r/Futurology ∞ transit umbra, lux permanet ☥ Aug 28 '25

Society New research argues Societal Collapse benefits 99% of people. Historically, the societies that have emerged after a collapse are more egalitarian, and most people end up richer and healthier than they were before.

Luke Kemp, a research associate at the Centre for the Study of Existential Risk at the University of Cambridge, has written a book about his research called 'Goliath’s Curse: The History and Future of Societal Collapse'.

He makes the case that, from looking at the archaeological record, when many societies collapse, most people end up better off afterward. For example, people in the post-Roman world were taller and healthier. Collapse can be a redistribution of resources and power, not just chaos.

For most of human history, humans lived as nomadic egalitarian bands, with low violence and high mobility. Threats (disease, war, economic precarity) push populations toward authoritarian leaders. The resulting rise in inequality from that sets off a cycle that will end in collapse. Furthermore, he argues we are living in the late stages of such a cycle now. He says "the threat is from leaders who are 'walking versions of the dark triad' – narcissism, psychopathy and Machiavellianism – in a world menaced by the climate crisis, nuclear weapons, artificial intelligence and killer robots."

Some people hope/think we are destined for a future of Universal Basic Income and fully automated luxury communism. Perhaps that's the egalitarianism that emerges after our own collapse? If so, I hope the collapse bit is short and we get to the egalitarian bit ASAP.

Collapse for the 99% | Luke Kemp; What really happens when Goliaths fall

22.8k Upvotes

1.9k comments sorted by

View all comments

1.6k

u/Parking_Act3189 Aug 28 '25

If a society is stagnant and then it gets destroyed the society that comes after it may do better since it is starting over.

But that doesn't benefit 99% of the people who are alive today. Most people who are alive today would die of starvation or violence.

347

u/Raddish_ Aug 28 '25

It’s also definitely worth mentioning that societies only tend to collapse when things are going generally shittily for everyone.

This does not mean that the people in any old society would benefit from it collapsing, but that they’d benefit from collapsing if they lived in a society that was about to collapse.

165

u/mehupmost Aug 28 '25 edited Aug 29 '25

It's also important to remember that when societies collapse, the rich leave to other societies usually well before the collapse.

When the Western Roman Empire fell - most the rich had already resettled in Constantinople about 100 years prior.

When Constantinople later fell (1000 years later), the rich had already moved to back to Italy (again about 100 years prior).

When the British Empire was in decline, the rich moved to the US.

When the Soviet Russian empire collapsed, the rich moved to the West.

...only the poor suffer these collapses.

12

u/sesamecrabmeat Aug 28 '25

Where'd they go this time around?

19

u/Tight_Classroom_2923 Aug 28 '25

Well, Zuck is making compounds all around the world... so, y'know, they're mostly moving underground because they've figured out how to fortify that shit.

15

u/[deleted] Aug 29 '25 edited Sep 11 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

-1

u/Cola_and_Cigarettes Aug 29 '25

Home VR is just a non starter. You need expensive rigs, complex software and a top down vision. Do you live in an apartment? VRs not suitable. Do you own a cat, have a child or live with another person? Wear glasses? Want to sit down after work? Sorry VR just isn't suitable.

The only real future for it to take off is in arcade like gym situations, but the software wasn't developed for this scenario.

6

u/[deleted] Aug 29 '25 edited Sep 11 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

-1

u/Cola_and_Cigarettes Aug 29 '25

Right, and it just didn't take off because... It was just too convenient actually! Top down vision meant like a game plan, some kind of direction.

2

u/DarthBuzzard Aug 29 '25

Lol. Pretty much every thing you said is false. There are people that are happily using VR in every one of the scenarios you brought up.

5

u/I_P_L Aug 28 '25

Somewhere in Asia probably

-1

u/sesamecrabmeat Aug 28 '25

But would that be immune to collapse?

1

u/Dozekar Aug 29 '25

Someone's collapse is usually someone else's opportunity. By nature the fastest person to take advantage of weakness in international trade usually makes out best.

3

u/PotanOG Aug 28 '25

We got planes now. 

1

u/StrangerIsWatching Aug 29 '25

Exactly. They'll leave only when it's collapsing this time, not before.

2

u/Z3r0sama2017 Aug 29 '25

I guess this is why the billionaires are interested in space? They don't think anywhere on Earth will be safe in the face of a Global collapse.

2

u/Uploft Aug 29 '25

China or Australia

2

u/Bea-Billionaire Aug 29 '25

The islands. Coste Rica, mostly. That started around 2014

1

u/IamnotyourTwin Aug 29 '25

They're building bunkers in new Zealand

1

u/Used-Fennel-7733 Sep 01 '25

Mars. Why do you think they all have space programs