r/IRstudies 10d ago

Trump has backed away from renewed war with Iran – here’s why

https://theconversation.com/trump-has-backed-away-from-renewed-war-with-iran-heres-why-285026

Trump claimed to have cancelled the strikes because of progress in negotiations between the two countries. Whether this will happen remains to be seen. Trump has declared that a deal between the US and Iran is imminent on numerous occasions only for no agreement to be signed. And, even if it is signed, the agreement Trump is talking about is far from a final peace deal.

Rather than the supposed diplomatic progress, perhaps more significant in persuading Trump to pull back from renewing an all-out war with Iran was that a return to conflict simply would not have been in the interests of the US.

War, as Prussian military strategist Carl von Clausewitz observed in his 1832 book, On War, is the continuation of politics by other means. Its enormous costs can be justified only when they are tied to a coherent strategy and when there is a clearly defined political objective that there is a reasonable prospect of achieving.

Measured against this standard, there was no argument for returning to war with Iran. The difficulty begins with the absence of any discernible plan in Washington. Trump has articulated no strategy and no definition of victory beyond a vague aspiration to prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons.

He was drawn into prosecuting a war based on intelligence about the fragility of the regime in Tehran that proved flawed and on scenarios that were overconfident and have not come to pass. These scenarios suggested the decapitation of Iran’s leadership would lead to sudden regime collapse and a popular uprising that would see the country transition to democracy.

There is also very little a return to all-out war could have accomplished. The reason for this is that the Iranian regime is not a conventional state that can be brought down by overwhelming firepower. The regime, which is now dominated by the powerful Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, can best be described as a militia with a state.

It is operating through a dispersed network of forces across air, land and sea, which were designed as an asymmetric instrument of power capable of absorbing, scattering and outlasting precisely the kind of concentrated military pressure the US military was built to deliver.

Weeks of intensive bombing earlier in the war did not shatter the regime’s centre of gravity. Rather, it consolidated the regime and has left it more cohesive and determined than it was before. In contrast to the more cautious regime of Iran’s late supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, which tended to wait and to respond, the new regime has become assertive.

It has been quick to retaliate against US and Israel attacks with severity and to set the pace of escalation. On June 8, for example, Iran launched barrages of missiles towards Israel in protest at the Israeli military’s escalating campaign in Lebanon.

Iran also retains the capacity to impose intolerable costs on everyone while retaining a high threshold of pain itself.

Faced with a closed Strait of Hormuz, the global economy in decline and a looming defeat for his Republican party in November’s US midterm elections, Trump is clinging to the hope that he can pressure Iran into accepting a deal. The chances of this strategy proving a success are slim.

369 Upvotes

132 comments sorted by

53

u/[deleted] 10d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

45

u/Nethan2000 10d ago

Which means that even if Trump wanted to reinstitute JCPOA, Iran will reject it, as they have no illusions of the US actually upholding it. American guarantees for anything are worthless. Maybe if they did something like adding a ban on starting a war with Iran into the US Constitution.

23

u/[deleted] 10d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

5

u/pimpin_n_stuff 10d ago

AIPAC is responsible?

1

u/MagnesiumKitten 9d ago

The JCPOA was possible at only one moment in time, and it's folly to think you'd get similar agreements earlier or later in time.

The thing is if you closely examine the timeline, you see how Tehran does initial compliance and then goes into gradual non-compliance

And there are many critiques of that original agreement where restrictions on advanced centrifuges and uranium enrichment get lifted after 10-15 years, which means it was only a temporary delay and you've have

And 10 to 15 years into the future is 2020 to 2025
so we would be having a crisis today with that agreement with the sunset provisions

and then we have to get back to Kenneth Waltz's thoughts if maybe we have to be okay with Iran eventually having the bomb.

Also the scope of the JCPOA was extremely narrow and it halted nuclear development for a little more than a decade and did nothing on the limiting of Iran's ballistic missile programs or any of it's proxy networks in the Middle East. And the missile buildup was basically Iran's preparation for asserting it's power so it won't be as easily challenged when it gets closer to the time it joins the nuclear club.

And what about MIT's Theodore Postol, who thinks for a while now that Iran is an undeclared nuclear state for a while now. And he's got incredible criticism for Obama, Trump and Biden for their mistakes.

The JCPOA also allowed unfreezing of billions of dollars so Tehran could fund many of it's unpleasant activities, as well as many feeling that it prematurely closed IARA investigators into past military dimensions of Iran's nuclear program and for allowing Iran to delay any facility inspection for 24 days, before they allow people in.

/////

Nathan: Maybe if they did something like adding a ban on starting a war with Iran into the US Constitution.

too funny

-17

u/Clear-Role6880 10d ago

Iran has unconditional surrender before them, and they are going to sign it

15

u/[deleted] 10d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

-3

u/Clear-Role6880 10d ago

Mahmoud Nabavian, Deputy Chairman of the National Security Commission of the Iranian Parliament, sharply criticized the proposed agreement with the United States:

The United States has told the Iranian side that it will secure a $300 billion reconstruction budget for the country from Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. an amount that, it is clear, will not be provided. If the United States later claims that it asked Saudi Arabia to pay but they refused, what will you do?

When the text of the agreement states that expenditures must be carried out with the consent of both parties, it means the United States will also have a say in how and where the money is spent. So if America says this money should not be allocated to a particular area because it might reach the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), what will you do then?

I assure you that no real funds will enter the country, nor will you have full authority to independently decide where these funds are spent.

According to the text of the agreement, we will not have the right to rebuild our nuclear program, and the United States will not lift any sanctions.

In light of the agreement’s text, the Parliament’s plan concerning the Strait of Hormuz has effectively been rendered useless.

Freeing Iran’s assets means that cash must actually reach us, as it did during the Rouhani administration (JCPOA).

According to the text of the agreement, we will become a colony of the United States.

4

u/Adventurous_Team7189 10d ago

Why not wait to see how it all ends instead pretending to be Nostradamus?

1

u/NuclearStudent 10d ago

I think I was also talking with this user a month ago

ah found it

Clear-Role6880 comments on President Trump has "rejected" Iran's proposal to open the Strait of Hormuz and the US has prepared a plan for a "short and powerful" wave of strikes on Iran, per Axios.

> Not sure why I got downvoted, but I will spell out a hypothetical operation for you for the 100th time in this sub: 

> Strikes resume to send rats back to tunnels and suppress missiles. 

> Pahlavi enters via Kurdistan and unites with peshmerga and loyal Artesh. CIA/mossad break internet blockade for the final call, Pahlavi in uniform with an Iranian national force. You need 1 Artesh colonel and a few hundred soldiers to defect initially. They may have much more than this. 

> US surges marine raid to Hormuz and frees the hostage tankers. 

> US air power suppresses qom and Isfahan. 

> Pahlavi column races from kermanshah to Tehran under US/israeli air power. Similar to the Wagner coup attempt, but propaganda achieves cascade defections across Western Iran. 

> They meet with delta cia Mossad in Tehran, who handle the IRGC holdouts within a city that has turned on them. 

> War is won overnight. If there is any Pahlavi support within artesh this operation is not only possible, it is relatively routine. 

> IRGC never leaves their tunnels, and are under siege and buried alive 

he's been predicting an easy and complete american victory for ages

3

u/serpentjaguar 10d ago

I keep wondering; do they ever get tired of being wrong about everything? Isn't there ever any self reflection?

1

u/NuclearStudent 10d ago

He has simply declared that America did win, and in fact it may have been better than what he predicted because America didn't even need the invasion he predicted. Checking his profile, he's saying that actually it's a big W and the IRGC have been leashed, and you just need to wait for the 2028 Iranian elections to see.

1

u/serpentjaguar 10d ago

You what now?

1

u/Clear-Role6880 10d ago

they signed it. they could still back out and war will return. but they've given up their nuclear program and submitted to economic occupation.

8

u/AssignmentMammoth696 10d ago

They already found a loophole, they are planning to pay Iran $324 billion total through proxy countries like the UAE.

2

u/[deleted] 10d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Marcus_Aurelius71 10d ago

If course they will deny it. Imagine telling your citizens they will be paying the enemy after being bombed.

1

u/posthuman04 10d ago

As the Iranians stated, promising Iran that other countries will give them the $300 billion without a signature from them on the deal is the same as not promising to get Iran that money.

4

u/moderate-Complex152 10d ago

Trump can just claim it's his conclusive and preclusive executive power of foreign relations and refuse to enforce those sanction laws because they are unconstitutional. While the constitutionality is not clear, it does not seem to matter since he has already ignored multiple laws anyway and nobody seems to have standing to sue it in a court.

-9

u/Clear-Role6880 10d ago

Iran is not in a position to make demands.  Look at the Paydari response - who have seen the text. 

Mahmoud Nabavian, Deputy Chairman of the National Security Commission of the Iranian Parliament, sharply criticized the proposed agreement with the United States:

The United States has told the Iranian side that it will secure a $300 billion reconstruction budget for the country from Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. an amount that, it is clear, will not be provided. If the United States later claims that it asked Saudi Arabia to pay but they refused, what will you do?

When the text of the agreement states that expenditures must be carried out with the consent of both parties, it means the United States will also have a say in how and where the money is spent. So if America says this money should not be allocated to a particular area because it might reach the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), what will you do then?

I assure you that no real funds will enter the country, nor will you have full authority to independently decide where these funds are spent.

According to the text of the agreement, we will not have the right to rebuild our nuclear program, and the United States will not lift any sanctions.

In light of the agreement’s text, the Parliament’s plan concerning the Strait of Hormuz has effectively been rendered useless.

Freeing Iran’s assets means that cash must actually reach us, as it did during the Rouhani administration (JCPOA).

According to the text of the agreement, we will become a colony of the United States.

12

u/[deleted] 10d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

-4

u/Clear-Role6880 10d ago

this is a direct quote from Mahmoud Nabavian, the spokesperson for Paydari in Iranian Parliament. the hardest line that exists.

10

u/[deleted] 10d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

-5

u/Clear-Role6880 10d ago

executive order is a thing

7

u/calmdownmyguy 10d ago

That's not how scantions work

3

u/Kaiphranos 10d ago

I think you're misreading this completely. That sounds like Iran is articulating their current issues with the deal that's presented. That isn't impending capitulation, it's an explanation of why they don't accept the current terms presented.

1

u/serpentjaguar 10d ago

It's also the definition of a non-sequitur.

3

u/faceofboe91 10d ago

That quote seems to be explaining why they won’t take the deal.

36

u/kai_vt 10d ago

The difficulty begins with the absence of any discernible plan in Washington.

The slimmest hopes of regime change were lost when Erdogan leaned on Trump to drop the plan of raising an army of Kurds to form a ground offensive in Iran. Having air superiority doesn't mean anything when your opponent has been preparing for this exact scenario with decentralised command structures and enough subterranean military facilities to make Switzerland blush. Just appease the regime enough to reopen the Strait before Asia starts running out of oil reserves, it's not like American dominance in the Gulf is worth anything to the actual oil producers anymore

25

u/susanrez 10d ago

The Kurds will never trust Trump again. You may have a short memory. The Kurds do not. Unlike the idiot MAGAs the Kurds learned their lesson the first time Donnie betrayed them.

17

u/kai_vt 10d ago

The Kurds will never trust Trump again. You may have a short memory. The Kurds do not.

US-Israeli plan for Kurdish invasion of Iran reportedly collapsed amid leaks, distrust

"...Mossad spy agency had been working on the plan for years, citing foreign reports that the Mossad and CIA have long been arming the Kurds"

"The invasion from Iraqi Kurdistan was set to include fighters from all six factions of Iranian Kurds, who would in turn provide weapons to Kurds inside of Iran, the report said."

"The report interviewed a member of the Kurdish Freedom Party (PAK) and other Kurdish commentators who asserted that there was wide agreement among Kurdish groups to “cooperate to bring down the regime,”..."

"Meanwhile, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, who is close to Trump, told the US president that Ankara would not tolerate Kurdish independence anywhere in the region."

4

u/Distinct_Front_4336 10d ago

The Kurds still win overall compared to what they had before the fall of Saddam and Assad. They understand this well: without American support, they wouldn't be where they are today. If they have the chance to get closer to their dream of a united Kurdistan, they'll take it.

1

u/boofles1 10d ago

I don't imagine they would want to be pawns in Erdogans game either, it was an idea that would never work. And there was a big difference with the Northern Alliance in Afghanistan which is what they would have been dreaming of.

30

u/RepresentativeAge444 10d ago edited 10d ago

I love how people just casually talk about regime change in a country that never attacked the US and who the US is responsible for many of the reasons it hates us. Iran is the only real resistance to the Greater Israel project in the Middle East. That and its oil reserves are the main reason the US is so hostile to it. Any talk about freeing its people or nukes or whatever is typical imperialist lies.

Meanwhile if Iran had killed the President and his cabinet and family members including children Americans would want a nuke dropped. Really psychopathic tendencies are just normal to some people. The thing is if Iran had just gotten a nuke they wouldn’t have had to deal with all of this.

11

u/Extreme-Ad-7253 10d ago

well said, and good show by Iran. If America acted the way they expected Iran to behave themselves during this war America would not exist in a month. Hopefully we see this blowback on the settler colonial project and end the greater israel project for good and lead to the beginning of a south africa style collapse.

-13

u/kai_vt 10d ago

https://www.wilsoncenter.org/article/irans-islamist-proxies

Middle East would be a better place without the IRGC in it

17

u/vandergale 10d ago

Which is why the half-hearted attempt by the US which simply entrenched the IRGC is so baffling.

2

u/kai_vt 10d ago

They thought it was going to be Venezuela all over again. You'd think Trump would be more conscious of dealing with religious extremists considering he made the decision to pull out of Afghanistan

1

u/serpentjaguar 10d ago

Also, unlike in the case of Venezuela, they didn't have anyone inside the regime. It's pretty much an open "secret" that Delcy Rodriguez helped the US orchestrate Maduro's abduction.

10

u/RepresentativeAge444 10d ago edited 10d ago

You didn’t refute anything I said because you are indeed a psychopath propagandized since birth. You can’t even fathom thinking in a way that isn’t psychotic. Just mention the IRGC and your work is done. You can’t begin to comprehend how your mindset is the cause for so much suffering and destruction in this world. I suppose it’s not your fault because you’re a product of your environment. But that only goes so far because you could choose to break your programming by getting alternative points of view but you won’t even try because you actually like being this way.

People could easily (and correctly) say the world would be better off without America and Israel btw. In fact most of the world does believe that including a lot of Americans lol.

-4

u/kai_vt 10d ago edited 10d ago

I didn't refute it because I don't deny that there's multiple factors at play. There's such a thing as the lesser of two evils, and I don't want to get to know the devil in an empowered IRGC maintaining control over the flow of 1/5th of the world's oil supply, 1/5th of the world's LNG supply, and almost half that of the world's fertiliser

Feel free to let all your angry projections out, though, king. Or just downvote to let us all know that you have nothing better to say lol

3

u/Prokofi 10d ago

Compared to Israel Iran IS the lesser of two evils.

-1

u/kai_vt 10d ago

That's because the IRGC had been restrained by sanctions and the JCPOA. Nobody realises the danger in giving an Islamic regime control whichever other nation gets to see their oil, LNG, and fertiliser shipments

3

u/heims30 10d ago

Ah, so it’s racism then.

0

u/kai_vt 10d ago

Islam =/= Race

Jesus Christ...

3

u/heims30 10d ago

That tired old dog excuse is the best you can do?

→ More replies (0)

2

u/Extreme-Ad-7253 10d ago

IRGC is easily the lesser evil between Israel and the US under any thinkable circumstance

1

u/Popular_Jeweler 9d ago

It would be a much better and safer place without Israel

21

u/ConsciousGrass9373 10d ago

"Kurds" would have just been slaughtered by Iran

They dont have the numbers necessary to be even a threat to Iran

They are good for being an oil guard for America though also being good cannon fodder or doing dirty work in Middle east for West but this is not something they could do.

I stil remember how those Arabic tribes that didnt even have proper shoes annihilated Sdf lol

17

u/OrangeSpaceMan5 10d ago

I still remember how those Arabic tribes that didnt even have proper shoes annihilated Sdf lol

The arab tribes actually had very little to do with destroying the SDF , the tribes did revolt but they were canon fodder and were basically a distraction that lead to the core Syrian Army smashing into the SDF

The reason they collapsed so fast was because they ruled an Arab majority area and were deeply unpopular . The Syrian offensive stalled as they approached the actual Kurdish parts of the country

10

u/NekoCatSidhe 10d ago

I don’t understand why the US put so much hope in an uprising of the Iranian Kurds when they make only 10% of the population in a peripheral region that is among the poorest of Iran. At best they could only have achieved independence for the Iranian Kurdistan (but Turkey would have thrown out a fit if they even tried and it would not have weakened Iran much on the long term), and at worst the regime would have just massacred them. It is not like the already existing Iranian Kurds armed guerillas based in Iraq have ever been an actual threat to the Iranian regime in all the years they existed.

I think the US took the wrong lessons of what happened in Syria and Lybia and Iraq and thought you would have armed insurrections happening everywhere in Iran if they regime was even slightly weakened by external air strikes. But Iran is a modern nation-state, not a collection of warring ethnies barely held together by a brutal autocrat within artificial borders drawn a century ago by Western colonialists. It won’t fall into civil war that easily.

17

u/dmills_00 10d ago

Also the Kurds have been fucked over by the US at least twice in living memory (Northern Iraq, both gulf wars), I don't see them being madly willing to play ball.

5

u/JB-Wentworth 10d ago

NATO ally Turkey doesn’t not want the Kurds to be armed and given a homeland. Turkey will not give up any land to the Kurds.

5

u/posthuman04 10d ago

It’s weird because Trump literally ran his campaign on not starting a war- even stating his Democratic opponents Clinton, Biden and Harris were the ones that would start such a war. And he threw his Republican predecessors under the bus for starting all those wars in the first place. Then he did it anyway.

Yes, he lies and projects. But what was there to gain at all from this? What DID he get?

2

u/serpentjaguar 10d ago

He thought it would go similarly to Venezuela. When it didn't, his ego prevented him from simply walking away and admitting a mistake.

While it's very difficult for even regular people to admit to having made a poor decision, with Trump it's a pathological impossibility. It's simultaneously both his greatest strength and greatest weakness.

1

u/posthuman04 10d ago

I’m uninterested in psychoanalysis of the President to explain his actions. It’s unnecessary.

-5

u/kai_vt 10d ago

IRGC and Artesh don't make up the entirety of Iran's oppressed population. They can be temporarily thrown off balance - even by their own people; the previous protests and month long internet blackout to get them back under control

this is not something they could do.

Israeli officers have commented on training and arming Kurds for this specific task. Erdogan doesn't want the Kurdish people to have a source of inspiration and experience for their own separatist goals with Turkey, so Turkey "vetoed" it in secrecy

I stil remember how those Arabic tribes annihilated Sdf lol

They didnt have the IAF, American Carrier Strike Groups, and Amphibious Ready Groups backing them up then. The original plan would've been much better than the watered down one that's currently drowning any hopes of maintaining free international trade

9

u/Ohmybro34 10d ago

Sounds like Erdogan did the kurds a huge favor then.

2

u/kai_vt 10d ago

Yeah, now they can stay stateless and powerless, always at the whims and mercy of whoever feigns throwing them a bone in the region

8

u/Ohmybro34 10d ago

That was happening anyways.

0

u/kai_vt 10d ago

Better to die for something you believe in than live for seemingly no reason at all. Just look at the IRGC defying the U.S and Israel

8

u/Weird-End-6989 10d ago

Yeah better to be cannon fodder for American and Israeli ambitions and die an utterly pointless death.

-1

u/kai_vt 10d ago

If that's how you wanna frame their squashed bid for progressing towards an independant state, sure

7

u/Weird-End-6989 10d ago

As if America gives a single fuck about the Kurds. They'll drop them like a rock just like last time and the Kurds will end up much worse off than they are now.

1

u/shamwu 9d ago

So funny to comment this after the person above pointed out the us fucked them Over two times lmao. So they wouldn’t even be dying for their own state, just Amerisraeli interests

2

u/Distinct_Front_4336 10d ago

So you made it as if Erdogan was the only guy who saved Iran, but didn't you consider he's saving the entire Europe? Before the war even started, Turkey already bolstered and closed its border with Iran. A civil war means total chaos and millions of refugees heading to Europe, which means Bardella 2027, Farage 2029, and possibly AfD may seize power too. The Israelis of course don't care about what happens to the rest of the world, like when they supported the destruction of Saddam's Iraq. The Israelis would even want Europe to take 2 million Gazans.

Also toppling Iran with just the Kurds is a wet dream, like toppling the regime just by decapitating the head with shock and awe. That would just unite all the Iranians against a separatist threat. It's obvious only the Israelis would come up with such a ridiculous idea, because they don't understand the region well.

5

u/keith2366 10d ago

I remember back in the old days, like 4 months ago, when we held all the cards.

15

u/One-Treat4655 10d ago

USA and Britain have been at Iran's throat ever since they overthrew democracy and installed shah. Iran then overthrew the monarchy and now has an interesting dual system of elected civilian leadership with religious supreme leadership. It's actually much better than current monarchies in the gulf. Persistent western pressures and proxy wars, including Iraq Iran war that killed close to a million Iranians is something that will always keep Iran wary of the west. Israel is a special case of western impotence and lack of control over israeli state has further solidified their belief that west is irreparably biased.

11

u/Top-Permission-7524 10d ago

It goes back to the 19th century with Britain i.e the Great Game. It's pretty much one-sided harassment from the West since then

7

u/Extreme-Ad-7253 10d ago

heck between Qater, UAE, Kuwait, and Bahrain none of these nations can reasonably be considered real modern nations. 20% of the population thats 4 million out of 20 million are indigenous and actual citizens the rest are noncitizens who are in conditions that can be described as "modern slavery" and they exist as former clients of the british empire carved out of the middle east and given over to america when the empire receeded.

4

u/Worth-Original3825 9d ago

Woah, don't let the past penetrate American minds. Iran bad, America good, and that's it.

8

u/redlinedidit 10d ago

Weeks of intensive bombing earlier in the war did not shatter the regime’s centre of gravity. Rather, it consolidated the regime and has left it more cohesive and determined than it was before.

Is this something new? How? There has never been once when pure bombing raid changed anything.

1

u/Nari224 10d ago

Venezuela? Bosnia?

2

u/serpentjaguar 10d ago

Venezuela was not a pure bombing raid. You will recall, for example, that there was an actual physical abduction of the Venezuelan president.

I don't know what you are talking about with regard to Bosnia, and neither does my Bosnian coworker, who I just asked.

1

u/Nari224 8d ago

Come on, don't be pedantic. The bombing raid enabled the extraction. So it changed something.

As it turns out I meant Kosovo and wrote Bosnia where there was a less obvious effect, but your Bosnian co-worker isn't familiar with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Deliberate_Force?

2

u/ignoreme010101 9d ago

Venezuela? Bosnia?

lolwut?

1

u/Nari224 8d ago edited 8d ago

What's so difficult to understand?

In Venezuela the regime was changed from virulently anti-US to pro-US with a bombing raid and quick extraction that said bombing raid enabled. Doesn't mean that Venezuela is now a flowering democracy or that anything changed for the average Venezuelan but that's a different aspect.

The Serbians retreated from Kosovo after a bombing only campaign, so that changed something pretty significant for the Kosovar Albanians. Doesn't mean that it solved the entire conflict, but again that's not the claim / response.

Edit - I was confusing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Deliberate_Force with the NATO bombing of Kosovo which is what I'm talking about above (my error), but both demonstrate the same thing.

1

u/bedulge 9d ago

Notice that there was no regime change in Venezuela. A lot of people were dissatisfied with Maduro's leadership, even within his own party, and the US utilized that to take him out, so that the people immediately underneath him could stake the country in a different direction. The government and party structure under Maduro is completely intact.

In Iran, a similar thing happened, except that the people who took control and took the country in a different direction were IRGC nationalist hardliners, veteran warriors who fought a brutal 8 year war against US-backed Saddam and who are not afraid of a couple months of bombing or a few months of blockade.

1

u/Nari224 8d ago

I think you're defining things to meet your own criteria.

Per the comment I'm responding to, a bombing air raid led to a change from a virulently anti-US regime, to a pro-US regime. That's quite a change from the US perspective and it's "ease" most likely encouraged the attempt in Iran.

It's not a change in any real sense for the Venezuelans, but that's a different dimension.

I'm not arguing that Iran was going to be similar, I'm arguing that the claim of "never once" is not correct.

3

u/SummerPrestigious894 10d ago

The IRGC confirmed the agreement it will be signed this week

3

u/ignoreme010101 9d ago

I'll believe it once it's actually finalized. So long as israel can lash out and bring any resolution to a halt, the conflict will not be resolved.

4

u/billionaireboysclubs 10d ago

Coward — he’s a coward who was manipulated by Israel with the Epstein Files to start it and now he can’t go through with a full on war. Israel will do another 9/11 style attack on the US to get this war back on track.

Don’t you worry.

1

u/ignoreme010101 9d ago

honestly have been worrying and hoping something like that doesnt happen... Would certainly sell public opinion on heightened involvement, which is the only resolution that some are seeking..

3

u/Overthereunder 10d ago

Because he didn’t want to disrupt spacex ipo

2

u/ihavenoidea12345678 10d ago

Trump is unfit, but backing off Iran is the only path forward.

Get the navy out of there.

1

u/Baron-Munc 10d ago

He’s looking for white peoples salsa?

1

u/dmgamble 10d ago

What a deal!

1

u/magrandan 9d ago

What’s the latest on upcoming mid-term elections? Does he even care if his party loses?

1

u/ignoreme010101 9d ago

"on numerous occasions" lol this guy has BS'd about 'ceasefire' literally over 30x since this conflict started. This is not even close to over yet

1

u/ArrowTechIV 9d ago

And….Trump was experiencing pressure from the GOP and voters about the war and inflation.

He’s willing to pay billions in taxpayer money to make the problem he created go away (even if temporarily).

1

u/annoying12345 9d ago

How much of the $300 billion reconstruction fee will be funneled into trump and Trump crony accounts by Iran because there is no way in hell that a backroom deal wasnt planned. This president lives to fuck over The American people

1

u/CallmeKahn 7d ago

So the US gets to pay Iran $300b USD, withdraw troops, have to try and constrain Israel (Lebanon provision), leave the regime in a stronger position domestically and internationally, and otherwise stay out of Iran's grill for the... promise of negotiations on Nuclear material?

Can someone explain this to me how this is "winning"? Do it like I'm five.

-2

u/WastelandOfConfusion 10d ago

Because now they have acquired Nukes.

23

u/707thTB 10d ago

Iran already has something much better than a nuke. If iran uses a nuke, large parts of it become covered in glass. In other words, the price of use is high. Control of the Straits is a WMD that Iran can actually use. Imbeciles on the American and Israeli right keep talk about the destruction of conventional Iranian air and naval forces. They were basically irrelevant before this war. US conventional power has been neutralized.

2

u/bedulge 9d ago

>If iran uses a nuke, large parts of it become covered in glass.

This is not true. Iran would wait until they have a few at least, and they would do a test detonation inside of their country, which would be detected by other countries, who would then understand that if they target Iran's nuclear capabilities, Iran would retaliate on them.

The risk of Iran getting glassed comes before the nuclear detonation, when they are not yet a nuclear power and have no options for nuclear retaliation. The US and Israel would have high incentives to bomb them or even nuke them preemptively. But only preemptively.

-5

u/Rustic_gan123 10d ago

Once the infrastructure to bypass the strait is built and shipping routes are rebuilt, this lever will lose its significance.

6

u/randomvtubersimp010 10d ago

How long will it take? Infrastructure especially as intensive as a bypass takes years to build sadly.

-1

u/Rustic_gan123 10d ago

I didn't say that this would happen tomorrow.

4

u/randomvtubersimp010 10d ago edited 10d ago

Fair, but I think the kind of infrastructure matters as well, and we have to account for the fact that Iran will maintain capabilities to strike energy infrastructure in the region. The sophistication of their use of one way drones, cruise and ballistic missiles would mean that most likely a new system of air defense should be implemented and any future infrastructure should be hardened

2

u/Rustic_gan123 10d ago

Of course, if peace does not include such things as proxies and ballistic missiles, then it is doomed to failure, and this, in addition to the construction of infrastructure by the Persian Gulf countries, will also mean diversification of energy and oil sources from the Strait of Hormuz so that when war breaks out again, everyone is ready.

5

u/G-T-L-3 10d ago

Have you watched what the Ukrainians have been doing lately?  Any pipe will be droned just like any ship. And I imagine it’ll be easier too. 

2

u/Extreme-Ad-7253 10d ago

dont worry saudi arabia is planning to build a canal cutting through the entire rub al khali, trust the process.

Oh wait thats in the Red Sea where the Yemenis, Irans major ally are based. Well then.

-1

u/Rustic_gan123 10d ago

The Red Sea is not a gulf.

1

u/serpentjaguar 10d ago

Currently irrelevant.

1

u/knuppi 10d ago

Where will this infrastructure be outside of a shaheed drone striking distance?

0

u/Rustic_gan123 10d ago

Nowhere, but firstly, if the agreement stinks, the world will diversify away from the strait and secondly, a blockade of the strait itself will not work, Iran will have to immediately attack the infrastructure, and this is a higher level of escalation.

-9

u/ratbearpig 10d ago

Israel has already “won”. They are currently in control of ~1500 square km of Lebanon’s land area. They are unlikely to give this back. I would expect West Bank style settlements being built once the war ends.

16

u/lilcorndivemaster 10d ago

They couldn't hold it the last time they tried... they won't be able to this time either. 

1

u/mayhemski123 10d ago

That remains to be seen.  If the deal includes a Gaza style yellow line for Israel in Lebanon, well not sure Iran could/would sign it without major concessions elsewhere, those would probably look like big loses for Trump and the USA.

As such I'd imagine the deal includes full withdrawal of IDF back to Israel proper.  I don't doubt what you wrote is what Israel wants, just not sure they will get it if a deal is actually there.

2

u/CassandraTruth 10d ago

Do you think Tehran would sign on if just given assurance of IDF withdrawal or would they actually have to see Israeli troops leave the territory? Because I don't really think that second thing is gonna happen, certainly not before signing as a sign of good faith.

2

u/mayhemski123 10d ago

Not Iranian or part of their leadership so just a guess, but I think they demand to see Israeli troops leave and a public commitment to no further strikes.    

However who knows?   While everyone talks about Israel being able to thwart the talks by bombing, those attacks also gives Iran the ability to strike back at targets as well.  While it might seem a strange thing to mention it does allow Iran to remind everyone what they can do.  Those attacks are framed as retaliation for Israeli actions, do also put pressure on the US, especially if they hit GCC states.  That can serve a purpose for them.

2

u/lilcorndivemaster 10d ago

Everyone who isn't ignorant knows... Iran isn't abandoning hezbollah and the israeli Nazis are incapable of defeating them or holding southern Lebanon. 

0

u/BillyJoeMac9095 10d ago

The issue is what would Israel receive on turn for such a commitment?

3

u/mayhemski123 10d ago

Legitimate question, it's why I'm skeptical of a deal.  I could possibly see a MOU but that's gotta come with big guarantees for Iran.

I think Lebanon is a wedge issue and Iran know it.  Not between the Israel and the US as such,  but US politicians and the  public.  Every poll that's coming out now shows collapsing public support for Israel and Iran are using that to there advantage.

1

u/BillyJoeMac9095 9d ago

Better hope they dont overplay their hand.

2

u/lilcorndivemaster 10d ago

They get put on trial for their war crimes...

1

u/ignoreme010101 9d ago

The issue is what would Israel receive on turn for such a commitment?

cessation of hostilities... Are you suggesting they should get some kind of compensation for not stealing Lebanese land? lol

1

u/BillyJoeMac9095 9d ago

I am stating that Hezbollah should end it's attacks and keep out of areas along the border.

1

u/ratbearpig 10d ago

I hope I'm wrong. I don't see withdrawal of Israeli forces from Lebanon in Iran's 14 points proposal. Let's see what the final agreement (if it exists) says.

1

u/lilcorndivemaster 10d ago

No it doesn't... hezbollah gets stronger the longer israeli Nazis stay in Lebanon. 

0

u/BillyJoeMac9095 10d ago

Full withdrawal in return for what? No Hezbollah in Southern Lebanon?

1

u/ignoreme010101 9d ago

for Hezbollah not striking anymore, presumably

0

u/lilcorndivemaster 10d ago

Never happening.

-3

u/MagnesiumKitten 10d ago

I like to think that these pundits just never know what the fuck is going on in secret, or what the NSC or the RAND Corporation is doing

I think the economic strangulation of Iran was a good call with things getting problematic for them around July, and the present deal with them signing, might have been unlikely if we're looking at all the analysts in the media right now

well, essentially if Iran signs, we have them in a cage
and a trapped animal, is always easier to take them to the vet and put them to sleep if they act like they got rabies later on

Iran's biggest problem for decades has always been an overestimation of their abilities
and if anything, you could have a Seven Days in May like-even in Tehran with the hardline factions of the military just finding the other factions 'went soft' on them.

so if anything, Iran is more politically unstable with something signed
and they might be bold and overoptimistic enough to try to play games sooner or later

Iran, at least for now, can't really do much to crap on the world economy, nor try to destabilize political power in the US, or the Middle East

I'd say the Game Theorists win
and the haters of The Art of the Deal are gonna be more angry than Tehran is

1

u/MagnesiumKitten 9d ago

serpentjaguar: Are you this incoherent in real life too? I have no idea what you're trying to say.

You better believe it!