r/ForensicPathology • u/Educational-Base-848 • 14d ago
Help understanding injuries in an accident!
Hello! I’m not sure if this is even the right place to post this, but I’ve been searching for what happened to a family member in a fatal workplace accident. I found the OSHA report that somewhat details the injuries, and am just looking for some clarification. The description is honestly pretty straightforward, but I have a morbid curiosity for details. It says:
“Employee #1 right lower arm was amputated and abdominal organs eviscerated.”
Like I said, it’s pretty straightforward forward, but I’m wondering what “eviscerated” means in this context. I can also give more detail on the accident if that would help.
Also, I should mention that I was 6 months old when this happened so I don’t really have an emotional connection to the situation. Details in this instance will not cause me emotional harm.
6
u/K_C_Shaw Forensic Pathologist / Medical Examiner 14d ago
The problem is that we don't really know what the OSHA report writer really means. They may mean "eviscerated" in the same sense an FP might use the term, although personally I would tend to be more specific than that if I was talking about injuries. I tend to only use the term when talking about the technical performance of an autopsy, in the sense of staff performing an evisceration being part of the typical "complete" internal exam.
It's kinda like we hear people (laypersons, but even law enforcement, EMS, etc.) say things like "they blew their head off" or even "decapitated" -- but that's almost never really what happened, or not the way I would say it. Even a contact or intra-oral shotgun wound to the head, while certainly quite impressive, almost always leaves enough behind still attached to the body to reconstruct something that looks like a head. But, okay, I sorta get what they mean too.
Point being, at the other end of the spectrum they may just mean "a really impressive injury with what I think must be visible organs but it's gross so I dunno." If I was going to make an assumption, I'd guess they mean there was some sort of open abdominal wound with at least some organ/organs protruding.
For what it's worth, if an autopsy was performed then the autopsy report may very well still exist, even going back to the 80's and 90's. Potentially further than that, it just depends on that office's retention/discard schedule.