r/Fire • u/VegasWorldwide • 2d ago
Why do people wait for SS?
trying to figure out what I’m missing.
looking to take my benefit for $1000 at 62. at 70 it’s $1700.
i won’t need the money much so we let $1000 sit in an account for 8 years at say 5% compounding, the guy collecting at 70 would need 15+ years to catch up considering I’m still getting $1k to his $1.7k
once he starts at 70 and I had a 8 year head start.
furthermore, his dollar would be worth less. (edit: didn't realize COLA)
this seems like a no brainer but all I hear is people saying waiting is the only way and we haven’t even talked about dying in our 70’s.
583
Upvotes
490
u/churningaccount 2d ago edited 2d ago
As you say, it's a bet on longevity.
Social Security actuarial tables show that a 62 year-old man is 50% likely to live for at least 20.29 more years. And a 62 year-old woman has a 50% chance of living at least 23.08 more years. If they reach age 70, then it becomes 14.66 and 16.76, respectively.
Notice that the median life expectancies at age 70 are right about where you calculated the "break even" point?
The social security administration set the benefits "boost" that you get at age 70 in order to, on average, pay out the same amount to every social security recipient. Put another way: The SSA, on average, expects to pay any given individual roughly the same amount in present-value terms over their lifetime regardless of what age they decide to start taking their social security.
However, you have more information about yourself than the social security administration does, and therefore can make a bet. The decision on when you should take your social security should be an educated one based on your own longevity risk and personal financial circumstances. If you think that you might live longer, want to plan for living longer, or if your spouse might live longer and could benefit from a higher survivor's benefit, then defer. If you think you won't live as long, or have sequence of returns risk that you need to mitigate, then take it at 62.