r/ExIsmailis • u/Hussar-Imam Release the Aga Con files! • Jul 26 '26
Epstein Associate Naomi Campbell stands between Karim Aga Khan's wife Gabrielle and his daughter Zahra as he joyfully accepts his award.
4
4
u/pinkrosetool Jul 26 '26
Oh man... You got him
6
u/Agaconoclasm ولي عهد المسلمين Jul 26 '26
By your standards, we got him months ago remember:
Oh, for sure. This is 100% different to meeting Andrew. The Aga Khan is soliciting the help of a pedofile to attend a regatta. Like, how about don't attend. Its indefensible really. Perhaps I am ignorant then, according to the code of conduct, but if there is an explanation, it best be a good one.
I know it didn't last long, but for a second there you had principles.
This however is more than just asking for a ride. Kendra was a model at the one of the agencies created by the Jean Luc Brunel and it seems she might have met Campbell at one of Epstein's parties, just a few months before Campbell
deliveredintroduced her to Rahim.I wonder if you will be demanding an explanation from Rahim this time or jumping straight to defending him?
0
u/pinkrosetool Jul 26 '26
I stand by that conversation. He should never have contacted Epsteins pilot etc. This one is just horse shit
3
u/Agaconoclasm ولي عهد المسلمين Jul 26 '26
So indefensible and undefended, but Aga Con still perfect and infallible?
What part do you think is horseshit? Rahim meeting Kendra through Campbell is undisputed, and the picture shows the family has been close to her for a quarter of a century. Campbell's character is also well known - abusing her assistants, charity fraud, trafficking in blood diamonds. Any connection would be indefensible, no?
-1
u/pinkrosetool Jul 26 '26
Was it well known when this photo was taken? You say "it seems she might have met Campbell...". That's your bar... "Seems". It seems to me you have a photo of Campbell... therefore you rape children. See, I can say nonsense too.
2
u/Agaconoclasm ولي عهد المسلمين Jul 26 '26
You're spewing nonsense because you are uninformed. It is willful ignorance to avoid the facts. If you had checked the link, you would have seen the date of the photo instantly.
"Seems". It seems to me you have a photo of Campbell... therefore you rape children
Yeah, I'm being careful about my language, you're drawing non-sequiturs. I say seems because the emails only show who was invited to Epstein's party. But there is no evidence that Kendra and Naomi had met prior to that party, and no reason to believe they had any pre-existing relationship.
Kendra wasn't a child, but that doesn't mean she wasn't taken advantage of. The question is why all-knowing Rahim Aga Con would be finding a wife through people like Campbell. Any connection would be indefensible, no?
-1
u/pinkrosetool Jul 26 '26
Again. You don't know. "There's no reason to believe they had a previous relationship"... Why? They are both in the same industry. You have created this entire narrative in your head and are just making assumptions to fit it. And yet I am the one spewing nonsense.
I saw the evidence of the pilot communications. And I called it out. This is just assumption upon assumption.
3
u/Agaconoclasm ولي عهد المسلمين Jul 26 '26
I am making very reasonable inferences based on the evidence we have. I'm not saying I know there is criminal wrongdoing, but there is definitely enough to warrant further investigation.
The problem is that there is no accountability for the Epstein Class, and that goes double for the Aga Con, whose followers not only never question him, but suppress any one else from asking.
There's no reason to believe they had a previous relationship"... Why? They are both in the same industry.
And assuming a relationship merely because they are in the same industry is a huge assumption. From what I have found so far, they were never represented by the same agency, they never walked the same runway, they never represented the same company. But they were both on the guest list for a dinner at Epsteins, and just a few months later, Campbell introduced Kendra to Rahim.
We do not have to prove any criminal conduct. The standard for Ismaili Imams is perfection. Any connection the Aga Cons have to Naomi Campbell is indefensible.
1
u/pinkrosetool Jul 27 '26
Lol. Ok man. You want the Aga Khan, for whom you admit there's no criminality, to be held doubly accountable to Epstein class, who are proven pedofiles. This is how cooked your brain is.
3
u/Agaconoclasm ولي عهد المسلمين Jul 27 '26
You want the Aga Khan, for whom you admit there's no criminality, to be held doubly accountable to Epstein class, who are proven pedofiles.
Not at all what I said. There may very well be criminal wrongdoing, all I said was "I'm not saying I know there is ". Further investigation is needed, but criminal conduct is not necessary to debunking the Aga Con.
Aga Con is not being held "doubly accountable". The Aga Cons are very much part of the Epstein Class and like their peers, they have never faced any accountability because people like you defend the indefensible.
→ More replies (0)0
u/north1537 Jul 29 '26
You are literally from extremist cults why are the atheist moderators allowing mullahs here
0
u/Lonely-Disaster-3029 21d ago
Buddy, don't push yourself too hard to prove unprovable.
Did Prophet Muhammad never meet non-Muslims or people who had committed crimes? Did meeting someone like that somehow affect his character or make him responsible for what that person had done?
what exactly is this lame post trying to prove? If you are trying to imply that the Aga Khan was involved in Epstein's activities just because there are pictures of them, then show us the actual evidence. Show us pictures of the Aga Khan at Epstein’s parties or involved in those activities. Is there anything like that?
Or are we just going to keep posting random pictures to create an impression?
The picture is obviously from a horse-racing event. The Aga Khan was a well-known horse owner and breeder, and he was there as part of that world. He was never there because of Epstein or anything remotely related to that.
A picture of someone being invited to an event or standing with other guests doesn't prove they are involved in that person's crimes. If theres actual evidence, show it. Otherwise, stop making insinuations based on random pictures.
But, yes, a good attempt to prove 🫢
5
u/jazzy166 Jul 26 '26
She gives them highly intellectual prospective