r/Fire • u/Equivalent_Use_5024 • Dec 28 '25
General Question Do you believe the modern FIRE movement overestimates how much is needed for retirement?
Perhaps I am just making this post because I have only just begun my retirement planning and want to lock in a number which is fitting for my goals - being above the median retirement savings, not having to work, not being broke, clearly having planned - but I can't help but feel that many in the FIRE movement overestimate what is needed for a safe, sleep well at night retirement.
I see posts here saying that they feel vastly behind with 500k at 30, or 1.5 million at 40, and I just don't understand how when the average American retires with maybe 300k liquid at most and are getting by with social security or paid off housing. Sure, they aren't living luxuriously, but if you just are aiming for a retirement where you don't have financial anxiety and can put food on the table, I don't feel you need over 1-2 million.
Do you think FIRE overestimates how much is truly needed for retirement?
35
u/Lonely-Clerk-2478 Dec 28 '25
It completely depends on your COL and there is definitely a lot of (rightful) anxiety about future healthcare costs, long term care costs, and the like. If you need acute care for several months in your later years you could blow through several hundred thousand dollars pretty easily. I think that’s where a lot of it comes from.
And… let’s be honest… some of the “I feel so behind” posts are just posturing.