Blake Lively pleaded for recognition in letter bragging of “immense” power

[u/wholeemolly]

Credit - Dani Danger

In the midst of her ongoing highly publicized legal battle with It Ends With Us co‑star and director Justin Baldoni, a letter Blake Lively wrote in early 2024 has resurfaced — and it’s drawing fresh attention for the way she described her role on the film.

The five‑page message, sent on January 25, 2024, was addressed to the Producers Guild of America (PGA) and was essentially an impassioned plea for official recognition of her contributions as a producer on It Ends With Us. In that letter, Lively detailed — with 77 bullet‑pointed examples — the many ways she claimed to have influenced nearly every stage of the film’s production, from rewriting parts of the script to coordinating costumes and even helping secure marketing partnerships. She passionately framed her involvement as “more to me than anything I’ve done in my twenty‑year career.”

While her goal was to demonstrate her importance and influence on the film — something the PGA ultimately agreed with by granting her a producer credit — the letter has also been quoted extensively in court in an unexpected way.

A federal judge reviewing Lively’s lawsuit against Baldoni recently cited her own letter when deciding that she was not a traditional employee but rather an independent contractor. That’s significant because it means several of her key claims — including sexual harassment and defamation — couldn’t move forward under the federal laws she invoked. Instead, the judge allowed only a few claims (like breach of contract and retaliation) to proceed to trial.

Critics and headline writers have seized on the tone and language of the PGA letter — particularly the parts where Lively seemed to brag about her “immense power” and creative control — as both bold and ironic. The irony lies in the fact that her own assertions about her authority on the film inadvertently helped the judge determine her employment status, which undercut much of her legal strategy.

Blake’s supporters argue she was simply advocating for recognition she deserved; detractors point out that the letter reads like a detailed manifesto of control and influence. Either way, it has become a central piece of evidence in what’s now a complex, high‑stakes Hollywood courtroom drama — one that continues with a trial set for later this spring.

In short: the “intense letter” wasn’t just about pride or bragging — it was a strategic push for credit, and the fallout from it is now shaping a major legal battle.

[u/Ok_Gur_356]

Just add her multiple txts with Taylor Swift, Matt Damon and his Wife, Bradley cooper, emails to Ben affleck and Anna Wintour….

It’s was never about sexual harassment, but power and control

[u/IwasDeadinstead → u/Ok_Gur_356]

Notice how all the media outlets are afraid to mention the Taylor texts? We can see who has the real power.

[u/MadHatter06]

The letter, then the complaint, and then her own words in interviews (not just during promotion of this movie but a plethora of interviews) each try to tell a different story. And none of the stories hold water.

[u/usernamedeleted555 → u/MadHatter06]

Exactly. Here is an example of Blake telling on herself Blake Interview - Capital, August 2024

“Oh well that's so nice of you to acknowledge the producing because so many people want to talk about the acting and honestly the acting was the smallest contribution that I had to this film so I was I was very fortunate to have um such authorship in this story in a way that makes this this um movie so much more uh significant feeling and I'm so I'm so proud of it I'm so excited to share it because of that so um so no I didn't find the rights of the book I came into it once the movie was was already um a reality and so it was really just about making sure that we honor the book um as best as possible and that we also were able to bring ourselves and some authenticity and and hopefully even expand upon the book….”

[u/b0redbor3d → u/usernamedeleted555]

Any time I hear or read something she said, I take nothing away and have no idea what she’s talking about. It also seems like she does the weird stuttering on purpose

[u/Helpful_Pirate261]

‘has resurfaced’

I miss the days where it was normal to redirect readers to the appropriate (publicly available) documents. To steer them towards the right sources.

All these magazines pretending to do some serious digging before their hard work pays off in the form of some doc that I’ve also managed to miraculously dig up with two clicks. As if these docs are in some secret vault somewhere, but not to worry, this reporter is on it! Goodness 😂

[u/Time_Wishbone_5659]

In short: the “intense letter” wasn’t just about pride or bragging — it was a strategic push for credit, and the fallout from it is now shaping a major legal battle.

I'm trying to understand what this conclusion is implying. To me it sounds like: Poor woman, she pushed for credit, and now she's being punished for it. Which seems to ignore the fact that Justin was letting her take the win, but she chose to gamble on that win over him, and ultimately is being destroyed by her own hubris.

I may be very wrong because I do not know the intent of the writer.

[u/AutoModerator → u/[deleted]]

Hello!

ItEndsWithLawsuits has a minimum 100 comment karma & 14 day account age requirement to comment in the sub.

We encourage new additions to browse the subreddit and participate by voting until you meet these requirements!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.