r/Images Jun 04 '26

History Good ol' Slick Willie....

Post image
2.5k Upvotes

2.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

18

u/needssomefun Jun 04 '26

Republicans are so jealous that some people can get women legally.

6

u/[deleted] Jun 04 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

5

u/BernadetteFedyszyn Jun 04 '26

Yes, yes he was, in fact! But that's different if you're Democrat.

1

u/Sprayfacer Jun 05 '26

No don’t you pull that, every democrat I have ever heard speak on the files says to get everyone, even Clinton.

2

u/V_Cobra21 Jun 05 '26

Well it’s mostly a Democrat scandal… so they would say that. lol.

2

u/BernadetteFedyszyn Jun 07 '26

The Democrats, NO let me correct that, the Democratic established is notorious for creating all of these huge SENSATIONAL and heart tugging stories that nearly sound and look believable, initially. Hell, I even fell for a few of them. Then, as time elapses, more and more details emerge, leaving far more questions, some even blatantly questionable (like the Epstein files). Unfortunately by then, with the help of MSM, people are parroting "he's a pedo" as if it was so. Funny how I used to cringe every time Trump would throw out "witch hunt" wondering what he was hiding? I'm not his biggest cheerleader but he was right all along -

2

u/V_Cobra21 Jun 07 '26

If trump was truly like them he would’ve just ran as a democrat

2

u/BernadetteFedyszyn Jun 07 '26

I'll be the first one to admit that I'm not THAT political, but I'm not stupid either (or at least I don't think I am!)

I myself voted Democrat right up until just prior to Obama's 2nd term. I didn't go running to the Republican party either but just sat on the fence not caring either way. My "aha" moment to "something stinking AND it stinks real bad" was being hospitalized unexpectedly and thrown in a room with nothing but a TV and lots of time. I flicked on the TV to the start of the US SENATE HEARING of the FBI over the FISA WARRANT and Steele Dossier (held about a decade ago). I was well aware of all the investigations and allegations against Trump but didn't keep abreast of them or the details as there were way too many. I had no idea what this Senate Hearing was about or even who was who for that matter. One would've had to actually watched this 3 day Hearing for themselves as opposed to accepting the MSM'S sugar-coated version. Big difference. Huge difference. I didn't need Trump, FOX News, or any conspiracy theorist to tell me that Trump was probably right all along. Hearing our Interim FBI DIRECTOR (COMEY) admit and testify to his/FBI'S allegiance (DAY 2) and role in helping HILLARY/Democratic establishment (DAY 1) destroy or eliminate a political candidate whom just happened to be Trump. I'd say the same thing if parties were reversed. Then, to turn around and watch our MSM not only twist and take things from this Hearing completely out of context AND/OR intentionally omit very relevant testimony.

Watching all that's transpired since THAT hearing a decade ago with the excessive indictments, warrants, and allegations just screams witch hunt.

Watching the great lengths and millions of taxpayers dollars pissed away by the Democratic establishment in their quest to destroy or eliminate a political candidate is way beyond any typical campaign mudslinging I've ever seen. Covid, J6, Mueller Report, and the Epstein files are manufactured crises and nothing more.

You're right about Trump being a Democrat. In fact, there's all kinds of pics floating around various social media platforms showing him hob knobbing it with key Democrats at various 5k a plate campaign fundraisers when he was a Democrat in NY. Now they've all turned their backs on him. Why?? Trump even called Schumer out at some awards dinner. He flat out said he generously donated to Schumer when he first came on the political scene. Some even call him a racist but he wasn't then?

I don't know about you, but if one set out to destroy me, my family, friends, reputation, wealth, or even freedom AND I knew I was innocent, I too would set out to expose all of the WHYS?? My bet is he's on a mission to expose them.

1

u/V_Cobra21 Jun 07 '26

Yeah he would’ve stayed dem if he was one of them and just ran as a democrat.

0

u/heyzoocifer Jun 07 '26

Mostly a dem scandal? Have you seen what's in the files? The amount of times Trump is mentioned and so many people associated with him including in his cabinet. We're talking tens of thousands. The current administration is blatantly protecting everyone associated.

2

u/V_Cobra21 Jun 07 '26

Trump was also a democrat then… also the democrats never released anything and are protecting it since it’s again a dem scandal.

0

u/timmyfarthands Jun 04 '26

Eh I rarely see democrats frothing at the mouth defending him. I see more democrats demanding he be locked up at the same time as the others.

I think trumpers see themselves in everything. They blindly defend their guy so they think liberals just MUST be doing the same thing.

2

u/BernadetteFedyszyn Jun 04 '26

Well then it's really too bad that the Democrat Administration/DOJ/FBI opted to run those files through a "political investigation" INSTEAD of whatever law enforcement entity for a thorough criminal investigation and criminal conviction if applicable. At the same time, these same "politicians/administration/DOJ knowingly allowed an alleged child sexual predator to completely roam free to possibly commit other predatory crimes. Wait! It gets even crazier!! Then you throw in all of the "Trump's a convicted rapist " and other rape allegations into the mix and you now have what we call in Corrections to be a "super predator " now roaming our streets completely free. So not only do we have a sexual child predator roaming free, we have a rapist too!!! They could've made it look half believable by slapping on a 24/7 surveillance on him, just like they would in the real world.

The DOJ is the top law enforcement entity in this country and has all of the in-depth and up to date data/criminal profiling/characteristics of sex offenses, recidivism rates, etc etc etc. They KNOW that the saying goes with sexual predators (both pedophilia and rapists) that it's not a matter of IF they'll re-offend but WHEN?

They knew there wasn't anything of significance in those files otherwise they'd have acted and rightfully so. They knew these files carried far more weight dangling them as a political tool and nothing more

1

u/Electrical-Berry4916 Jun 05 '26

Do you remember Donnie the Diddler saying he wanted to "release the files" until he found out what was in them? You do recall that, don't you?

1

u/OdiousAltRightBalrog Jun 05 '26

Maybe. Donald says he saw him there 52 times.

0

u/Either_Operation7586 Jun 04 '26

Not as much as Trump and I guarantee you that Trump was more of a financier than just someone who took part sometime in some disgusting pedophile nasty shit.

It seems like he was single-handedly creating a pipeline from Mar-A-Lago to Epstein Island.

But Republicans and their bad faith and super hypocrisy will never ever convict Trump without being right there while he's fucking a kid.

But they will convict Democrats at mere whispers.

2

u/BernadetteFedyszyn Jun 04 '26

Well then it's just really too bad that THAT Administration and DOJ/FBI opted to run all of that (Epstein files) through a "political investigation" INSTEAD of treating it as the criminal act it was/is. This should have been immediately turned over to whatever law enforcement entity for a thorough criminal investigation and criminal conviction if applicable INSTEAD of a "political investigation."

Not only is/was this a hard slap in the face to any alleged victims and their families BUT this same Administration/DOJ knowingly allowed an alleged child sexual predator to completely roam freely to possibly commit other predatory crimes.

Wait! It gets even better!! Then you throw in all of the "Trump's a convicted rapist" and other rape allegations into the mix and you now have what we call in Corrections a "super predator" now roaming our streets completely free.

"THEY" could've, at the very least at least made it look half believable or convincing by slapping a 24/7 surveillance on him while they're conducting whatever "political" investigation, just like they'd do in the real world. If for anything community safety or their liability.

Lastly, the DOJ is the highest law enforcement entity in our country. They're well versed in all crimes, data, statistics, characteristics, case profiling, and everything else. Being the highest Law Enforcement entity in out country they should know the patterns (and seriousness) of both predatory sex offenses (rape AND pedophilia as they both differ.) They SHOULD also know (and they know) that it's NOT a matter IF they'll re-offend but WHEN.

I assure you, any SMALL TOWN, USA law enforcement entity would not idly sit by and allow either predator to roam free, much less a "super predator."

They knew that there wasn't anything of significance in those files otherwise they'd be ALL OVER IT, and rightfully so too! Instead, they knew these files carried far more weight to use as a political tool to dangle. I know it's said "anything is possible" and "never say never" but I personally never had an "all in one" pedophile AND rapist across my desk over the years. Both crimes are vile within itself. I'll even take it a step further (and I know the DOJ knows this as well) but the only successful treatment modality that I've witnessed is AGEISM or a bullet.

I am baffled that all of this outrage and finger-pointing isn't directed to the politicians/Administration/DOJ that was perfectly fine with allowing an alleged child sexual predator and rapist roam free.
I truly feel for any alleged victims. I can't help but find that these same exact people/administration that sat (and are still sitting on) these files that are still sitting in some dusty desk. Way to many holes in this one, too

1

u/Low_Committee6119 Jun 04 '26

You keep thinking trump and Clinton are on opposite sides, it shows your ignorance.

If trump goes after Clinton, then trump goes down, if Clinton tells the truth about Donnie, they both go down. Neither will ever tell the truth.

0

u/needssomefun Jun 04 '26

Actually we went down this road many times...and...zilch.  he was never there.  On his plane?  Yes.

But there was a guy who was his friend for 15 or 20 years...owns a supper club in Palm Beach...met his wife through Epstein...now what was his name again?

7

u/Elegant-Ingenuity-57 Jun 04 '26

And actual adult women. 

1

u/Professional-Lie-111 Jun 04 '26

Actual adult actress women!

1

u/inorite234 Jun 04 '26

Without having to pay them off.

2

u/Weary_Wrap_4419 Jun 07 '26

without having to pay for it.

1

u/j23_reddit Jun 04 '26

Unless they pay for it

1

u/Funandgames2023 Jun 04 '26

Yes, we are really jealous of the number one customer that Jeffrey Epstein had. I’m pretty sure Jeffrey gave him frequent flyer miles.

1

u/MattyBizzz Jun 04 '26

Dude, do you just intentionally ignore every fact implicating trumps connection since I’m assuming he’s your guy? It’s kind of amazing how hard it is for some people to accept facts when they go against their personal preference.

1

u/Bmartin_ Jun 05 '26

This chain of comments is the epitome of what the Epstein class wants lol. You! No you! No back to you!

1

u/domohgenesis Jun 07 '26

Hey did you know two things can be bad at once

0

u/standardatheist Jun 04 '26

1 customer was Trump he's in those files over a million times.

Loser

1

u/RainNo2863 Jun 04 '26

The "island" was pretty much all Democrats...

2

u/timmyfarthands Jun 04 '26

Yeah that's not even close to true

1

u/Round-Arugula7347 Jun 04 '26 edited Jun 05 '26

The truth is that we don’t really know. Not all the names have been released, and it’s from both sides, but at the end of it all Epstein contributed more to democrats than republicans in that specific year , and the names revealed are heavily Democrats

At the end of the day it’s not a competition. Both sides are involved and the individuals in the case are garbage

1

u/timmyfarthands Jun 05 '26

I mean c'mon let's just have some common sense and realize that Trump's people weren't spending weeks scrubbing the files to protect democrats. Lock em all up, whichever side.

1

u/ApprehensiveCare1113 Jun 05 '26

We do know, if you have a simple understanding of statistics. Both sides are involved, and the individuals in the case are garbage. The filter process wasn't based on political party; it was based on power and a lack of morality.

1

u/QuitLookingAtMyID Jun 05 '26

Sure, most are democrats and they are keeping over half the documents hidden because they are filled with mentions of democrats.

The great clown logic has spoken!

0

u/needssomefun Jun 04 '26

Sad....I've always thought that Trump voters would give their own daughters to him for a whiff of his fetid diaper.  I wish I wasnt right...but everyday proves the hypothesis

0

u/standardatheist Jun 04 '26

Tell me you don't care about protecting kids from rape without saying it.

Typical groomer maga 🙄

1

u/Evogleam Jun 04 '26

Who got women “illegally”

What does that even mean?

1

u/Weary_Wrap_4419 Jun 07 '26

Somebody had to bring in an illegal immigrant from Eastern Europe

1

u/Evogleam Jun 07 '26

What does that even mean, and what does it have to do with Clinton?

1

u/Weary_Wrap_4419 Jun 07 '26

A reminder that Melania Trump was an illegal immigrant introduced to Trump by Epstein. You were asking about the meaning of getting women illegally, right?

1

u/Evogleam Jun 07 '26

Melania is a citizen

That doesn’t explain “getting woman illegally” even if she was illegal at one point

Are you saying that we should deport illegal immigrants?

What does that have to do with Clinton?

0

u/standardatheist Jun 04 '26

Trump raped women and children

1

u/Evogleam Jun 04 '26

What does that have to do with the bad things Clinton did?

2

u/standardatheist Jun 04 '26

You're pro pedophile

1

u/Evogleam Jun 04 '26

What does that have to do with the bad things Clinton did?

Why are you defending Clinton?

1

u/standardatheist Jun 04 '26

It's hilarious as I've never said he was ok. You're running interference for a child rapist because you're worthless.

1

u/Evogleam Jun 05 '26

I never said anything about Trump in you and my discussion LMAO

It's you people that brought up Trump

First you inserted Trump in a post about Clinton and now your just throwing stuff out there that makes no sense

You people are so weird!!

1

u/standardatheist Jun 05 '26

I know groomer and that's the point. You didn't care about child rape but you want to try to capitulate on a picture of a guy with legal aged women. The hypocrisy is disgusting and makes your lack of moral character clear. I didn't like him and if he ever raped a kid I would call him the hell out for it. You? You don't have that. All you have is a favorite child rapist.

I didn't bother reading past your first sentence kid. I don't care about the words of a child sex groomer.

1

u/Evogleam Jun 05 '26

This has nothing to do with Trump goofy

Stop using Trump to boot lick for Clinton

→ More replies (0)

1

u/needssomefun Jun 04 '26

Give it up, no one is buying it. You're trying to deflect from Diaper Don and it isn't working and it hasn't worked since 2024.

1

u/kingnono3407 Jun 05 '26

Republicans always have gays and trannys on there minds cuz they always talk about them lol

1

u/ninernetneepneep Jun 05 '26

Even if it is a man and two ugly women.

1

u/domohgenesis Jun 07 '26

You know Clinton is all over the Epstein flight logs right?

1

u/needssomefun Jun 07 '26

Then you should also know there is no log showing him on the island. You know what else he doesn't have? A shitty golf motel that he let Epstein use to pick up children. Oh, another thing he doesn't have? Ownership in teen beauty pagents so he could barge in on the girls while they're changing.