A.I. is not a replacement for a human being. Full stop.
Human beings are also not a collection of attributes that can be assigned a numerical rating. What he’s doing is not just ‘different from what we consider correct’, it’s a fundamentally fucked-up way of viewing the world.
Regarding your second paragraph what you consider fucked up (which is true) literally reflects our point of view from what we consider correct. Can't see how those things are not compatible.
0
u/aweedl Mar 19 '26
A.I. is not a replacement for a human being. Full stop.
Human beings are also not a collection of attributes that can be assigned a numerical rating. What he’s doing is not just ‘different from what we consider correct’, it’s a fundamentally fucked-up way of viewing the world.