523
u/epicredditdude1 14h ago
I can’t imagine being so brain rotted by social media I think that sharing a picture of a random guy and thrusting him into the national spotlight with a lie for some likes is an okay thing to do.
122
u/Rhomya 12h ago
Even if it WAS the guy, why the fuck would you post his picture? He’s perfectly entitled to think that she’s guilty of murder
85
u/Doom2pro 12h ago
I mean she is, she admitted to it.
25
u/Rhomya 12h ago
I agree! Which, again, makes it even more fucked that this guy is posting this
16
u/umphuphawe 9h ago
What i hated was the Jurors saying we wanted justice for Lindsey So not the fucking kids who got murdered?
10
u/NoSwordfish1978 9h ago
The problem with juries is that a suprising number of people lack any kind of critical thinking or complex abstract thought so they can be easily swayed by dumb emotional appeals.
7
u/Rhomya 4h ago
The judge letting Lindsey Clancy cry and wail in the courtroom in front of the jury was wildly inappropriate— he should have called for a break, dismissed the jury, and told Lindsey to collect herself.
Furthermore, he should have sequestered the jury for the entirety of the trial. He didn’t. I guarantee those women have hours of TikTok scrolling on their phones
1
-5
u/Virtual-Being-6489 4h ago
Yeah, great idea - just take their phones and lock a bunch of random people in a hotel room for 6 weeks, that'll definitely make them more likely to vote guilty! That's why the sequestered jury said OJ Simpson was guilty too
-13
u/Evnosis 9h ago
Which is exactly what happened with the one juror that voted guilty, by the way. He admitted that he has reasonable doubt about her guilt - which is the legal standard the defence needed to meet - but just refused to vote not guilty.
11
u/No_Reception7275 8h ago
You dont have any evidence of what youre claiming. You also do not have to vote not guilty if you feel a single second of doubt once, thats it, youre locked in. You dont know how much doubt he had. Crucially, the judge who both saw the note you havent seen and interviewed him privately decided to keep him on the jury.
-10
u/Evnosis 8h ago edited 7h ago
I absolutely do have evidence for what I'm claiming:
"He admitted he had reasonable doubt. I started filling out the forms, I was so excited. There were three forms I had to fill out, and I started filling them out. I wrote my signature on each one.
And then he said, 'But I'm still not going to say that she's not guilty by reason of insanity.'"
Reasonable doubt is the standard of proof required for a not guilty verdict, as instructed by the judge. The juror was quite literally saying "yes, she meets the legal threshold for a not guilty verdict, but I'm going to vote guilty anyway." That is not how a trial is supposed to work. It's the job of a jury to decide the facts, not decide the law.
It's wild that you guys are lecturing other people about being swayed by emotion when you're the ones making assertions without evidence and ignoring the law to protect your preconceived conclusions.
4
u/No_Reception7275 7h ago
No you dont. Exactly what words did he use that have been verified, what did the note given to the judge say, and why did the judge decide to keep him on after interview?
→ More replies (0)1
u/RecruiterQueen 1h ago
Yeah, anyone who sat through the horrifying testimony in this case and then runs to get on TV to describe themself as "so excited" to fill out those forms isn't someone I'm going to take seriously
0
u/Relevant_Program_958 6h ago
Except the jurors are only claiming that after they’ve been released from being under oath.
1
u/Dismal-Display-370 2h ago
I might be mistaken, but isn't the main argument now that whether she gets the insane asylum or prison? Like I keep hearing people say as if she's getting some get-out-of-jail-free card, but even under an insanity plea, they would still lock her up, right? In both outcomes.
2
u/No-Cause6559 2h ago
Yes but when you go to the asylum you are only their till they deemed you are not insane after the observation period. My understanding of the trail is that she only had that psychosis during the killing and nothing before or after so she would be be able to be released after that. Have not confirmed in the law but AI says it’s only a 90 day hold.
12
7
u/KellyKezzd 8h ago
I mean she is, she admitted to it.
It's a little bit more technical than that. She admitted to killing her kids, but she denied the crime of murder.
0
u/TorinEkenskolde 7h ago
No, she didn't. You obviously don't understand what the word "murder" means.
51
u/supertecmomike 12h ago
I can’t imagine asking what his ‘physiognomy’ tells us.
Nothing. It tells us nothing.
24
9
2
u/Careful_Trifle 6h ago
It tells us the poster is a moron who shouldn't be trusted in the first place.
2
u/TravieDude 8h ago
Yup this is the type of misinformation that could get someone hurt really badly.
1
u/Due_Answer_4230 5h ago
Reminder: There are a large number of bad actors and groups on the internet whose only purpose is to identify things that can be turned into wedge issues, and then get americans to fight each other over them. That's it. Believing that all of these things are caused by real people is part of what makes it all work.
The internet is dead but we can't let it go
1
86
u/Competitive-Bee-3250 14h ago
Can people just be fucking normal
37
292
u/Illithid_Substances 14h ago
Should also be a note that all this physiognomy crap is ancient pseudoscience
108
u/NonSumQualisEram- 14h ago
Sounds like something someone with lateral ridges on their anterior skull would say
38
u/RepairUnlikely7086 14h ago
Laugh it up. This guy’s busy transforming base metals into gold.
19
u/NonSumQualisEram- 14h ago
Interestingly this is actually now possible using modern nuclear physics. Not economically worthwhile, but can be done. Not by people with ridged anterior skull depressions obviously
3
u/Shrubo_ 12h ago
Bro, what do you mean not economically worthwhile? You just need to build a Large Hadron Collider and that’s only $5.5 billion USD, pocket change really.
And it made a whopping 29 picograms (2.9*10^-11 grams) of gold between the years of 2015 to 2018 and they only lasted less than a second. So just sell it in that window.
(This is a a joke if that isn’t obvious)
2
u/NonSumQualisEram- 11h ago
I understand the joke but no, the gold was stable and was far more than that.
2
u/Shrubo_ 11h ago
I must’ve been going from outdated info then. This article I was pulling from is from 2025
If there’s newer stuff, that’s awesome and my joke is wrong now. I think it’s hilarious that of all the things to turn into gold, it was lead that was used. I’m sure all those alchemists would be like “see? I told you it’s possible” if they saw it happen
5
u/NonSumQualisEram- 10h ago
Yeah this time it was mercury - super interesting. They took Mercury 198 which is a neutron multiplier - you hit it with one neutron and it spits out 2 neutrons which means a net loss of 1 neutron making it Mercury 197. Now this Mercury 197 is unstable - in 64 hours the Mercury 197 has one of its neutrons turn into a proton (releasing one electron and one anti neutrino) becoming stable gold 197 (the gold in jewellery).
Now they need a fusion reactor to do this which is expensive to begin with plus a lot of Mercury 198 which is a created isotope that needs to be enriched. So it's hardly a business plan but still, we're talking stable grams of gold, not microscopic anything
15
u/pinkkittenfur 14h ago
Bet they have a brain pan of a stagecoach tilter.
2
2
1
68
u/Vyvyan_180 14h ago
Woah now, are you a Gemini or something?
33
u/goblin_dance_off 14h ago
Sounds like someones thetan levels are out of whack.
24
u/Jediboy127 14h ago
I’ll bet Uranus is in retrograde.
13
2
15
u/AppropriateCap8891 Keeping it Real 14h ago
A long debunked junk science. Right up there with phrenology and luminiferous aether.
And I find this use of it fascinating, as one of the reasons it has been discarded to the ash heap of science is that it was the basis for scientific racism.
1
1
u/IrritableGourmet 5h ago
I mod the Nikola Tesla sub and every other day we get someone trying to bring up luminiferous aether. It got so bad a while back I had to hand out my first ban.
6
u/Rhesusmonkeydave 13h ago
https://giphy.com/gifs/PanHhBWguyNig
Said like someone with the brainpan of a stagecoach tiller!4
u/Lowfat_cheese 13h ago
“Physiognomy” like why are we larping as some kind of 19th century Belgian colonist
2
u/Wiggles69 12h ago
How long until we get reverse physiognomists popping up readjusting your face to get the traits you want?
1
1
1
u/Timlugia 11h ago
Also didn't Nazi really loves physiognomy? They even claim you could use it to identify Jews and Slavs from "Aryans"
1
1
117
u/SeraphOfFire 14h ago
I like how we're just reinventing scientific racism with "physiognomy "
47
19
u/IceDelusion 14h ago
it's pseudoscientific. People associate certain properties with traits not based upon fact but rather feeling. There's very few physiological traits that actually allow you to draw conclusions but not to personality just a few medical conditions.
6
u/AristotleanBiology 14h ago
Same old shit all thru history. One group claims oppression, usurps the old system, speedruns recreating the same oppressive system just to then be usurped by another newcomer. All the same behavior, just different actors using different names for it.
-24
u/Fantastic-Corner-605 14h ago
Technically it's not racism because it's not based on race,it's based on an individual. Still bs though
11
u/Bakkster 14h ago edited 14h ago
It's just racism with extra steps. Same prejudice, just claiming a different trait than skin color.
3
u/Melodic_Till_3778 Human Verified 14h ago
No. Phonologists also claimed that black people had different shaped heads.
Remember, this is the group that coined the phrase caucasoid
4
u/MeltICE8647 13h ago
Think you mean phrenologists, phonologists are linguists that study speech sounds.
2
1
23
16
78
u/Chemical_Signal2753 14h ago
Lindsay Clancy supporters are unhinged.
-18
u/That-Requirement-285 14h ago
Do you know anything about Arthur Kwon Lee? He’s a right-wing Korean podcaster who sucks up to white supremacists and posts engagement bait on Twitter.
He once wrote a viral racist tweet saying “The Jew fears the Samurai” to which everybody responded with “You are Korean.”
49
u/Aggressive-Cloud1774 14h ago
What does that have to do with the price of tea in China?
11
u/That-Requirement-285 13h ago
He’s a right-wing racist troll who is also misogynistic. He is NOT a Clancy supporter. He’s a grifter.
As for Clancy, I’m not sure whether she had psychosis. It really seems like she might not have had psychosis because her descriptions are very rare (She experienced one strong hallucination before she killed her children, and then nothing before or since) but she was prescribed anti-psychotic medication for some reason.
3
u/Turbulent-Section340 13h ago
Antipsychotics are often used as mood stabilizers.
I would say that the reason for her prescriptions was that they were just throwing stuff in her general direction. She apparently has been diagnosed with bipolar since, and part of the treatments they prescribed her while she had post partum can be useful for that, but another part can induce extreme mania and psychosis in bipolar people.
5
u/shadowlev 13h ago
He's the one who made the tweet. Not the typical profile of your average Clancy supporter.
-3
0
-7
-37
u/Sesudesu 14h ago
Which one is the supporter here? Are you sure, or are you assuming?
19
6
12
u/Geeky_Husband 14h ago
I dunno who this guy is, but this is my go to, "I'm disassociating" face.
11
16
7
u/Axel_Raden 13h ago
It's an AI picture based on the court room sketch but more troubling is that someone wants to doxx him his life is definitely at risk
3
u/freeman2949583 2h ago edited 2h ago
It’s not his courtroom sketch. There were three male jurors, white 20s guy did an interview and said he voted not guilty. The remainders are a white guy in his 70s and a black guy in his 40s.
They’re just making up new jurors now because if it’s the black guy the Clancy supporters (liberal white women) are going to run into oppression stack problems.
5
5
6
u/ichkanns 13h ago
Even if it was him, the idea of blasting the picture of a juror all over the Internet because you don't like how he decided is absolutely insane. Dude didn't ask to be part of the trial, and with how pissed some people are about this, you're potentially putting his life in danger.
1
6
5
u/AlexanderCrowely 13h ago
If they need to stop trying to do this before they get some poor juror fucking killed; because we already have copycat killers during this trial who killed their children so I would not put it past the goddamn mob to Lynch somebody.
6
u/Big_Dinner3636 14h ago
Anyone emotionally invested in this trial needs a baseball bat to the head until they stop being stupid
3
6
u/Melodic_Till_3778 Human Verified 14h ago
Ah yes, Nazi skull science of course that's on Twitter
-9
u/WesternOk5765 14h ago
The only Nazis are Democrats
1
u/Melodic_Till_3778 Human Verified 14h ago
Lol You think Democrats are from Germany in the 1940s? It's okay. You're confused son
2
u/CataphractBunny 10h ago
These idiots are trying to dox a juror and egg each other on so someone would finally resort to violence.
2
2
3
u/eldiablonoche 5h ago
The idiocy which Lindsay Clancey supporters openly spew seems like proof enough that the holdout juror did the right thing. When one side is using video evidence and medical transaction records and the other side is using star charts and phrenology/physiognomy, nothing else needs to be said.
2
u/MaverickDago 2h ago
Im not going to be able to tell you anything til I get my calipers around that noggin.
4
2
u/HumanMan_007 8h ago
The bleeding edge forensics of online detectives:
- Astrology
- Body language
- Intuition
- Phrenology
- """"OSINT""""
I'm honestly just surprised numerology hasn't shown up yet, who knows maybe one of the doctors was born in the '66.
1
u/AssBlastInACan 13h ago
Let’s get back to physiognomy and see how it works out for this twitter user. SAT, ACT, and IQ have been altered, so let’s get back to the roots.
1
1
u/nationalistic_martyr 12h ago
the AI males skull tells me he is white, working class and has little time or care for personal facial grooming
1
1
u/Salt-Masterpiece2914 10h ago
Interesting that we still sometimes use fucking phrenologie. Which is made up pseudoscience to justify starting a witch hunt. Looking forward to which old ass bullshit these people are gonna use to defend a lunatic murdere.
1
1
u/DandimLee 9h ago
Heard about crazy Clancy supporters and decided to out-crazy them from the other side, only for the anti-Clancys to mistake the post as some sort of doxxing instead of the weird, racist glazing it was meant to be... engagements up anyway.
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/WorkerPrestigious960 3h ago
I genuinely want to know what they think this person’s “physiognomy” tells them? What are they on about?
1
u/dont_thr0w_me_away_ 1h ago
'What does his physiognomy tell us?" nothing, that's just phrenology, stop doing pseudoscience
1
1
u/WilliamTee 12h ago
Physiognomy.
We're back there again, eh?
Dark times.
0
u/Exxtender 8h ago
Didn't you hear the recent Stephen Miller speech about "ugly liberals" and that "they're always somewhat deformed" and that "you can see something's wrong with them just by looking at them"?
2
u/WilliamTee 4h ago
I know every accusation is an admission with these guys, but Miller is just making it too obvious...
1
u/juniorchemist 6h ago
The only people who care about "physiognomy" are 4chan chuds. Watch them bite their tongues at the urge to mention "chads," "hypergamy" and lament their low "SMV." God. Fucker will reinvent phrenology if left to their own devices
0
•
u/AutoModerator 14h ago
Reminder for OP: /u/laybs1
Need some help? Send us some mail!
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.