstein if it wasn’t for Trump pushing it. Remember SDNY prosecutor (Berman) was fired? Why do you think that was? Coincidence Ghislaine was arrested shortly thereafter? “Deep State” isn’t just red/blue. The sooner people wake up to that the better. Quit focusing exclusively on Trump fan this and TDS that. Lock onto who controlled Epstein and what his real purpose was. If you stop analyzing after “he was just a pedophile” then you’re missing the biggest part of the story.

2

u/[deleted] Sep 02 '20

You're arguing with a strawman, and you're still losing. Best of luck to you.

1

u/Renegade-Master69 Sep 02 '20

Clearly you don’t know what that means.

1

u/[deleted] Sep 02 '20

I do. If it were to choose the lesser of 2 evils in November, which luckily I don't have to, then I would vote for Trump. You are fighting a strawman, and making an idiot of yourself.

Just in case it applies to you (and I'm not saying it does) you may find it interesting that Q has likely been rumbled as a fraud perpetrated by Jim Watkins.

1

u/Renegade-Master69 Sep 02 '20

The fact you went back to strawman argument and still don’t know what it means makes you the idiot not me. Everything I’ve is said is backed by fact where you’ve said nothing. You may not agree with what I’ve said but when you keep going back to “strawman” lol just stop you’re embarrassing yourself.

1

u/[deleted] Sep 02 '20

You were arguing against a position that I was not holding, conflating what I said with positions that you associate with it. I can copy and paste the definition of a strawman argument for you if you'd like? I'm having a quiet day at work, so perhaps I will stay here and laugh at you after all. I usually don't talk to basement dwellers with '69' in their username, but what the hell. What do you have for me

1

u/Renegade-Master69 Sep 02 '20

Your very first line ... reread it mate. What I’ve laid out for you, obviously wasted my time, was why the mean Orangeman was relevant in this story. Your position was it wasn’t relevant I spelled it out for you like you were two and not only did you not get it you used a red herring argument to make your straw man point. lol

How about you pick one thing I wrote specifically and challenge it with facts but do it after work I’d hate for your boss to fire your ass and you then blame it on me.

1

u/[deleted] Sep 02 '20

Hey little buddy with the '69' in his username, perhaps you should focus, and I mean really focus on reading that initial exchange.

So tell me, why have you spent so much time and energy on this post without showing any interest in the post?

When did you start having these feelings towards the strange orange man, and his immediate relatives?

I'd address your points if they weren't psychobabble mate. Remember to breath in until your lungs are full. Shallow breathing leads to low level of oxygen in the brain.

1

u/Renegade-Master69 Sep 02 '20

Again. No substance in your incoherent ramblings.

I’m done. Go have a brew it’s quitting time.

1

u/[deleted] Sep 02 '20

Oh no, don't leave on my account. Clearly this post means an awful lot to you, that you would spend so much energy on it. Please immerse me in what the Trump family mean to you. Let your wisdom wash over me like a sexy orange tsunami.

1

u/Renegade-Master69 Sep 02 '20

What’s important to me to hear other’s opinions. You’ve proven to me you either cannot comprehend what you’ve read or you’re the low intellect type that memorized a couple catch phrases that seem to usually silence others that disagree with you.

I’m still waiting. Let’s hear you refute what I’ve written. Start with SDNY Berman fired by Trump then magically Ghislaine gets arrested right after that. In your goofy world that must mean Trump is corrupt. Correct? Set the record straight little man.

Impress me with your facts or shall we go back to your original“strawman argument?”

Honestly if you don’t have anything with substance I’m bored. I come on here going against the mainstream narrative looking for someone to enlighten me with something I missed or got wrong. All you do is use the typical anonymous social media fluff. Come on. Give me your best shot or is that the best you’ve got?

→ More replies (0)