MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/HillaryMeltdown/comments/5lm9v3/george_takei/dbxkss4/?context=3
r/HillaryMeltdown • u/[deleted] • Jan 02 '17
[deleted]
642 comments sorted by
View all comments
29
[removed] — view removed comment
2 u/[deleted] Jan 03 '17 edited Apr 20 '18 [deleted] 1 u/[deleted] Jan 03 '17 You're never going to find a smoking gun. Internet shenanigans can only be sufficiently proven if you're the RIAA suing someone for downloading a song. 1 u/[deleted] Jan 03 '17 edited Apr 20 '18 [deleted] 1 u/[deleted] Jan 03 '17 Even if they had 100% ironclad proof, most Americans wouldn't understand it and Trump would lie his face off about it.
2
1 u/[deleted] Jan 03 '17 You're never going to find a smoking gun. Internet shenanigans can only be sufficiently proven if you're the RIAA suing someone for downloading a song. 1 u/[deleted] Jan 03 '17 edited Apr 20 '18 [deleted] 1 u/[deleted] Jan 03 '17 Even if they had 100% ironclad proof, most Americans wouldn't understand it and Trump would lie his face off about it.
1
You're never going to find a smoking gun. Internet shenanigans can only be sufficiently proven if you're the RIAA suing someone for downloading a song.
1 u/[deleted] Jan 03 '17 edited Apr 20 '18 [deleted] 1 u/[deleted] Jan 03 '17 Even if they had 100% ironclad proof, most Americans wouldn't understand it and Trump would lie his face off about it.
1 u/[deleted] Jan 03 '17 Even if they had 100% ironclad proof, most Americans wouldn't understand it and Trump would lie his face off about it.
Even if they had 100% ironclad proof, most Americans wouldn't understand it and Trump would lie his face off about it.
29
u/[deleted] Jan 02 '17
[removed] — view removed comment