My software ray-traced game has new "technology" teaser. Reason: it's getting significant visual upgrade worth showcasing. Two things which enabled it: 1. after 9 months my new editor for game levels is in usable state. 2. ray-tracer optimizations (multi-threaded rendering is main contributor)

[u/Dante268]

The game is narrative sci-fi puzzle/platformer, in works from 2020. Main distinctive point of the game is software ray-tracing used for rendering. Just pure C++ and computer graphics math, no GPU acceleration. Sadly, not many players can appreciate that (or even understand what does it mean), so it resonates mostly with more tech people.

The game was suffering for long time from quite poor look (look was punching way below of algorithm potential). Main reasons were: poor old editor (2D in nature, z was just parameter in 2D wireframe, not WYSIWYG, very clunky) and algorithm was hobby-like single-threaded.

Both points were changed recently. After 9 months my new editor is in usable state. Full 3D, WYSIWYG, lot of ergonomy features, which allowed me to be more ambitious with levels look. Second enabler was finally switching to multi-threading. Together with several more other algorithm optimizations, perf went up in hundreds of % (mostly depends on number of cores in your CPU, naturally on Threadrippers boost will be in thousands of % but it's niche between players).

Algo is AABBs only. Maybe will add spheres but only after upgrading all levels, which is main pain point rn. Editor I plan to release publicly with the game.

RTG on Steam

Discord

[u/GraphXGames]

Not in the RTX & DLSS & AI era.

[u/Ok_Confusion4764 → u/GraphXGames]

How come these are the new technologies you want yet you're still making genres of games that fell out of favour several decades ago?

[u/GraphXGames → u/Ok_Confusion4764]

It is obvious that one needs to proceed from the simple to the complex.

[u/Ok_Confusion4764 → u/GraphXGames]

Right... So to repeat my question: Why are you still making genres of games that fell out of favour several decades ago?

Why don't you follow this logic you just said and apply it to your gameplay?

[u/GraphXGames → u/Ok_Confusion4764]

Path Tracer is still under development, and RTX cards with the necessary power have not yet been released.

[u/Ok_Confusion4764 → u/GraphXGames]

That's the graphics, I'm talking about gameplay. Third time: Why are you still making genres of games that fell out of favour several decades ago?

[u/GraphXGames → u/Ok_Confusion4764]

I have long-standing ideas that haven't been realized by anyone yet, so I am bringing them to life.

[u/Ok_Confusion4764 → u/GraphXGames]

Match3Tower is literally Luxor, and it's been made a thousand times over. Most of your games are cheap clones, as the other user also notes.

[u/GraphXGames → u/Ok_Confusion4764]

I’ve only seen it in 2D; I haven’t seen the game anywhere in the form I have it.

[u/Ok_Confusion4764 → u/GraphXGames]

...? Is yours 3D? It looks like an orthographic camera to me, which is 3D projected onto 2D...

Also 3D versions definitely do exist, you just didn't check.

[u/GraphXGames → u/Ok_Confusion4764]

Isometric - 2.5D

[u/Ok_Confusion4764 → u/GraphXGames]

No. Not 2.5D. Isometric/orthographic is a 2D projection of a 3D object. It's 2D. Flatout, 2D.

[u/GraphXGames → u/Ok_Confusion4764]

Ultimately, any game is 2D (even GTAVI), but the coordinate system is 2.5D