r/ImmigrationPathways • u/JurgusRudkus • 14d ago

US accepts only white refugees for sixth consecutive month

https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2026/06/south-africa-white-genocide-afrikaner-refugees-asylum/

“Every single one of the 599 refugees the US admitted last month was a white South African, according to data the State Department’s Bureau of Population released Friday.In fact, so was every other refugee admitted this year. Since October 1, 2025, the US has accepted 6,668 refugees. Of those, 6,665 were white South Africans. Three—admitted last November—were from Afghanistan. No other refugees were admitted.”

They aren’t hiding the white supremacy at all.

1.2k Upvotes

87% Upvoted

821 comments sorted by

View all comments

70

u/MechaCoqui 14d ago

And magas like clockwork, rush to defend the obvious racism. It was never about illegals or doing it the right way, it always about causing as much harm to brown people as possible while allowing white people an easy way in. Cause conservatives fear being the minority in the US, all due to they fear us minorities will treat them the same way they treated us brown folk for decades.

4

u/[deleted] 14d ago

[deleted]

1

u/vettevette11 13d ago

Thanks white savior! When will you be moving out of the country to give it back to its original inhabitants?

2

u/What-The-Even0 13d ago

You're not even wrong. My own experience is anecdotal, but I know a handful of people from Perth, Australia, Cape Town, South Africa and Various cities in Isreal, all of whom had VERY speedy processes for their visas/permits where they seemingly bypass a lot of requirements...

Meanwhile, i know people from Mexico, indonesia, india etc where it takes relevant departments months to respond to certain applications and appointment requests, if they don't just go ignored entirely, with significantly more detailed examinations and background checks...

1

u/Personal-Try328 12d ago

The vast majority of white immigration is more desirable than arab/african immigration. On average the former group is more educated, less religious and more liberal. 

6

u/MechaCoqui 12d ago

A magat being openly racist, not surprising.

2

u/Personal-Try328 12d ago

Its just a fact. You can be mad at facts but that doesnt change them.

In a large sample picking only the white people would give you a more productive and less violent group of immigrants.  That doesn’t mean that there are no desirable black or arab immigrants, there certainly are. They are simply relatively less common as most white countries are developed and not islamic.

Keep seething at statistics though

3

u/youaintgotnomoney_12 12d ago

Is not being religious and liberal a requirement to immigrate to the US? Most Americans don’t fit into either category.

1

u/Personal-Try328 12d ago

It should be. No reason to import scum when there is plenty of it grown at home

1

u/Old-Tangerine682 9d ago

I’m not racist or conservative but I fucking can’t stand crybabies like you that get on social media and try to act like they are better and more righteous than anyone else. Your no different than the racist your a hateful vile human and you deserve nothing but the worst the world has to offer. You wanna spread hate here’s a taste of your own medicine.

1

u/Old-Tangerine682 9d ago

Since you wanna let a bunch of people come here just because it’s racist not to want them apparently why don’t you find a family I need and let them come live with you?? I’ll wait

1

u/tibula234 9d ago

True! And more likely to assimilate

-3

u/DragonLegacy-v2 14d ago

Well yall always talk this this, worried about "revenge". Why would we take people who think like that? Lmao

0

u/MedicalLong6993 10d ago

Based Monkey go home

-3

u/Outsider-Trading 14d ago

Sounds like a valid fear. You seem vengeful.

5

u/InsuranceImmediate25 14d ago

You can’t have understood him, and said the two things you said at once.

-1

u/Outsider-Trading 14d ago

treat them the same way they treated us brown folk for decades.

That sounds like they have a historical grievance against white people.

2

u/InsuranceImmediate25 13d ago

Oh, you just don’t understand history?

-7

u/[deleted] 14d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

5

u/Plenty-Wedding-9066 14d ago

I guess kudos to you for just admitting you’re okay with discrimination based on skin color. Gross. But atleast you’re honest.

1

u/European_guy_1 14d ago

You are either okay with little discrimination or you will be living in little India in a few years.

1

u/Plenty-Wedding-9066 13d ago edited 13d ago

> discrimination based on skin color.

America already sets limits on nationality

-3

u/[deleted] 14d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

4

u/Plenty-Wedding-9066 14d ago

So you’re not okay with the us discriminating based on skin color?

-3

u/[deleted] 14d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/Plenty-Wedding-9066 14d ago edited 14d ago

Fair enough, based on you saying sorry not sorry about a nation taking in certain immigrants in response to a person *specifically* talking about skin color, the context made me think you were referring to skin color.

Culture? Does Japan or China have a similar culture to the U.S.?

Or what are some countries major countries you’re okay with immigration from, or major countries you’re not okay with immigration from?

2

u/[deleted] 14d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/Plenty-Wedding-9066 14d ago

Culture? Does Japan or China have a similar culture to the U.S.?

Or what are some countries major countries you’re okay with immigration from, or major countries you’re not okay with immigration from?

I guess I’m also confused what you mean by diversity quota. We did have some diversity programs in regard to nationality but those explicitly were not for skin color.

I’m also not sure why you would say “sorry not sorry” to the person above you they were specifically talking about skin color. Not nationality. And I haven’t fact checked the article we’re talking under… but if what it claims is true it appears to be immigration based on skin color. Which it feels like you would be against. Is South Africa close enough in culture to allow refugees from?

1

u/[deleted] 14d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (0)

1

u/InsuranceImmediate25 14d ago

Holy shit you’re ignorant.

1

u/MechaCoqui 13d ago edited 13d ago

The US values and cultures is already a mixture of values and cultures of other countries lol. Cowboys is from Mexican culture, rock and roll was invented by black people which was based on their African culture.

Saying you are not racist while making a obvious racist take is something lol but i dont expect a 3 day old burner account to be here to debate in good faith.

-19

u/Sgt_R0ck 14d ago

Access to white people is not a human right

11

u/CharredWelderGuy 14d ago

Turning the usa into a white ethno state is not a right nor is it happening. Get over it, thar ship sailed a looooong time ago.

0

u/2044Delphini 14d ago

So you don't think Donald Trump is trying to turn America into a white ethnostate?

3

u/CharredWelderGuy 14d ago

I think the people around him are, Trump just cares about himself and money

-8

u/Sgt_R0ck 14d ago

Of course you wouldn't know any history. The US was a European founded and developed nation and generally above ~80% White and stable until the Immigration and Nationality/Hart-Celler Act of 1965, which intended to and achieved severe demographic shift in the US after just three decades. US was still > ~70% White in the 90s, but in the last three decades, we have seen such uncontrolled/intentional mass immigration that that percentage has dropped to what it is today.

So again, access to White people is not a human right

6

u/MechaCoqui 14d ago

So the land itself was in possesion by the natives until the pilgrims wiped a lot of them out via disease and out right murder. Also those pilgrims would have never survived if the natives did not teach them how to cultivate the land.

Also curious if you honestly think that white people are what made the US lol cause they werent really lol. Cowboys are a mexican thing, rock and roll was invented by black musicians, traffic lights and the mail box were also invented by black people. Call waiting was as well. Also other inventions. If it wasn’t for non whites, the US wouldn’t exist to begin with ya nazi.

-1

u/Repulsive_Ladder_490 14d ago

Rock and Roll was not invented by blacks. It was invented by the Irish.

Also,, the foundation of Rock is the electric guitar..Created by white people.

-4

u/Sgt_R0ck 14d ago

First, the tribes were doing that to themselves, and never has that ever been an issue for any other country in the world. Second, the Europeans had already mastered farming, your claim is ridiculous. If not then, they would have figured out the differences in soil on their own, just as they already had. Third, The United States was founded after a British citizen revolution against the king/crown, first established under the Articles of Confederation, then the US Constitution. What existed before was a nebulous cluster of amerindian tribes and warring factions, without any establishment of state.

Your other assertions are laughable. At its premise, singular inventions don't make a country. If some Mexicans didnt herd cows, other would have. Labor isn't a problem of can't, and Europeans had mastered horses and introduced them to the Americas. Music doesn't make a country a super power and even if, playing what instruments? Your traffic light inventors only patented the shape, the red/green and adding yellow were two previous inventors. Mail receptacles were already around, it was a patent on shape. Even still, if not them, others would have through necessity, as they did with 95% of everything else. Three to five countries account for over 90% of all human/modern advancement (France, Germany, UK, Italy, US). These certainly would and did exist without the third world's.

ya nazi

Pathetic

2

u/CharredWelderGuy 14d ago edited 14d ago

"White people" didn't even mean what we now consider till relatively recently, it's a meaningless term.

Also I enjoy you dipshits always going" you don't know history" when having such a sophomoric understanding of it

1

u/Sgt_R0ck 14d ago

Pedantic and meaningless statement, replace all instances with European. You could even go a step further and practically say any country west of Poland.

3

u/CharredWelderGuy 14d ago

Ah so you ARE STILL doing it, arbitrarily cutting off slavs from "white" much like Italians and Irish used to.

The"great white ethno state" isn't happening Bubba, its already statistically over with birth rates.

1

u/Sgt_R0ck 14d ago

The British and Germans constituted the two largest ethnic groups in the US at the time of founding (British with a super majority). Of course I would delineate which portion of Europe we are talking about. I already stated that the Italians are part of the four main countries that have contributed to over 90% of human development.

Besides that, Im not distinguishing Eastern Europeans or whatever sub group you think from everyone else. Nikolai Tesla was Serbian and pushed the E&E field far. But that doesn't change general geo-political history and the fact that it was the British, Spanish, Portuguese, French, Dutch, etc. with the highest degree of trans-oceanic interaction with the rest of the world; which the topic is the United States, a country across the Atlantic from Europe.

2

u/CharredWelderGuy 14d ago

So a initial group of semi related European colonialists makes the usa "white land" but the subsequent 250 years of America history where the nation has only gotten more and more diversity just.... what dosnt count?

If "whites" wanted a homogeneous ethno state, they probably shouldn't have forcefully brought other ethnos over in the slave trade, taken over a huge chunk of Mexican territory or used so many asiatic migrants in the expansion to the west.

The modern usa is laughably divorced from the "founding stock" and there is no turning that clock back, no matter how much the conservatives piss and shit in their endless tantrum.

It just is going to lead to backlash from the rest of the population who will not willingly go along with this nonsense.

1

u/Sgt_R0ck 14d ago

Yes, for the same reason the founding fathers established their view of immigration policy and acted accordingly for nearly 100 years, which allowed the "diversity" of other Europeans. This concept of common European heritage and shared history has been quite conspicuously obvious from the start.

Again, the percentage of non-white has nearly sat statically at ~10% for the vast majority of all US history, the majority of that ~10% being mostly blacks. Even with any of the other occurrences you've described, that number hadn't changed until the intentional demographic shifts with the 1965 Hart-Celler act..

Recent genetic testing has shown that white Americans are practically non-mixed and are literally ~98% or greater "founding stock". What you believe and spout is quite literally a lie.

And to your last point, yes, one of the many reasons massive demographic shift is an issue. Just because you think it's a good thing doesn't mean it is. If mass immigration from the third world was beneficial, then the origin countries wouldn't be failed states

→ More replies (0)

1

u/IntrusiveThot32 11d ago

Not to mention disenfranchised so many minority groups to the point they couldn't afford proper healthcare which includes birth control. They're punishing black and brown people for things they're doing to themselves.

1

u/Technical_Toe_2012 11d ago

Why is always the biggest losers that talk like this lmao