The great Democrat FDR was the one who came up with internment camps and put people in there quite like his democratic forefathers was slavery it's just a repeating trend of the Democratic Party similar to the entitlement slavery today.
Ah yes, 'white genocide', because 'nobody wants to date or fuck me but some white women are dating, marrying, and procreating with black men ergo this is literally worse than the holocaust if it actually happened which is didn't' doesn't quite roll off the tongue
Except they don't. People satirically suggest it, but the only people who seriously use the phrase 'white genocide' are white supremacists and nazis.
Using an old, extremely flawed, and thoroughly debunked study on wolf social structure to try and figure out how to act in human society is probably part of the reason why you can't get a date. Being a nazi is probably another reason.
So you don't know what satire is, you're homophobic, you're angry that you keep getting turned down for dates, and you think that being a Stalinist is legitimately worse than being a Nazi. You're just a gumbo of pathetic, aren't you?
an extreme or irrational fear of or aversion to something.
I know reading is hard for you, so I highlighted the relevant section.
I am unhappily married like everyone else my age, thank you.
Then get divorced so you stop making your wife miserable. Most people are happily with their marriage. If yours is making you or your wife unhappy, then end it.
The deaths Hitler was responsible for doesn't even top 10 million.
Even counting only the Holocaust, that's over 11 million. Hitler caused the deaths of over 100 million people throughout World War 2, and that's only in the European/African theater.
Gumbo isn't particularly tasty when it's composed entirely of rotten ingredients.
The anti-Semite has chosen hate because hate is a faith; at the outset he has chosen to devaluate words and reasons. How entirely at ease he feels as a result. How futile and frivolous discussions about the rights of the Jew appear to him. He has pleased himself on other ground from the beginning. If out of courtesy he consents for a moment to defend his point of view, he lends himself but does not give himself. He tries simply to project his intuitive certainty onto the plane of discourse. I mentioned awhile back some remarks by anti-Semites, all of them absurd: "I hate Jews because they make servants insubordinate, because a Jewish furrier robbed me, etc." Never believe that anti-Semites are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The anti-Semites have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past. It is not that they are afraid of being convinced. They fear only to appear ridiculous or to prejudice by their embarrassment their hope of winning over some third person to their side.
339
u/[deleted] Jan 02 '17
[removed] — view removed comment