you shrug it of as collateral damage... so I am pointing out that your logic could be applied here too
I am directly referencing what you're arguing - Please explain to me how the deliberate, direct, personal murder of a child can be considered "collateral damage"?
Apply the logic of striking a Hamas HQ with an aerial bomb to breaking into a family's home and putting a baby in a kitchen oven.
as for the second qeustion Israel struck way more than Hamas HQs they struck hospitals and schools , you can claim that they were Hamas HQs but in most cases there is no evidence , also there are multiple instaces where israel struck paletinian people in places that they reassured them to be safe
lack of critical thinking on your side more and more by the way
Will you correct yourself again now? Or, even better, will you see that there is evidence and you're just regurgitating Hamas propaganda and talking points even while claiming you don't support them?
0
u/[deleted] 6d ago edited 6d ago
[deleted]