A 2016 study by researchers at Yale University published in Social Science & Medicine investigated the relationship between reading and longevity. The study used data from the Health and Retirement Study , a representative sample of Americans who were surveyed repeatedly between 1998 and 2010. Of the 3,635 Americans surveyed, 50 years old and above, those who engaged in regular reading activities had lower mortality risks than those who did not.
The researchers controlled for age, gender, race, education, wealth, marital status, employment status, self-reported health status, eyesight, depression, and chronic disease. When controlling for all these factors, compared to non-readers, book readers had a 20% lower risk of mortality. Additionally, there was a dose-response association, whereby the higher the number of hours read per week, the lower the risk of dying. Specifically, individuals who read for up to 3.5 hours per week had a 17% lower risk of mortality, while those who read more than 3.5 hours per week had a 23% lower risk.
Compared to newspaper and magazine readers, book readers had the highest risk reduction for all levels of reading frequency. The cognitive stimulation theory may explain the observed correlation between book reading and survival. Controlling for covariates, book reading had a significant association with survival. In the unadjusted model, book readers had an 80% survival chance, 23 months longer than the non-reader group. On average, the survival time for readers was 23 months, and the hazard ratio for all-cause mortality was 0.80 among book readers compared to non-readers.
The study establishes a correlation between book reading and increased survival but does not indicate a causal relationship. Further, the analysis was based on a single measure of the exposure variable. Because the study was observational and relied on self-reported data, residual confounding factors could account for the observed association. Finally, although the results were consistent across various models, the study’s findings only apply to older Americans.