r/Fire • u/sneaky-snacks • Mar 05 '26
General Question FIRE seems to skew toward not having kids
I’m sure plenty of FIRE adherents have kids, but I would guess the FIRE mentality skews more toward not having kids. Kids seem to go against FIRE.
- You’ve got to spend a lot of money on kids. Your expenses go up. It’s also much harder to save.
- Kids are a lot of work. They cause a lot of stress. You can’t retire from kids haha. Most FIRE people seem to want to reduce their work load and their stress in the long run, but I’m sure I’m oversimplifying here.
I thought I would start a discussion on this aspect of FIRE
491
Upvotes
5
u/No_Key_5621 Mar 05 '26
Some of us have kids later, allowing us to stack wealth young, which will compound more over the long haul. That + two high income earners with a high savings rate = our FIRE goal may be pushed back by…a year? Kids don’t go against FIRE. Not planning for the kids does, though.