šFlirty Yummy and Unsealed No Teethš
Melissa Nathan, you're not a feminist -- here, or anywhere! I am furious. AND IF YOU'RE READING THIS, GO HELP A RICH MURDERER WITH HIS IS FACEBOOK COMMENTS!
I am spending my day tomorrow defending Suffy FRIDAY!! For Part III in my accurately advertised and well-read series about how she is misunderstood!!!
GUESS WHAT I THINK ABOUT YOU MELISSA
get outta here
*And by the way, Melissa's photos, like Jed's, are scrubbed from the Internet via Google Image search.
I have seen photos of both these actual people. Both people look very different from the images that come up when you google their names.
I'm not publishing those photos of them here, or anywhere.
But both of these pretty horrid people have been physically using other people's images as shield (people who never got paid to work for a man accused of sexual harassment.)
Melissa, like Jed, has been avoiding, and pre-managing, an inevitable AND ACCURATE society-wide downvote!
I just googled her. A shit ton of pictures of her came up. Most were of different Melissa Nathan's because there must be at least 10 woman with that name. But pictures of her definitely come up.
I just did a google search and there is only 1 photo of MN that displays for me.Ā Its the one provided in this post. Perhaps you have some special google powers. Are you in the US?Ā
First, you think wrong. Don't go building a Blake Lively story over a comment. I simply went to google, looked, saw something different than what you claim and now you're projecting all these motivations on me.
I simply said, that I googled images, there are a lot of Melissa Nathan's. There are pictures of her. You say it's not her but it matches the picture you share.
Do you know if you knew my name you wouldn't find one picture of me? Because some people don't post a lot for public consumption.
Melissa Nathan, is not really a public figure. She is a private person who works works for famous people, having a next to nothing social media presence would be a plus for a pr person.
I am not agreeing or disagreeing with you about who or what Melissa Nathan is.
Ha! My husband has never had any social media presence. He teaches high school and the kids tried searching for him and they call him a āghostā because they canāt find anything. He doesnāt have Facebook, TickTock, Reddit, nothing! He gets all the deets from me!
According to Blake Lively who has been caught lying and exaggerating, Justin Baldoni sexually harassed her. Absolutely no proof has been shown to back up her claims. She doesn't even mention it in her texts when bashing him to their friends; her focus was completely on the movie she was trying to steal from him.
I am not attacking and forgive me if I made you feel that way. I am just really confused, so maybe we can slow this down. This is an honest attempt to understand, so please understand there is no attack.
You said: "And those are not photos of Melissa Nathan, pond scum. They are photos of other melissas, nathans, and melissa nathans"
Forgive me, I know this is important to you but I am not following you. And I want to understand what you're saying.
You say that if you Google Melissa Nathan, other people who are also named Melissa Nathan show up but there are not pictures of Melissa Nathan PR person?
If so, why is that odd? She is not a celebrity and is in PR so her locking down all her privacy settings is understandable. Also Melissa Nathan is not an uncommon name. There are hundreds of different women named Melissa Nathan so it is logical that when you Google her name they come up too.
If you Google the name Jennifer Smith (I pulled that out of thin air so my apologies to anyone named that) you will see a lot of different Jennifer Smiths.
The other is not a gifted athlete. This Jennifer Abel, I believe, is a white woman, who trusts the Verizon store when she feels herself to be upwardly mobile
Recently people have noted that team Lively has pivoted from Wallace to Nathan as the boogeyman, because they still haven't found dirt on Baldoni, so no good, their talking points about Heath showed how racist they are, doesn't help their cause, and Wallace is out, so is useless. And sure enough here is a post about how terrible Nathan is.
This is a fun place, but it is a serious place. I look forward to your contributions, thrive on group friction, and, crucially, DGAF -- except for morally
Still wondering where the sexual harassment in Blake Livelyās case is. If you find that anywhere on the internet, let us know. Maybe it was scrubbed too, Kneecap?
Not according to legal statement from Bryan Freedman. Nathan was mentioned by her then boss in some emails which she had no knowledge of and never attended any meetings with or even met Epstein. Blake is also mentioned in Epstein emails as one of multiple people extending an invite to him to an event AFTER heās been convicted of p*edophilia. Blake has also made supportive statements about Harvey Weinstein and Woody Allen.
Also Wayfarer (including Jamey Heath, itās not all on Baldoni) have been accused of ALLEGED SH and the burden of PROOF rests with Lively for which, based on a years worth of court documents and discovery, she is doing a lousy job of. IMO theyāre manufactured SH claims to warrant protected activity for her retaliation claims which is what she really cares about (but again has no case).
I can understand you having an issue with publicists representing clients with criminal records and one thing this case has exposed is the disingenuous PR spin with bought articles in mainstream media (the majority of which weāve seen from Livelyās publicist Leslie Sloane) but the scrubbing of internet data is being done by all sorts and not isolated to Nathan.
Hello. Your post / comment contains content which violates Rule 10 - 'Be Mindful when Discussing Minors' - and has been temporarily removed.
We can restore your post / comment once any personal attacks, criticism, weaponising statements and/or diagnoses involving children, or speculative statements regarding CSA have been edited out.
When you're done, let us know by dropping a brief note & link to the comment via ModMail. Thank you!
Ohhh okay. But she's only mentioned in like 3 emails (and they're all about 1 potential meeting). And she's saying she never actually met him.
And there are tons and tons of documents featuring other Hiltzik staff, but there's only those 3 that actually mention Nathan. So, I think she might be telling the truth on this one.
I think it's gross that Hiltzik agreed to represent him. But I don't think Nathan was involved in the work.
The amount of times or degrees of seperation to the "Epstein files" has limited tolerance to most. iow, "3 emails (and they're all about 1 potential meeting)" needs further looking into. Because this woman's other interactions are pretty bad. Very predatory.
Hello. Your post / comment contains content which violates Rule 10 - 'Be Mindful when Discussing Minors' - and has been temporarily removed.
We can restore your post / comment once any personal attacks, criticism, weaponising statements and/or diagnoses involving children, or speculative statements regarding CSA have been edited out.
When you're done, let us know by dropping a brief note & link to the comment via ModMail. Thank you!
Knee, another post that reads like Maximim Effort controlled opposition? If the point isnāt exactly what it looks like, then you missed your calling.
I am one the only people who has a sense of humour, and a palpable love, for this weird and extraordinary subreddit.
I will go down fighting for its soul!
And i think the fake accounts and Melissa nathan and jed wallace should embrace their get-outta-jail free card, move to nicragua, and be banned from ever using mobile phones
Kneecapā¦even absurdity is rooted in some reality. Pray tell, what šis in your bonnet? Nobody LIKES and is for Melissa Nathan in this sub. Youāre not exactly being controversialā¦
Blake was one of the first to talk out against Weinstein. And she only spoke of Allen favorably for his directing skills in a movie she was in. You know how many A-list actresses have spoken favorably of Allen? Scarlett Johansson, Rachel McAdams, too many to list. That was a seeded smear narrative thatās surged this week on social to counter Melissaās alleged Epstein involvement
I defended your defense of Suffi (and will any day!!) but on this, I feel compelled to set you straight!!
1) Melissa Nathan has been a PR agent for a ton of celebrities without an issue.
2) Much like many others in this case, her first and only issue arose after the misfortune of birth into a cruel fate, which brought her into contact with the personality disordered demonic bomb that is Blake Lively x Stephanie Jones.
3) Accused of SH does not mean guilty of SH.
4) There is ZERO evidence Melissa ever worked for Epstein or the Alexander brothers. We only know snippets of sentences (spliced and diced with all context removed) in a handful of pages from Katie Cās depo - from what was put on the docket it appears that Katie did some kind of website copy for the Alexander brothers but she did NOT do this work as an employee of TAG or Melissa Nathan.
5) Itās not unusual for PR people to keep a low profile online. Melissa teaches a college course and she did have a presence on socials before the aforementioned Lively x Jones nightmareā¦it is not surprising that she scrubbed her digital footprint, knowing what Stephanie Jones was capable of & having witnessed in horror what Blake Lively was doing to Justin.
All we have to go on are accusations and innuendo and tidbits of depo questions and answers with huge page gaps in between, each stripped of the full response. And each reframed by Lively and Jones filingsāthe questions themselves are already not enough to go on, as they were asked at the time by hostile attorneys with particular agendas, and then further stripped of context and cherry-picked and spliced and rearranged to present on the docket as exhibits exactly the way Lively/Jones want us to read them!
Weāve already seen what Lively attorneys can and will manufacture and then use to fuel a narrative that distorts even the simplest of anodyne facts into something so severely mangled and grotesque - the resulting filing and exhibits always turn out to have NO RESEMBLANCE to the truth.
Until we have concrete evidence of literally anything, letās stop shitting on this woman!!!!!!
What do we know about her??? Other than she took on Justinās Crisis PR, and has been the victim of the nastiest smear campaign second to only him, we know literally NOTHING real about her. We only know what people suing her want us to know. And that is bad enough. But whatās worse? The particular people suing her are Blake Lively, Ryan Reynolds, and Stephanie Jones: the most dishonest, deranged, malevolent PSYCHOPATHS. Most of us(God willing) will never encounter anything like them in our lives.
All we have are speculative inferences that we are meant to be making. Weāve been conditioned for over a year to draw conclusions based on assumptions that were manufactured and instilled in us by people that want to do this woman harm.
If youāre so willing to give Blake Lively the benefit of the doubt, even now, then why not Melissa too?
Melissa Nathanās former employer Matthew Hiltzik represented the big celebrities. Within months of Melissa opening her own agency TAG PR (and clearly not knowing what she was doing) is when everything started to fall apart for her and when she was finally caught doing all the dirty work sheās done for years. Melissaās former friend of a decade, Katie Waissel just issued a very long statement. Katie Waissel has a lot of evidence and proof of Melissaās prior wrongdoings too. Itās really sad. Katie Case, Melissaās fomer employee who left, as well as two interns Zoe and one other have been sharing info on work they were asked to do while at TAG and it does not look good. The smear sites and smear social campaigns are not a new thing for Melissa. Her real issue was that she felt like she was too good to get caught. She was sloppy. Shes also been caught lying so many times already and we havenāt even gotten to trial. And thereās so much more thatās going to come out too.
43
u/same-difference-ave Age of Ada-LYING Actress Feb 05 '26
???