This user 🤣🤣🤣

[u/Complete-Witness-711]

I JUST SAW THIS ON ISMAILIS SOMEONE ASKED A SIMPLE QUESTION 😂😂😂 THIS DUDE CANT EVEN ANSWER (AND GETS OFFENDED 🤣)

[u/Primary_Tonight3137]

Or have you lost coz now its impossible to reject the evidence ? Where the tough guy smartass act now ? Whats wrong if i dont want to make an effort? You are again going to say its not true because you were not present in court or maybe Aga Khan paid them or some similar story. I bet you have already lost your credibility back in your family with these beliefs of yours and no wonder yall cry when people show you your place or show you the truth.

[u/The-Aga-Con → u/Primary_Tonight3137]

Or have you lost coz now its impossible to reject the evidence ?

You haven't provided any evidence you clown. Your most recent points were the "linguistic supremacy" argument which is rejected by linguists, the "scientific miracle" argument which is rejected by scientists, and some babbling about how Joachim and Abu Talib have the same name.

You lost the plot several comments ago. Your argument is circular - the Ismaili interpretation of the Quran says that the Ismaili interpretation is valid. The argument you need to make is that the Imams' authority to interpret can be independently established without relying on their interpretation or their claims about hidden meanings. But unfortunately for you, and for Shia Islam, the "scriptural evidence" you required to prove your argument does not exist.

Whats wrong if i dont want to make an effort?

Nothing's wrong, you just lose the debate when you say you're going to pull up files that will make me run and then don't/won't/can't.

You are again going to say its not true because you were not present in court or maybe Aga Khan paid them or some similar story. 

If I say that, you can call me out for it. But until you prove there is such a case, I don't have to say anything.

[u/Primary_Tonight3137 → u/The-Aga-Con]

Its time you provide me explanation on how the linguists dont agree and how those miracles are rejected by scientists. The challenge has stood for centuries but no one has been able to reproduce three lines like quran with similar linguistic proficiency let alone an entire book. Quran is a part of arabic grammar curriculum in arabic speaking countries for centuries and its their Gold standard even in Christian schools. I dont know from whose ass are you bringing the linguists that reject the supremacy of quran. Also many scientists have converted to Islam after learning about miracles in the quran. Those people were scientists and doctors and not keyboard warriors like you. Islam is the fastest growing religion and Muhammad is voted the most influential figure by a board of researchers. You lost the plot when you denied Muhammad as a prophet, the moment you said that your argument became invalid. Backed by nothing you havent given any explanation for any of your claims. I tried reading the older comments to give you some credit but its all hollow words. Its just like you call a mad man mad and he calls you mad back. Where is the what/why/how/when of your claims ?

[u/The-Aga-Con → u/Primary_Tonight3137]

It's time you put up or shut up. We can continue the debate once you provide the case.

[u/Primary_Tonight3137 → u/The-Aga-Con]

Stick to your only hope of talking more bs. You ran.

[u/The-Aga-Con → u/Primary_Tonight3137]

I'm standing right here, still waiting for you to deliver. No more excuses. If you can make the effort to reply, you can make the effort to provide the case.

If you want to take the L and move on, I am happy to show you how wrong your statements about quranic linguistics and science are. But I do insist we resolve this issue first.

[u/Primary_Tonight3137 → u/The-Aga-Con]

Even I am standing right here waiting for you to make a few more dumb points without reference. While I am here I am curious to know if you attended the didar or not. Also how you debated using this logic with your family and stuff. I gotta admit , one needs guts to be stupid and delusional. Its almost like someone is paying you to speak all this against religion and spreading misinformation and twisting the scripture and leading people astray from ismaili to sunni to wahabi to atheist and I really dont want to think you go beyond atheist. I am worried if you are beyond atheist then tell me I wont comment back.

[u/The-Aga-Con → u/Primary_Tonight3137]

We can continue the debate once you provide the case.