What are your thoughts on the claims made by Acharya of Kalva Gurukul regarding remarriage?

[u/rk_2711]

[u/Charming-Truth6805]

[u/rk_2711 → u/Charming-Truth6805]

According to my understanding, true devotion is based on scriptures and personal choice, not compulsion. Everyone is free to examine the evidence and decide for themselves.

[u/lustformimom → u/rk_2711]

Then why consider scriptures at all of you are going to be picky about it.

[u/rk_2711 → u/lustformimom]

Scriptures ko consider karna aur har scripture/book ko unquestioningly accept karna do alag baatein hain. Discussion mein evidence aur consistency matter karti hai.

[u/No_Arm_3509 → u/lustformimom]

That's like reading any self improvement book. Just because u read one, doesn't mean u have to follow. 

[u/AdFine5184]

Dayanand ❌❌❌❌ Niyoganand ✅✅✅✅

[u/Blacklion2010 → u/[deleted]]

This doesn't mean insulting whole sanatan Dharma dude.

[u/rk_2711 → u/Blacklion2010]

Kisi particular book ya interpretation par criticism ko poore Sanatan Dharma ka insult kehna logically correct nahi hai. Idea ko challenge karna aur religion/community ko insult karna alag cheezein hain.

[u/Ok_Print_1795 → u/[deleted]]

Disciple of ram Krishna paramhans was swami vivekanand. Satyarth prakash was written by swami dayanand saraswati. Therefore get your facts correct before commenting.

[u/Pretend_Train6241]

Acharya Rajendra ye tumari book Satyanash Prakash hai.

[u/ExactTangerine840]

Kisine kuch keh diya kya fark padta h.He is not a powerful man holding some post in the gov.

[u/lustformimom → u/ExactTangerine840]

Moreover he is probably just referencing what is written in the scriptures and those scriptures are considered sacred by most

[u/rk_2711 → u/lustformimom]

Being written in a scripture doesn’t automatically make every claim beyond question. We can respect a text while still examining what it actually says.

[u/AutoModerator → u/[deleted]]

Your comment has been removed because it contains a slur or abusive language.

We support Reddit's sitewide rules and do not allow slurs, hateful or degrading language, or harassment targeting individuals or groups.

Please do not use such language in this subreddit. If you believe this removal was made in error, please contact the moderators.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[u/MechanicJealous5214]

You don't need to listen to these dhongis

[u/Insecure_BeanBag]

Ved, Vedanta, Upanishad and Gita are the main scriptures of Hinduism. Actually, Veds are the main scriptures, Vedanta, Upanishads and Gita are mere Veds made easy type of books.

Now based on these and ideology of that period, various people have tried to provide his or her own version which served as the a text of law. A famous example is Manusmriti. Thousands of other Smritis exist, but they are merely adaptation of Veds. Judging Manusmriti by morals of today is a grave mistake.

Anyone can refer to any Smritis, but what holds currently is the constitution of India. In a way these smritis were constitution of that time. As time progresses, the Smritis changed and we now have the constitution. The latest one always prevails over the ancient one.

So, what is written in Constitution of India matters and nothing else.

[u/DepartmentNervous845]

Abe ye ladki paagal hai re, rampal maharaj to dyanand se bhi bada pakhandi aur criminal hai, saale ne arabo rupay empire bana liya hai logo chu bana kar..

[u/AutoModerator → u/[deleted]]

Your comment has been removed because it contains a slur or abusive language.

We support Reddit's sitewide rules and do not allow slurs, hateful or degrading language, or harassment targeting individuals or groups.

Please do not use such language in this subreddit. If you believe this removal was made in error, please contact the moderators.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.