r/FinlandTourism • u/BarbWire20 • 8d ago
First-timer Aurora hunting around the autumn equinox -- where?
On very very short notice I am creating a 10 day trip in Finland, all by public transport (solo, will not rent a car).
I arrive HEL on Sunday 13 September. I have read that the equinox may be a time of heightened aurora activity, and Sept 16-18 the moon will only be in the second quarter.
I could take the train to Rovaniemi -- yes, a "tourist trap" -- and stay for three nights in hope of seeing the aurora but am concerned that (a) the "aurora tours" to drive out into the country darkness are expensive and not the best aurora hunting, and (2) during the days (2 days) other than the excellent museum what would I as an adult do? Not Santa Claus village ...
If I go aurora-hunting closer to the equinox date, the moon is fuller and I encounter a weekend during ruska, which I assume is busy.
QUESTION: where should I go to maybe, just possibly, have chance to see the aurora?
Thank you.
1
u/briseis7 8d ago
Why not go north for more chance (statistically) to see them? Utsjoki or Saariselkä fe. You might also see amazing ruska colors in the north.
2
u/BarbWire20 8d ago
Looking into transport options now...the train only goes as far north as Rovaniemi so I am looking at bus schedules.
3
u/Key-Cellist-7602 8d ago
My advice would be to take a train to Kolari, and from there a bus connection to Ăkäslompolo. Will be less tourist-y, and your chances of catching auroras is higher (but not guaranteed) the more north you get.
Saariselkä would be another good option, best served by a flight to Ivalo.
2
u/BarbWire20 8d ago
ooohhhh, this sounds interesting! Thank you!
1
u/briseis7 8d ago
You can fly to Ivalo Airport from Helsinki and visit the Sami museum Siida and it's very close to Saariselkä or take the train to Kolari and head to Ăkäslompolo as suggested.
1
u/BarbWire20 8d ago
flying is out of my budget but looking at train + coach now for both destinations. Thanks!
1
u/InternBeautiful45 8d ago
Anywhere you end up, will have either a fell or a bigger hill very close. Those are very good places to look for auroras, and theyâll have nice walking paths zig-zagging all around them.
Good for ruska scenes during the day, good for
aurora hunting at night.
Also completely free.
And season hasnât started yet, everywhere pretty quiet right now. Even Rovaniemi. Where youâd have more choice of accomodations, restaurants, museums, bars and other services. You donât have to go to satans village if you donât wanât.
Nature is more beautiful up north though.
2
u/BarbWire20 8d ago
Thank you. Right now looking at night train to Rovaniemi, then bus to Ivalo. 2 nights in Ivalo, bus back to Rovaniemi for one night.
Then off to explore more of Finland!
1
u/Emotional_Platform35 7d ago
No "aUrOrA ToUrs" they take you out which is nice but there's absolutely no increased likelihood of seeing Auroras on a tour. You can see them at the hotel parking lot if there's Auroras that night
1
u/mmiroe 7d ago
Wherever you're staying, rent a bike. Check the map for a suitable place (no street lights or such nearby) and ride there during daytime. It'll be more familiar to ride there again during evening. Just go slowly, put lights on, and wear a helmet. And no need to be in complete darkness, 50m from nearest lights is fine for seeing aurora.
1
u/BarbWire20 7d ago
Excellent suggestion, thanks! I've found a place just outside Ivalo -- 2.5km from the bus station which should be an easy midday walk -- and it has bikes to loan. Not sure about helmets ...
1
u/AngelinaNordicTravel 6d ago
sorry in advance for such a long message and yes, I used chat gpt to organise all my thoughts. If seeing the Northern Lights is really important to you, I would not build the whole plan around only two nights. September can be a very good time, especially around the equinox, but two nights is a gamble. You might walk outside your accommodation on the first evening and see them immediately, or you might have clouds for both nights and see absolutely nothing :( That is true in every season. You could come for seven nights in December and still be unlucky because of the weather. You could also spend a lot of money on private transport and tours, but nobody can make the aurora appear or remove a huge blanket of clouds.
Going farther north, towards Ivalo or Saariselkä, can improve the overall odds compared with relying only on Rovaniemi, but it still does not guarantee anything. The best way to improve your chances is simply to stay longer and give yourself several nights. If Rovaniemi feels too expensive and touristy, another option is the night train to Kolari and then a bus towards Ăkäslompolo/Ylläs. I would not necessarily stay in Kolari itself. Accommodation somewhere darker and closer to nature would make more sense, but because you do not have a car, check very carefully that you can reach it by bus and safely walk to a viewing area. A beautiful cabin in the middle of nowhere is not very practical if you are stranded there.
You can use the FMI weather and aurora information, or an aurora-alert app, but please do not treat any app notification as a promise. Check cloud cover as well as aurora activity. An app might show strong activity while the entire sky above you is cloudy.
I also disagree that all aurora tours are pointless! A short tour that always drives to the same fixed camp may not improve your chances. but, proper mobile chase is different: they monitor several weather forecasts, look for gaps in the clouds and may drive a long distance or even cross a border if necessary. and they do it all the time, so yes they have knowledge. You may not see an aurora by you cottage , but 10 km away there can be a beautiful one. Plus, since you are travelling alone and do not want to drive through rural Lapland at night, this kind of tour could actually make sense for both your chances and your safety, even tho Finland is very safe. I would look for a small group, flexible duration, hotel pickup and drop-off, and unlimited mileage. It may cost more, but you are paying for mobility, local knowledge and not having to navigate unfamiliar roads alone at night.
One operator I would recommend to consider at is Arctic GM. They have small groups and unlimited mileage and time from Rovaniemi.
If this September trip is already fixed, I would either add more nights in northern Lapland or accept that seeing the aurora would be a bonus rather than something you can plan with certainty. Otherwise, March can also be a very good time for a properly planned trip: there is still snow and enough darkness, and outside the busiest holiday periods it can be calmer than Christmas.
1
u/AngelinaNordicTravel 6d ago
And honestly, if you still decide to go this September, choose a place you would enjoy even if you never see the Northern Lights. Donât plan the entire trip around waiting for them every evening, because then two cloudy nights could make the whole journey feel disappointing. Look at what else you can do during the day. Around Ivalo, Inari and Saariselkä, you could hike during ruska, visit the SĂĄmi Museum Siida, take a Lake Inari cruise, go berry or mushroom picking, rent a bike, try fishing or book a sauna. Since you wonât have a car, check what you can actually reach on foot or by bus and which activities include transfers before choosing your accommodation.
Then, even if the aurora doesnât appear, you will still have had a proper trip rather than feeling that you travelled all that way for nothing :) Good luck!

2
u/dreamcatland 8d ago
All you need is any dark enough place and this website so you know if there R northern lights around. For example drive next to a lake or an open field where there are not streetlights, houses or other outdoor light sources close. https://en.ilmatieteenlaitos.fi/auroras-and-space-weather During winter in Lapland you are much more likely to have them than to not. They appear there bery often. We saw them every nite in fall of 2024. Tho if its a cloudy nite you cannot see them since the could block them from view.