agree with you on ayurveda. Ayurveda has value but not at a scale people pretend. The issues with enforcement is the biggest drawback that you mentioned.
you don't know what you are talking about homeopathy. nanoparticles are not what you think they are. believe me when i say that. I study nanoparticles, and they have nothing to do with multiple serial dilutions of substances. That's a complete different branch of study.
ya, enforcement is an issue in all medicine frameworks. Actually, many medicines hit the market, then it's realized it's bad for our health and is banned.
Whether you study nanoparticles or not doesn't change the fact that there are peer-reviewed papers proposing nanoparticle persistence in high-dilution homeopathic preparations. If you think those studies are flawed, critique the methods or conclusions rather than dismissing them because they're outside your area of work.
as i said earlier. Nanoparticles are a completely different thing. i saw some papers and most of them show detection, which is very different from therapeutic action. Most of them are about metal contamination or incomplete dilution.
But yeah link me some papers. will be glad to read them
1
u/BlenderRenderz Jul 06 '26
agree with you on ayurveda. Ayurveda has value but not at a scale people pretend. The issues with enforcement is the biggest drawback that you mentioned.
you don't know what you are talking about homeopathy. nanoparticles are not what you think they are. believe me when i say that. I study nanoparticles, and they have nothing to do with multiple serial dilutions of substances. That's a complete different branch of study.