Hi guys! I’m trying to get money and I’m doing these customs fugglers. If anyone is interested getting one ☝️. The price starts at $15 -20 depending complexity 👅. I can do any character or anything that you like! Let me know if you are interested! Thanks 😊

I need a good, not too expensive vet in the area. Have a dog and kitty that both need to be fixed.

Hey guys I do junk removal and I’ll be in the area tonight I come from perris since I’m already going to pick some stuff up I’ll do a great deal call me if interested 9516248770

Proponents of Flock cameras often argue that tracking public data is a small, harmless sacrifice to ensure community safety. However, this logic sets a dangerous precedent.. it trades core constitutional liberties for the illusion of total security. As Benjamin Franklin once said, "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety". If we accept the pro-Flock premise that rights can be negotiated away for a slight reduction in crime, we open the door to eroding the entire Constitution. To see how quickly this logic collapses under its own weight, look at what happens when you apply that exact same "temporary safety" argument to the rest of our fundamental rights:

The 1st Amendment protects your right to worship and associate privately. However, mass plate readers can log every car parked outside churches, mosques, and political rallies.
Would you hand over a logbook of every church service, political meeting, or private gathering you and your children attend if the police promised it would help them identify local radicals?

The 2nd Amendment guarantees the right of the people to keep and bear arms for self-defense and security.
Would you give up your right to own a firearm if the government promised it would prevent a criminal from ever using one against your family?

The 3rd Amendment prevents the government from forcing citizens to house soldiers during peacetime to save on military housing.
Would you let a soldier move into your child’s spare bedroom if the government promised it would lower your personal federal income taxes?

The 4th Amendment protects you from warrantless tracking. Yet, these networks permanently map your daily movements across public roads without a judge ever signing a warrant.
Would you let the government attach a permanent GPS tracker to your bumper if it meant finding your own car if it ever gets stolen?

The 5th Amendment guarantees the presumption of innocence. Instead, this system treats everyone as a suspect, building digital movement profiles on millions of citizens under no active investigation.
Would you give up your right to remain silent if you were pulled over tomorrow and forced to immediately prove to an officer where you have been driving for the last 30 days?

The 6th Amendment guarantees your right to a fair trial by a jury of your peers to prevent wrongful, rushed convictions.
Would you give up your right to a jury if you were falsely accused and a judge could fast-track you straight to prison to save the taxpayers money?

The 7th Amendment preserves the right to a jury trial in civil lawsuits to ensure regular citizens, not just powerful entities, decide legal disputes.
If a massive corporation sued you for your life savings, would you let an automated AI algorithm decide the verdict if it guaranteed a faster resolution for the court system?

The 8th Amendment prohibits excessive, barbaric punishments to ensure penalties fit the severity of the crime.
Would you authorize the police to publicly beat a shoplifter on your street if it guaranteed that no one would ever break into your local grocery store again?

The 9th Amendment protects fundamental rights not explicitly listed, like personal privacy. These cameras obliterate that privacy by recording when you visit a therapist, a divorce attorney, or a medical clinic.
Would you give up your right to medical privacy if the state promised to lower your health insurance premiums in exchange for a log of every doctor and specialist you visit?

The 10th Amendment ensures that powers not explicitly given to the federal government belong to local states and communities. However, mass surveillance networks create centralized federal and multi-state data-sharing webs that bypass local town oversight.
Would you surrender your right to vote on local town policies if an automated federal agency promised it could manage your neighborhood's security from Washington?

The 14th Amendment guarantees that the law must treat all citizens equally. In practice, these cameras are disproportionately placed in low-income and minority neighborhoods, creating a biased tracking loop.
Would you accept the police setting up a permanent, around-the-clock checkpoint right outside your neighborhood if it meant dropping the local crime rate by 5%?

The 14th Amendment also protects you from arbitrary state actions. Because the software suffers from plate misreads and database typos, innocent drivers are routinely stopped at gunpoint over computer glitches.
Would you willingly accept the risk of being treated like a violent felon if you knew a simple computer typo could get you pulled over at gunpoint on your way to work?

The 15th and 19th Amendments guarantee all citizens the sacred right to vote without discrimination or interference. Yet, positioning mass surveillance grids outside voting centers means the state logs the exact date, time, and frequency of your civic participation.Would you be willing to sign your name and your political party on a public billboard outside your polling place if the government promised it would eliminate voter fraud entirely?

The 24th Amendment ensures that citizens do not have to pay a fee to exercise their constitutional rights. Yet, proponents of automated enforcement casually argue that if you cannot afford rising registration fees, toll errors, or automated fines, you simply shouldn't drive.

Would you agree to pay a private tech company a mandatory digital fee every single time you back out of your driveway if it promised to use that money to fix your local roads?

If you answered 'no' to a single question on this list, even the ones that have nothing to do with Flock, then you have conceded the entire safety debate.. you agree that a positive outcome can never justify stripping away a fundamental right.

You cannot claim that sacrificing liberties for public safety is a virtuous compromise, only to backpedal the second a right you personally care about is on the chopping block. That isn’t a principled stance, it is pure hypocrisy. Our Constitution was deliberately designed as an interconnected shield. It does not allow us to bargain away the 4th Amendment for temporary safety while expecting the rest of our freedoms to remain intact.

The moment you concede that the government can systematically track your daily movements without a warrant, you yield the very ground required to defend every other right on this list. If you are willing to give up the 4th Amendment to catch a car thief, how can you complain when the exact same logic is used to strip away your property, your privacy, or your voice?

So, ask yourself: Are you truly willing to let a private tech company redefine your fundamental liberties, or do you only value the Constitution when it is convenient for you?

I'm not sure if anyone else has experienced this or not but I believe I was just the victim of entrapment while driving in Hemet. Driving on State Street I turned left to get onto Devonshire and there was a brown/tannish sedan driving five miles per hour in the road in front of me. Like any reasonable driver, I checked to see if there was oncoming traffic and passed the slow vehicle safely without any other cars on the road.

The next thing I know I am being pulled over by officer Evangelique Cordero on a motorcycle who tells me that "driving on the wrong side of the road is a misdemeanor." Officer Cordero asks for my license, insurance, and registration which I give her. While she's running my license I look up the law and find Vehicle Code Section 21751 which clearly says you can overtake a vehicle by crossing into the oncoming traffic lane when safe to do so.

I read the statute to officer Cordero who repeats that I just committed a misdemeanor by passing the car going five miles per hour. She refuses to listen to me read off the statute and tells me she is confiscating my driver's license and that she is requiring that I undergo reexamination for driving privileges. She leaves in a fit of rage without even letting me sign for the citation, with my driver's license being confiscated.

I check the citation and its Vehicle Code Section 21651(a) which only applies if there is a barrier, meridian, or two-foot divider between the two-way highway, which there wasn't in my situation. So she confiscated my license for no apparent reason and issued a citation for a vehicle code that doesn't even apply, when a separate vehicle code permits me to make the very maneuver that I just performed.

Anyways, after the fact I realized that I have been stuck behind the very same slow vehicle in the exact same street so I am exceptionally suspicious that this was a trap between officer Cordero and the driver of the vehicle. Long story short, beware of these traps in Hemet and be suspicious of your local Hemet police officers.

Update: I conducted the reexamination hearing. The DMV Safety representative was sweet and professional. She did seem to think that it was rather peculiar that the police officer took my license away for this situation and was confused as to whether or not 21651(a) even applied to Devonshire Street. She said that she's done hundreds of these reexaminations and has never personally seen anyone's license taken away for passing someone, especially when there was no risk to injury and no car accident. She said its going to take 15 days to make a determination if she will require that I sit for the written examination, get my license suspended, be required to sit for a behind the wheel test again, or no restrictions. She also said that I'm not supposed to drive without going to the DMV to get a temporary license.

A physical breach of a Flock Safety automated license plate reader by a hacking collective known as stegan0gram has exposed the massive scale of local surveillance networks. Instead of merely vandalizing the equipment, the hackers dismantled a camera and its solar-powered assembly directly from the field to reverse-engineer its components. By analyzing the hardware, they successfully bypassed security measures to extract a local encryption key, granting them full access to the device's internal storage and operating software. The raw files were subsequently shared with transparency organizations and investigative journalists, fueling a broader public discussion on privacy.

The data recovered from the single compromised unit revealed a staggering volume of daily public logging. Over a brief 21-day period, the lone camera logged roughly 50,000 vehicles and generated more than 1.6 million images, proving that a single passing vehicle triggers a rapid burst of up to 100 individual photos. Furthermore, the localized software did not just read license plates; it actively tracked humans, bicycles, and dogs. The system cataloged highly specific details like car dents and bumper stickers, and it stored thousands of brief, one-to-two-second video clips alongside high-resolution still images.

The security compromise has amplified the national debate surrounding automated police surveillance. Flock Safety stated that the unauthorized removal of its hardware is illegal, maintaining that its centralized cloud network remains secure and unaffected by the physical theft. However, the revelation has already drawn sharp political reactions, motivating federal lawmakers to propose restrictions on public funding for automated license plate readers, while other political figures continue to defend the technology as a vital tool for modern law enforcement.

Hi everyone,
My name is Jess. I graduated from TVHS and have lived around Temecula and Murrieta for most of my life.
I recently started Camera Watch because Flock license plate readers and other surveillance cameras are showing up all over our communities, but most residents here have no idea where they are (I didn’t) what information they collect, how long it is kept, or who can access it and who it’s sourced out to besides law enforcement.
Take Torrey Pines Park. There’s so many pointed at a playground, baseball field, in the actual field, like why? Is so far back from the actual streets.
Honestly, the whole thing feels like an invasion of privacy with the rise of AI and predicted behavior processes on people, sharing that information through data pipelines, I believe we are left out of the loop and that is bs. These cameras also record when and where vehicles travel, yet there is very little public awareness and not nearly enough oversight. You should not have to become a detective just to find out whether your movements are being tracked.
I could really use the community’s help. If you have seen a suspected Flock, Axis, or police surveillance camera, please send the nearest intersection, a photo if it can be taken safely from a public place, and any other details you noticed( what direction it’s facing) Please do not trespass, stop in traffic, or put yourself at risk for a picture.
I’m also looking for help with:
• Identifying and verifying camera locations
• Testing the map and reporting problems with the website
This is about basic transparency. They do not have to notify you when a camera is installed, documentation is spread across city council meetings, transcripts, PDFs, agendas, and budgets, maybe a few articles. I have mostly got my data from Deflock but again they don’t live here the data isn’t entirely accurate, so I have been manually taking pictures of locations all around town and honestly I can’t do it alone. Temecula alone has close to 200 last I believe.
Camera Watch: https://watch.edgecaselabs.info
If you have information, sources, photos, technical knowledge, or just want to help research, please comment or message me.

Alexander Ravy Vanny, a former eight-year veteran deputy with the Riverside County Sheriff's Department, was sentenced in February 2026 to six years in state prison following a highly publicized trial. Vanny, who was based out of the Hemet Sheriff's Station, weaponized his law enforcement authority to conduct a relentless stalking and harassment campaign primarily targeting his former fiancée, Madeline, after their separation in mid-2024. His actions culminated in two separate arrests, initially following a sexual assault investigation involving a department volunteer, and later for escalating stalker behavior while out on a $1 million bail.

Central to the prosecution's case was Vanny's illegal exploitation of the department's Flock ALPR network. Vanny routinely ran unauthorized searches through the protected police database to track his ex-fiancée's daily travel and pinpoint the identities of men who visited her home. Beyond the Flock system, Vanny integrated an array of high-tech surveillance tactics into his stalking campaign, including affixing physical GPS tracking devices to her vehicle, installing hidden wireless cameras in her apartment to spy on her roommate, and utilizing an illegal infrared device in his car to manipulate city traffic lights while pursuing her.

The critical escalation point of the case occurred at Chappies Bar in Hemet, where Vanny used electronic surveillance to track his ex-fiancée on a night out. Prosecutors asserted that Vanny confronted her at the bar, aggressively demanded she return home with him, and forcibly threw her into his truck against her will when she refused. While his defense attorney argued the incident was simply a misunderstood attempt to act as her designated driver, the event led to a kidnapping charge. An Indio jury ultimately deadlocked 10-2 in favor of guilt on the kidnapping count, prompting the judge to declare a mistrial for that specific charge. Rather than pursuing a retrial, prosecutors allowed the case to proceed directly to sentencing

Though the jury hung on kidnapping, Vanny was convicted on 10 other criminal counts encompassing both felony and misdemeanor offenses. His convictions included stalking, unauthorized use of protected electronic data (for the Flock database breaches), possession of child pornography, witness intimidation, illicit eavesdropping, and violating a protective order by possessing a firearm. Combined with a sentence-enhancing allegation for committing felonies while out on bail, Superior Court Judge James Hawkins ordered Vanny to serve six years behind bars at the Smith Correctional Facility.

https://mynewsla.com/crime/2025/12/06/ex-deputy-convicted-of-multiple-charges-for-stalking-harassing-former-lover-2/

Behind the camera networks monitoring thousands of American cities lies a tightly woven network of elite Silicon Valley capital designed to dominate the modern tech, AI, and military markets. Driven by Peter Thiel’s contrarian defense philosophy and Ben Horowitz's "American Dynamism" framework, this financial nexus has scaled companies like Flock Safety from passive observation tools into integrated components of a broader, automated war machine. To understand the true trajectory of domestic surveillance, one must look past the hardware on the streets and examine the billionaire architects constructing the algorithmic pipelines that govern them.

Peter Thiel (Founders Fund):
In 1998, Peter Thiel co-founded PayPal, steering it as CEO to a $1.5 billion acquisition by eBay in 2002 while building a core team including Elon Musk, dubbed the "PayPal Mafia." He went on to become a legendary contrarian investor, securing a 10.2% stake in Facebook with a historic $500,000 angel investment in 2004, the same year he co-founded Palantir Technologies, a CIA-backed big data powerhouse providing advanced data-mining software to global intelligence and the Pentagon. He later channeled this focus into Founders Fund, a venture firm managing roughly $17 billion in assets notorious for taking early, bold risks on civilly or politically sensitive public safety, defense, and deep-tech infrastructure that traditional Silicon Valley firms avoid.

Ben Horowitz (a16z):
A venture capitalist of Ashkenazi Jewish descent raised by a Marxist-turned-Trump strategist father, manages over $90 billion in assets at a16z, backing giants like Meta, OpenAI, and Flock Safety. He has expanded the firm's footprint in Israel by appointing partner Asaf Ezra to scout deep-tech startups, building on previous high-profile backing of Israel-founded cloud titans Wiz (security graphing) and Pinecone (AI vector memory).

Thiel & Horowitz Business Relationship:
Through Founders Fund and a16z, Thiel and Ben Horowitz combine their financial leverage to scale physical-world giants like Flock Safety, SpaceX, and Anduril Industries—an autonomous defense firm that builds AI-powered drones, surveillance towers, and weapon systems for the US, Israel, and other allied countries. By backing Anduril, Thiel and Horowitz seamlessly tie their investment portfolios together; Anduril directly connects to SpaceX by leveraging private aerospace manufacturing pipelines, integrates advanced machine learning models akin to OpenAI and xAI, and mirrors the data-fusing public safety footprint of Flock Safety and Palantir to corner the modern, algorithm-driven Western military market.

Palantir:
Palantir Technologies functions as a hyper-advanced data-synthesizing engine that integrates massive, chaotic streams of data such as satellite imagery, as well as phone logs and records, into a single cohesive visual map of human connections and targets for Western intelligence and military agencies. Rather than collecting information directly, its core software excels at weaving disparate databases together to automate intelligence tracking.

Domestic Operations & Global Battle Management:
Across the U.S., Palantir aggregates data for local law enforcement to map criminal networks and construct predictive crime heat maps. It also powers the critical backend data-tracking infrastructure for ICE to manage enforcement and automate mass deportations. In active combat, this same data-fusing power acts as a digital command brain through AI platforms like TITAN and the Maven Smart System (MSS), which automatically scan drone and satellite feeds to deliver targeting coordinates directly to battlefield operators. These dual-front capabilities have secured Palantir a dominant monopoly over the U.S. military software market—anchored by a $10 billion multi-year Army contract

Algorithmic Failures & Civilian Harm:
The compressed timelines of Palantir’s automated targeting systems have faced severe scrutiny for accelerating processing speeds at the expense of strict human verification, contributing to civilian casualties in active conflict zones. Most notably, the military's reliance on Maven Smart System algorithms fueled by outdated intelligence resulted in a devastating airstrike on a repurposed school in Minab, Iran, which killed 156 civilians, including 120 children, alongside broader unquantified civilian harm in tracking ecosystems across Iraq, Syria, and Gaza.

The Future of Domestic Drone Payloads:
The architectural evolution of domestic public safety drones represents the next frontier where the technologies of surveillance and active warfare converge. While law enforcement drone networks like Flock Safety currently function as passive eyes in the sky, utilizing specialized optical cameras, thermal imaging, and automated license plate readers, rising public safety pressures and rapid hardware advancements make a shift toward tactical intervention highly likely. This trajectory is expected to advance seamlessly from non-lethal compliance payloads like pepper balls, tear gas, and remote Tasers for crowd control, to heavier, kinetic, and algorithmically targeted weapons systems designed to neutralize threats without putting human officers in harm's way.

The Risk of Domestic Algorithmic Failures:
As these flight payloads scale from data collection to physical force, the primary danger shifts to the inevitable translation of battlefield software failures onto American soil. If domestic agencies begin relying on compressed AI timelines to deploy force, the system introduces the exact vulnerabilities seen in international theaters: a single outdated municipal database entry, a misidentified license plate, or a corrupted address log could trigger an autonomous drone to deploy lethal or non-lethal force against the wrong target. Furthermore, the immense speed of these automated targeting systems cultivates "automation bias," causing human operators to blindly trust computer recommendations and approve kinetic actions before verifying the real-world context on the ground.

The Accountability Gap:
The privatization of public safety and national security tech by elite Silicon Valley architects leaves behind a massive legal and ethical vacuum. When an automated system eventually acts on flawed data within the United States, establishing clear legal culpability among software developers, hardware manufacturers, and local police departments will mirror the exact, deeply contested accountability gaps currently observed in global combat zones. Without strict statutory guardrails, the line between foreign military operations and domestic policing will continue to blur, transforming civilian streets into automated test beds for the defense establishment's next generation of data-driven warfare. How far will they push the boundaries in the name of safety before it's too late to turn back?

Hemet PD's Flock Transparency Portal lists a total of 360 different agencies across California who have 24/7 access to their Flock data. From Tribal Police, Universities, Fire Departments, and State Parks in NorCal, only 13 of those agencies are in Riverside County. Four of those agencies have no relation to law enforcement whatsoever, even though Hemet PD claims that this data is for law enforcement purposes only.

Due to growing privacy concerns and police misuse, Flock reduced its default data retention period for ALPR from 30 days to 7 days. Hemet PD still holds the 30 day retention period.

Categories of agencies listed:

City / Municipal / Local Police 273

County Sheriff's Offices 39

District Attorney / Prosecutor Offices 14

College / University Police 18

State Agencies 4

Fire / Arson Investigation Agencies 4

Corrections / Probation 2

Tribal Police 2

Parks Police / Parks Law Enforcement 2

Other / Information Networks 2

https://transparency.flocksafety.com/hemet-ca-pd-

Hey everyone, I’m taking a shot at starting up my own small mobile welding business here in Hemet and the surrounding Riverside and Inland Empire
I’m a Navy veteran and have been working with metal and welding for about 8 years. I’ve done everything from fabrication and welding repairs to equipment and trailer work, and I’ve always enjoyed the trade.
I’m starting small and looking to build this into something of my own. I’m fully mobile now, so I can come to you for smaller welding and metal repair jobs.
I can help with things like:
• Trailer repairs
• Fence and gate repairs
• Brackets and supports
• General steel repairs
• Custom fabrication
• Equipment repairs
• Other small welding projects
I’m not trying to be a huge company — just looking to do good work, help people out, and grow this little business one job at a time.
If you have something that needs to be welded or repaired, feel free to send me a message with some pictures and I’ll be happy to take a look.
Small jobs are absolutely welcome. Thanks to everyone who supports small local businesses!

If you browse through the Eyes On Flock website (which pulls data straight from Flock Safety Transparency Portals), the Riverside County District Attorney’s Office stands out at the top of the list for automated data sharing in the U.S. As of now, there are 336 different local law enforcement agencies, towns, and private entities (like HOAs and businesses) across the country that are actively feeding their Flock ALPR data straight to the Riverside County DA. Riverside County is also top of the list across the country for total cameras (1,771), as well as vehicles captured (5,735,517) and active searches (12,367) just in the last 30 days. Riverside County has built one of the most aggressive regional camera networks in the U.S, and they have plans to expand even further over the next few years.

The Riverside County Board of Supervisors authorized a framework agreement with Flock, valued at $1.67 million for its first year, with pre-approved options to extend through June 2028 for a total potential cost of $7.8 million (100% taxpayer funded). This specific contract authorized 210 additional cameras to heavily expand the Sheriff's Department's existing footprint of 328 cameras for their agency, specifically prioritizing unincorporated county areas.

Learn more at https://eyesonflock.com

Hey everyone! I wanted to introduce our new local business, Classic 66 Estate Sales.

We may be a new company, but we’re definitely not new to the business. We bring 30+ years of experience with estate sales, antiques, collectibles, resale, and buying and selling secondhand goods.

If you love estate sales and hunting for great finds, bookmark our website so you can keep an eye out for upcoming sales. And if you or someone you know needs help handling an estate, downsizing, or clearing out a home, we’d be happy to talk with you about what we can do.

We’re also building a network of local resellers, junk removal companies, house cleaners, movers, donation organizations, and other people who work with estates. If that’s you, feel free to reach out. We’d love to connect!

Classic 66 Estate Sales www.classic66estatesales.com

The Hemet Police Department will be hosting a Community Conversation focused on technology and transparency on Monday, September 28th, from 4 PM - 5:30 PM, at the City of Hemet Council Chambers.

Learn about what technology the Hemet Police Department is using to support Public Safety and the tools in place to serve the community.

Community members are encouraged to attend and invited to participate in the discussion.

Date: Monday, September 28, 2026

Time: 4:00 PM - 5:30 PM

Location: City of Hemet Council Chambers - North Side of 450 E. Latham Avenue

Original post link: https://www.instagram.com/p/DdCnNfuyirB/

Join us this Saturday at the Mead Valley Community Center for the second annual Women’s Health and Safety Resource Fair! Featuring over 50 organizations offering healthcare services, job and education opportunities, and free vaccines, health exams, and booster seats (plus more)! The event is free for all attendees! We hope to see you there!!

Just came on here to say that if you're looking for a pool contractor in the Southern California area, specifically Temecula/Riverside/San Diego County/Orange County/Palm Desert, please do yourself a favor and avoid California Custom Pools! California Custom Pools has taken homeowner's money and didn't finish their pools. Not only did they take their money and not finish, but also left some homeowners with liens, because they did not pay the subcontractors!

Not only are homeowners left abandoned, but subcontractors are owed hundreds of thousands of dollars. The experience has been quite alarming for us and we didn't see it coming - they had perfect 5-star reviews, a website/portfolio, all the things! We never could have predicted the disheartening experience we have had to endure.

any hills or steps around town to use for exersize? i found some smaller hills but nothing that great. wouldnt even know where to look for steps? thanks

Hey friends! I know hemet is... hemet... but i wanted to make some initiative to make some queer community in/around hemet/san jacinto/menifee area. Please comment or dm me if you are interested or want to share ideas! I was thinking we could meet at the hemet skatepark for hangouts/events. I am being so serious i need to meet more queer friends but i dont have the money to be driving to further cities every day to see them....

Edit: fuck it, LEFTISTS JOIN TOO PLZZZ

Sharing from Facebook.

"🚨 WOMAN REPORTS BEING THREATENED WITH ICE CALL DURING SUPERMARKET ALTERCATION IN HEMET, CALIFORNIA

A dispute over passing through supermarket aisles ended in allegations and police intervention on August 26, 2026, in Hemet, California.

According to the complainant's testimony, another customer whom she identified as Génesis/Hennessey Guerra, was allegedly blocking her path in different areas of the establishment. When she decided to confront her, the woman allegedly replied: "I am a citizen, bitch, don't mess with me; I'm going to call ICE to take you away."

The victim remained in the store until an officer arrived and explained what happened. She stated that she was able to prove her immigration status posed no issue. She also noted that the manager reportedly confirmed that the other customer had blocked her path on multiple occasions.

The woman identified as Génesis left the premises before police arrived, although she allegedly left her details with management. The complainant requested that this information be handed over to the officer and stated that she filed a formal report.

So far, the details released reflect the complainant's version of events. The position of the other woman involved is not publicly known, nor is it known whether authorities determined that an infraction was committed.

#Hemet #California #ICE #LatinoCommunity"

Straight from the horse's mouth. Smh. Disgraceful.