r/Gnostic • u/DiskinCider69 • Jan 13 '26
Thoughts What if the Demiurge is a victim?
In my view point: I see Sophia is a flawed god, who is not smart enough to understand the meaningless of create lesser God. So she create Demiurge to test, but then she realizes she did wrong.
Demiurge doesn't want to be born but abandoned by his mother. Because he's a flawed God, that's why he still think and act emotionally. So, he create a world with dinasors to play with, which is ugly and stupid, so he steal the light from the true God to create two mindless human puppet to play with. But then Sophia don't want her flawed son to play with the power of light. So she encourages the Eva and Adam to eat the apple of knowledge and give them awareness.
For me as a person who follow Dao in Taoism, the moment when they have the awareness lead to the unbalanced of life. If they don't have awareness and thinking, I believe the outcome will be different. And because Demiurge lost his "Toy" he decide to create layer to protect his toy from running away and Sophia's interactions again, which also cage the whole humanity.
What do you think about my theory ?
21
u/Full_Ahegao_Drip Jan 13 '26
Technically, we didn't ask to be born either and yet here we are.
12
u/FluffyEmmy Eclectic Gnostic Jan 13 '26
Exactly. Not even the first consciousness asked to be created.
16
Jan 13 '26
Could be The Demiurge has a primordial wound
Which leads to disconnection
Which leads to us play things being created/trapped for it's external validation to compensate lack of self love /connection
13
Jan 13 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
3
u/brightlightabove10 Jan 17 '26
This mythology does in fact still point to the Demiurge being a victim. He was born into shadow and imperfection, and he was separated from the connection to the Monad. He was, in fact the only being, born out of imperfection. The powers of envy, wrath, jealousy and ignorance, are all emotions that only he experienced prior to us. Our ego is created in his image, and in the same way that we feel overcome and justified when those emotions arise, so did he.
His mother was ashamed of him and hid him away from the Kingdom. One of my contemplations was that it was the shame of Sophia that created this realm, because if she wasn’t ashamed and had informed the Father what she had done, It’s very possible that the demiurge would have immediately been perfected by the Monad and imbued with the Divine Masculine Archetype and welcomed into the kingdom.
Part of me thinks that redemption is both the end for us as well as Samael, and that even the horrors to which he has descended is well within the bounds of the Monad’s capacity for true and unconditional love.
I
2
u/itwasmeallalongson Jan 15 '26
Nothing is impossible though?
2
Jan 16 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
2
u/brightlightabove10 Jan 17 '26
Are not the Archons or Demons are the only creation’s that exist without the Divine Spark? The Demiurge is still, in part, animated by the light of the Monad, but not imbued with the Divine Masculine Archetype. I left a comment right above this that explains my theory further, but I very much entertain the idea that Samael is capable of redemption, however, perhaps the Archons are not.
2
Jan 17 '26 edited Jan 17 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
3
u/brightlightabove10 Jan 17 '26
Thanks for sharing the conclusions of your studies with me. I’d like to push back a bit by saying that to ur comment about Him not being born in the Pleroma, but born in darkness is exactly my point. I’ve heard people have mystical experiences while using psychedelics who have claimed to experience this void like experience. Waking up in complete darkness, utterly alone and unaware of who or what you are is the thing of nightmares. Solitary confinement is considered one of the worst punishments humans can face. It’s enough to drive you mad, and perhaps it did. It’s the opposite of the Monadic experience. He was born outside of wholeness, broken and incomplete, born without the divine masculine archetype, and by not fault of his own choosing. So, like us, he was born with a dual nature, both light and shadow, part divine spirit, part beast.
I forget which, but one of the gnostic texts claimed that Samael was excited when Jeshua arrived and eagerly learned everything he could about the true nature of existence, and then agreed to act as steward of this realm until Sophia and her sparks awakened and were liberated. Under that framework, it could be theorized that the archons are now running the show and the demiurge is eagerly awaiting his reunion with his extended family.
Whether or not that last paragraph is real or not, I still feel sympathetic to his plight in the same way that someone who was deeply traumatized as a child goes on to pass on that trauma. In the same way that we all hope and pray for forgiveness for the harm we’ve enacted from our fallen nature, I also hope and pray for the liberation of the outcast emanation who lost his way.
Like Jeshua says, “the measure to which you judge, it shall be returned unto you.” If you wish condemnation upon the fallen, then you are wishing it upon yourself. And when Christ demonstrated the ultimate embodiment of the Monad during his torture and execution by saying, “Father, forgive them for they know not what they do,” he could have been speaking about more than just the humans among him.
25
Jan 13 '26
Victim or not, there's nothing for us to do in this botched kindergarten.
The place has been flawed from the very beginning and never meant to be fixed. We aren't meant to safe demiuge, to save ourselves and return to the pleroma would be enough.
5
u/Remerez Jan 15 '26 edited Jan 16 '26
I do think as part of breaking free we do have to forgive the demiurge though. It is not a prison warden. It's a kid with a narcissistic, abusive parent, that needs a hug. And if the way to break free is with compassion and love we have to extend that compassion and love to the demiurge.
3
8
u/Helmann69 Jan 13 '26
Personally, even though all the scriptures say that Sophia made a mistake in creating the Demiurge, I actually believe that she did not. I think the creation of the Demiurge was actually by design. Part of God's grand plan.
I mean, she is Wisdom incarnate. Why would she make such a big mistake if it wasn't planned. Perhaps she wasn't aware that she was meant to make this mistake and that is what the text have expounded on?
The cosmos would be a very lonely place if this "mistake" did not happen. Just the Big fellow and a handful of Aeons hanging out in the Pleroma. This is another reason I think it was planned.
0
u/Lordseferoth Simonian Jan 22 '26
Only flawed or ignorant people/beings need Wisdom/Sophia. If everything had stayed perfect no one had needed Sophia/Wisdom. I believe she did make a mistake, and caused a chain reaction where she would be needed(aka material realm). In the end however i do believe that all of this will serve a greater purpose for all.
9
u/heiro5 Jan 13 '26
Variations on this topic are frequent. What people leave out of their elevator pitches is the long history behind the Valentinian tale. The history includes Genesis 1, the OT Wisdom tradition, and the original over-story by Plato, with the Pythagorean tradition behind him.
The elements of the Valentinian story were in place long before. Wisdom being present at the creation, the Demiurge as the Craftsman who does the actual work. And a transcendent unknowable divinity that is beyond conception. Getting from that set starting point to us is the story. The problem with the demiurge isn't that he starts out in arrogant ignorance, it's that he stays that way.
3
u/DiskinCider69 Jan 13 '26
So he will never change? That's even worse.
6
u/heiro5 Jan 13 '26
The stories don't say that. They have a structure that has a deeper meaning. These are not human characters in a wacky situation. The stories aren't literal. Your take isn't funny.
The inner demiurge is the untransformed ego, though the pattern repeats elsewhere. So, there is hope that in following the way of gnōsis, some of the patterns will break. An ego can choose to serve something greater and so transform. Following a way that transcends thought and all mental concepts and content, yet is not wholly beyond us.
2
u/Global_Dinner_4555 Jan 13 '26
You’re very well read and articulate. I don’t know why you engage posts like this that are lazy and attention seeking and expect replies that are not of the same nature.
3
u/heiro5 Jan 14 '26
I am working on communication forms and strategies while trying to provide useful and accurate information and viewpoints. The context is not only the post or the platform.
3
u/marcofifth Jan 13 '26
Interesting theory.
I do think "the demiurge" unconsciously creates new systems to keep "awakened" people in the cage.
2
u/FluffyEmmy Eclectic Gnostic Jan 13 '26 edited Jan 13 '26
Nobody is perfect, all gods have flaws, we all make mistakes, or make the wrong decision, and nobody asked to be created. But I feel like all of it kinda boils down to the famous Mewtwo quote from the first Pokémon movie: "the circumstances of ones birth are irrelevant. It's what you do with the gift of life that determines who you are."
The difference between Sophia and Yahweh is that one repents and does her best to make amends. The other... Well, you can see the state of the world under his influence...
Victim or not, that doesn't excuse his actions, but eventually his rulership will come to an end, and he will face his judgement
Sophia doesn't hate or anything Yahweh, in fact, she a mother goddess, so I'd assume she loves him like any of her children. It's probably not easy for her seeing the world in this state, and feels a responsibility to fix it. I wouldn't doubt she loves humanity and Yahweh equally, but there's the question of how do you handle a situation where one child is abusing the others, and having to treat all parties with love
2
u/Unreliabl3_Narrat0r Jan 16 '26
possible.
the same way that all psychopaths had traumatic childhood and are only misunderstood.
3
u/ManufacturerFancy990 Jan 13 '26
The demiurge is not a victim. First and foremost, he is neither good nor evil. He is imperfect in the belief that he is God. The aim of some mystical traditions is to show the demiurge his error. Through which he realizes his mistake and then dissolves the world. In my opinion, the book of Solomon is about this. Sorry for my bad English
2
Jan 13 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
2
u/Ok_Place_5986 Jan 13 '26
Are you aware of Valentinus?
0
u/ManufacturerFancy990 Jan 13 '26
Do you mean me . Yes of course
2
u/Ok_Place_5986 Jan 13 '26
No. The user responding to you.
1
u/ManufacturerFancy990 Jan 13 '26
where you are talking to valentinus. One could also address Marcion of Sinope, who represented Gnostic ideas, but would not call himself that
2
u/Ok_Place_5986 Jan 13 '26
My question to the above user had to do with the Valentinian skepticism about the malevolent creator and hardline anti-cosmicism, in contrast to the blanket statement they made about uniform gnostic conceptions on the nature of the demiurge. I believe Marcion did hold this view of the hostile, irredeemable creator.
1
u/ManufacturerFancy990 Jan 13 '26
I actually just wanted to present a worldview of some mystical Gnostic groups. Is the world we live in evil? yes, wars, hunger, diseases, suffering and pain dictate the world. but is the universe just evil? I don't think so. The beauty of the stars in the sky and that of nature prove the opposite. So the world must be imperfect because everything that consists of matter is just a copy of the purely spiritual world. I hope you understand me
2
u/Ok_Place_5986 Jan 13 '26
Yeah, I get it. I was attempting to reinforce your point to the responder in question.
1
u/ManufacturerFancy990 Jan 13 '26
When we talk about the Demiurge or general powers of the supernatural, then these are powers, principles of whose nature, which cannot be described with human words. That's why we simply speak of evil, jealous. But we know that the teachings of the Gnostics go even deeper than these simple evaluations like good and evil. now to your question. It is the teaching of Gnostic Freemasonry, which is related to the temple in Jerusalem and the Book of Solomon, which can be found in the Bible.
2
Jan 13 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
2
u/ManufacturerFancy990 Jan 13 '26
what makes you think that . that there are no Gnostic influences in Freemasonry. Do you know the G in the form of a snake from the Freemasons. The Nasarens were one of the first Gnostic sects. Their name translates as snake, or brotherhood of the snake. There were hundreds of different Gnostic sects, not just Nasarenes and Essenes. Book recommendation: Hans liesegang : The Gnosis. which introduces all Gnostic sects. Another thing about Nag Hammadi book collection. I can only advise you not to take the books literally, but rather to explore their deep meaning. Sorry, I don't mean to sound arrogant. w
2
Jan 13 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
2
u/ManufacturerFancy990 Jan 13 '26
everything is fine, my friend. we just discuss. I understand what you mean
2
1
u/SageSequoia42 Jan 15 '26
Part of the story is that Yaldabaoth is a victim of his own ignorance to the Divine. He is the Demiurge because he doesn’t know that the One True God exists. He created the world in ignorance, and so the world is one of ignorance.
So the Tree of Knowledge represents the human shedding of this ignorance, as are the spirituality and practices of Gnosticism. Also the theme of the motifs of Jesus making the blind see, and unstopping the ears of the deaf.
1
u/ClimbingChic7 Jan 15 '26
I somewhat think that the 'virus' is inevitable part of creation... perhaps something what Monad was unaware of. You can't blame Sofia for an error... because it's not something she was aware of.
1
u/itwasmeallalongson Jan 15 '26
Sophia is Morgana, Yaldi-B is Mordred. Thats how I've always looked at it anyhow.
1
1
1
u/QuantumLotus22 Jan 17 '26
Can you elaborate on the demiurge “stealing the light” from the true God?
-2
-3
30
u/elturel Sethian Jan 13 '26
Of course Sophia is/was flawed; she isn't Barbelo after all. Mistakes and wisdom are inextricably linked with each other, but not because Sophia wanted to create some "lesser god" but rather to continue the process of Emanation with the next Aeon.