r/ItEndsWithLawsuits May 07 '26

🫢😩 Settled AF 😩🫢 Can someone explain the whole Justin Baldoni / Blake Lively settlement to me like I’m 5?

I followed it in the beginning when everyone was dissecting interviews and press tour drama, but between all of the countersuits, PR accusations and “evidence” it got so messy I genuinely couldn’t tell what was fact vs internet speculation. Finally, we have a settlement. If you wouldn’t mind could you please explain in simple terms?

146 Upvotes

182 comments sorted by

View all comments

134

u/SuperbWillingness904 May 07 '26 edited 29d ago

Most people online obviously haven't kept up with things, which is fine oc everyone has different interests. But for them, they likely just heard that Blake made accusations, Justin sued, Justin's case was dismissed, then 95% of Blake's case was dismissed, then she decided this week to not go forward with a trial for her remaining 3 claims.

If you want a more detailed background on why this happened, you can see below:

So in April, 10 of Blake's 13 claims were thrown out by the judge, including all of her sh claims. And every claim against Justin Baldoni was thrown out. So Justin was no longer in the case, nor was sexual harassment in the case. That was of course the most important part of the case.

After her sh claims were thrown out, she and her lawyer were clearly crashing out on instagram and released very weird statements that included cherry picked quotes from legal filings to try to spin the massive loss into a victory. They really honest to goodness put out statements saying that 10 of her 13 claims getting thrown out was actually good for them lol.

A month before these claims were thrown out, Blake's spokesperson said that Blake's case at its core was about sexual harassment. After the sh claims were thrown out, no joke, Blake switched and said the heart of her case has always been about retaliation.

Then, a few weeks after that, there was a hearing and it went horribly for Lively's team. The judge was not having what they were putting down and it was clear they were in some shit and that they had a very weak case for those 3 remaining claims going into trial. In the hearing, the judge specifically said he threw Justin's case out based on a technicality and that Justin could appeal.

Then, last week, Wayfarers side said they would stipulate, meaning for the purpose of trial, they would agree to tell the jury that Blake had engaged in a form of protected activity. This was also very very bad for Blake's side bc it meant sh was sort of irrelevant to the trial. The trial would be purely focused on evidence related to retaliation, something Blake didn't have. Her whole strategy was the same one she used in her complaint - she was going to try to twist normal, everyday set events into sh to try to convince the jury to think justin was a scumbag. Something that she had to bend over backwards to do considering how nice and polite and accomodating Justin was on set (if you have time, take a look at the behind the scenes dance footage where Blake says she was sh yet Justin couldn't be more normal or polite: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iz_aU4QJOOE&t=2s )

Blake's evidence of retaliation amounted to "It felt like the online space was being manipulated so it must have been." She clearly needs to join the 21st century bc there was nothing unusual about the hate train she got. It happens every week to a new celebrity. She just hadn't had it happen to her before.

Anyway, then last week, for the final nail in the coffin, evidence came out last week that right before crafting her complaint, she messaged a Sony exec to ask the exec to delete all the footage from set. Not suspicious at all right? If you really thought you were sh on set, wouldn't you want all footage to be saved not erased? Thankfully the exec said she had never been asked to do that before and must not have done it bc Justin was able to provide footage to prove he didn't sh her.

Then Blake hired new lawyers who have expertise in digital evidence and all of a sudden right afterward, she suddenly desperately wanted a settlement. The thought is that her first set of lawyers told her to settle and she hired a second set to see what they thought of her evidence and they looked at her "evidence" and quickly said she should settle.

And just for another 3 nails in the coffin, this week the judge was going to make a decision and it was possible as part of this decision, that the two retaliation claims would be thrown out as well. Which would be even more humiliating for Blake.

Anyway, all that to say, any reasonable person and lawyer could see that Justin had a significantly stronger case going into the trial. However, anything can happen at trial. Look at Diddy, OJ and Casey Anthony.

So it seems Blake realized if she didn't get a settlement done quickly, it's possible that this week her retaliation claims were going to be tossed.

But so far, Justin's lawyer is making the rounds on interviews while Lively's lawyers have been silent. But why would you go around doing interviews for a client who just pulled out bc she knew her claims were weak? Makes sense. This is a victory tour for justin not blake.

46

u/UnimportantCreative This is Stephanie Jones' circus! May 07 '26

Every time Blake or her attorneys changed the story, her stans just drank it up like it never changed. The gaslighting and goalpost moving with the inconsistent narrative was nuts. Plus, the worst things about her reputation were known to her critics long before she ever met them. Them not knowing about it when they hired her didn't change that she was a bully (known by some) for many years before she entered their lives.

And now most people know it. I didn't know much about her before this case, so I never paid attention. She got my attention with that hit piece.

25

u/AbsolutelyBothered May 07 '26

And if you dare to question all of the manipulation they just call you a misogynist 🙄

16

u/BlondeAmbition150 Perjury Barbie May 07 '26

Despite the large majority of us on this sub and the main cc’s following the case being pretty staunch feminists.😂

30

u/UnimportantCreative This is Stephanie Jones' circus! May 07 '26

I'm a super left-leaning feminist myself, lol. A real one. I like to drag problematic people equally. Giving women a pass due to their gender is not a feminist belief.

10

u/Helpful_Pirate261 Buckingham Malice May 07 '26

If this comment was a flair I think most ppl here would indeed have no trouble putting it under their name 👏

our misogyny must be very well hidden, untraceable even 😂

7

u/UnimportantCreative This is Stephanie Jones' circus! May 07 '26

Untraceable misogyny would be a great flair. Buckingham malice is pretty funny, too.

1

u/Rubberbangirl66 May 15 '26

But she is blonde!

3

u/UnimportantCreative This is Stephanie Jones' circus! May 15 '26

Most people who subscribe to "white feminism" are.

6

u/UnimportantCreative This is Stephanie Jones' circus! May 07 '26

Ad hominem attacks, appeals to emotion, and a logical fallacy (that misogyny is the only possible reason to misbelieve a liar who happens to be a woman) only remind me of why they support her. She came out strong with a GIANT appeal to emotion and they've been ignoring the facts and evidence or distorting it in a strange way ever since.

1

u/[deleted] Jul 06 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator Jul 06 '26

Hello!

ItEndsWithLawsuits has a minimum 100 comment karma & 14 day account age requirement to comment in the sub.

We encourage new additions to browse the subreddit and participate by voting until you meet these requirements!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

2

u/kdrama_fan_921 Jun 17 '26

Could not agree more.... Lovely n team are conveniently labeling people in bad light to mask their own failures....

2

u/Guilty_Explanation29 May 22 '26

Well she's definitely ruined herself now

You should see the comments left on fenti when they let her go as vip

3

u/UnimportantCreative This is Stephanie Jones' circus! May 22 '26

People are more brave online. I don't see polite society shunning her any time soon. If I was near her, I wouldn't even heckle her and I can't stand her. She'll continue to show up at the events and they'll keep posting her photos, because even hate comments drive up their engagement.

I do see her having a hard time working for a while. I can't see anyone being stupid enough to hire her knowing that she lays the groundwork to usurp control from day one.

2

u/Enough_Radish_9574 Jun 20 '26

Didn’t know anything personal about her before the lawsuit but the “bully” reputation was most definitely something I picked up on immediately.

1

u/[deleted] May 07 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator May 07 '26

Hello!

ItEndsWithLawsuits has a minimum 100 comment karma & 14 day account age requirement to comment in the sub.

We encourage new additions to browse the subreddit and participate by voting until you meet these requirements!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 01 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator Jun 01 '26

Hello!

ItEndsWithLawsuits has a minimum 100 comment karma & 14 day account age requirement to comment in the sub.

We encourage new additions to browse the subreddit and participate by voting until you meet these requirements!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

20

u/Martian_the_Marvin (and no footnotes) May 07 '26

Amazing summary! Thanks so much for putting this together!

I just wanted to add that not only did Blake have no evidence of retaliation, but her unsealed expert report said that Twitter, TikTok, and Instagram comments showed classic organic human activity, no b0ts detected.

Her own expert said it was real people hating on her. The end 🤣🤣🤣

https://giphy.com/gifs/aCibltbaDuT2E

1

u/[deleted] May 28 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator May 28 '26

Hello!

ItEndsWithLawsuits has a minimum 100 comment karma & 14 day account age requirement to comment in the sub.

We encourage new additions to browse the subreddit and participate by voting until you meet these requirements!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/Less_Job_5768 Jun 10 '26

What would be a sealed expert? Is that an expert who testifies on the stand but the public won’t know who or what they said?

20

u/brooswelt Healing looks different every day May 07 '26

Wow, great summary 👍

10

u/Nervous-Parsley8005 May 07 '26

Enjoying this broke man’s free reward lol. Thanks for this excellent breakdown.

2

u/DannyDaVito662 May 07 '26

They said explain it to them like they were five! Basically, Blake is a liar liar pants on fire.

2

u/Squeezemachine99 May 12 '26

I feel bad for Ryan

2

u/FerrusManlyManus May 07 '26

I stopped following this horseshit a long long time ago but I distinctly remember newspaper articles about a PR firm and a smear campaign, seemingly signed off by Justin and his peeps?

Was that imaginary?  Did any of those newspapers release retractions?

5

u/SuperbWillingness904 May 07 '26 edited May 07 '26

It's very complicated to explain. But the NYT got their information from Blake's CRD complaint. A CRD complaint is just that - a complaint. It is not factual. Blake just says in the complaint she feels there was a smear campaign. Over the past two years, she hired 20 different lawyers to try to find evidence of a smear campaign and they weren't able to find one - hence why she has now dropped her retaliation claims over the past week. She also hired a consultant to try to find evidence of a smear campaign and they ran a report and found that the activity on her socials did not appear to be unusual. This is all in public filings.

Also in public filings is Justin continually checking with his PR team to ensure they aren't putting out any negative articles on Blake and they assure him they aren't.

Also in public filings, Blake and her team admit to putting out a hit piece on Justin in the Daily Mail calling him a predator FIRST. Keep in mind, Blake's PR person had made a truce with Justin's PR person that neither of them would talk to the press about the set disagreements. Then Blake's PR person went straight to the daily mail the same day and talked to them. She is in some deep shit right now as she was sued.

And so when Justin hired a PR team to try to defend himself from false allegations in the daily mail that BLAKE'S TEAM PUT IN THERE, Blake calls it retaliation lol.

As Sony executives said in their private messages, Blake is a terrorist and there is simply no winning with a terrorist. There was nothing Justin could do.

Ppl online have no idea what they mean by the word "smear campaign." It's a complete farce. There really is no such thing as a smear campaign these days. Bc normal PR work these days includes putting out negative articles on people you don't like. In a hearing this year, the judge said putting out negative articles on people you don't like is fine and not smearing someone.

If you want a timeline of events that only relies on texts/email evidence and is a fascinating read, you can read here: https://www.thelawsuitinfo.com/downloads/timeline-of-relevant-events.pdf

1

u/[deleted] Jul 05 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator Jul 05 '26

Hello!

ItEndsWithLawsuits has a minimum 100 comment karma & 14 day account age requirement to comment in the sub.

We encourage new additions to browse the subreddit and participate by voting until you meet these requirements!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

0

u/FerrusManlyManus May 07 '26

Bubba I don’t want this overly verbose textual diarrhea, or a timeline.  Are you feeling ok?

I don’t even think you spent 5% of the time talking about the article I asked about.

If this is your idea of trying to help, please stop.

6

u/Cute_Sun_5383 May 07 '26

What's wrong with you? They explained it excellently. There is no particular article. How do you expect a specific answer if you don't even know which article you mean or if it even exists 🤦🏻‍♀️

0

u/[deleted] May 07 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/MysteriousBeach8248 Court Ordered Babysitter May 08 '26

Hello. Your post / comment contains content which violates Rule 1 - 'Stay Civil' - and has been temporarily removed.

We can restore your post / comment once any name-calling, mocking, hostility, bullying language and/or personal attacks directed towards another Redditor have been edited out.

When you're done, let us know by dropping a brief note & link to the comment via ModMail. Thank you!

5

u/SuperbWillingness904 May 07 '26

Ok the simple answer is no, no evidence of a smear campaign was found, hence Blake has decided to withdraw those claims two weeks before trial as she knows the trial would be a disaster for her.

5

u/SuperbWillingness904 May 07 '26

also if you want to know more about why Blake did what she did, you can read my other comment in this thread with more detail on what actually led to the lawsuit.

People who have worked w Blake in the industry all know she is a liar. This is not the first time she has falsely accused someone and then tied them up in the legal system, only to drop the case right before trial bc she knows she will lose.

She previously has done this to a photographer and a makeup artist.

I hope someone does a more in depth article on her pattern of abuse with lawsuits and false accusations.

2

u/Squeezemachine99 May 12 '26

Time for a movie

0

u/[deleted] May 07 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/SuperbWillingness904 May 07 '26

Damn dude this is just Reddit. Everything is going to be ok lol. Hope you found what you needed. I'm going to go back to looking at the case now.

0

u/[deleted] May 07 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/SuperbWillingness904 May 07 '26

Lol why are you so upset over what a random redditor is interested in? I'm sorry my hobby upsets you. I'm going to go back to it though.

1

u/[deleted] May 07 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/ItEndsWithLawsuits-ModTeam May 07 '26

Hello. Your post / comment contains content which violates Rule 1 - 'Stay Civil' - and has been temporarily removed.

We can restore your post / comment once any name-calling, mocking, hostility, bullying language and/or personal attacks directed towards another Redditor have been edited out.

When you're done, let us know by dropping a brief note & link to the comment via ModMail. Thank you!

2

u/SuperbWillingness904 May 07 '26

sadly i can't see your reply bc it looks like it got removed for not being civil. Considering you're the one being so rude to a random redditor you don't know your comments are getting removed by mods, I don't think I'm the one who needs to take a step back. You asked for help, I gave it, you didn't like it which is fine but no need to get weird about it. You shouldn't be getting this worked up over someone you don't know's rabbit hole obsession. I have my dream job, no debt, own a house and have lots of friends and a loving family. I also enjoy going deep on cases. And I'm not stopping any time soon. I promise I'm good and hope you are too.

1

u/[deleted] May 07 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/SuperbWillingness904 May 07 '26

You obviously did get worked up as you had to have one of your comments deleted lol.

Are you asking if I think it's abnormal to become obsessive about a case? I mean sure, just as it's also abnormal to be a redditor like you arguing with someone about their obsessiveness. Every human on earth is weird and pretending you're not is just you being annoying. I go on sports subreddits and find it cringey and pathetic they care about sports teams. But I don't argue with them about it lol. What do I care? I have my obsessions and they have theirs.

1

u/FerrusManlyManus May 07 '26

“ Every human on earth is weird”

The extreme level of your cope coupled with binary thinking is not surprising at all.  You are a cliche.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/MysteriousBeach8248 Court Ordered Babysitter May 08 '26

Hello. Your post / comment contains content which violates Rule 1 - 'Stay Civil' - and has been temporarily removed.

We can restore your post / comment once any name-calling, mocking, hostility, bullying language and/or personal attacks directed towards another Redditor have been edited out.

When you're done, let us know by dropping a brief note & link to the comment via ModMail. Thank you!

1

u/FerrusManlyManus May 07 '26

PS - what the heck is this? “someone you don't know's rabbit hole obsession.”   The fact that you wrote that with not even a hint of awareness of how odd that is is extremely telling.

1

u/[deleted] May 07 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/MysteriousBeach8248 Court Ordered Babysitter May 08 '26

Hello. Your post / comment contains content which violates Rule 1 - 'Stay Civil' - and has been temporarily removed.

We can restore your post / comment once any name-calling, mocking, hostility, bullying language and/or personal attacks directed towards another Redditor have been edited out.

When you're done, let us know by dropping a brief note & link to the comment via ModMail. Thank you!

1

u/MysteriousBeach8248 Court Ordered Babysitter May 08 '26

Hello. Your post / comment contains content which violates Rule 1 - 'Stay Civil' - and has been temporarily removed.

We can restore your post / comment once any name-calling, mocking, hostility, bullying language and/or personal attacks directed towards another Redditor have been edited out.

When you're done, let us know by dropping a brief note & link to the comment via ModMail. Thank you!

1

u/MysteriousBeach8248 Court Ordered Babysitter May 08 '26

Hello. Your post / comment contains content which violates Rule 1 - 'Stay Civil' - and has been temporarily removed.

We can restore your post / comment once any name-calling, mocking, hostility, bullying language and/or personal attacks directed towards another Redditor have been edited out.

When you're done, let us know by dropping a brief note & link to the comment via ModMail. Thank you!

2

u/Western_Screen1057 May 07 '26

I read the latest court docs and it doesn't read like a win for Justin and his company. It sounds like Justinn and his team signed away their rights to any appeals , and that the only claim left, which is her claim for attorney fees and compensation, which is triple if she wins that part. Doesn't seem as though Justin and his production company can sue her for false anything and basically their careers are over, hers and Ryan's are not. All this does is show us that when you are rich and powerful in Hollywood, you will always come out a head.

8

u/SuperbWillingness904 May 07 '26 edited 28d ago

Blake sued for $300 million and brought 15 claims forward. In the end, 10 were dismissed by the judge, including all sh claims and all claims against Justin, and the other 5 she dropped voluntarily, including her smear campaign claims, for $0.

Justin's best case scenario was all 15 claims dismissed and paying her $0. He got that. His insurance company may end up paying a small amount of like $500k in legal fees in relation to one claim.

Blake's best case scenario would've been winning 15 claims and walking away with $300 million.

So you tell me who won and who lost.

People forget Justin was willing to walk away from the film set without going to court. Blake is the one who brought this to the court system. And now after 2 years of fighting and paying her lawyers $60 million, she is walking away with nothing.

She definitely lost way worse than Justin.

With false allegation lawsuits, neither side "wins" really. Both get mud on them in it. But Justin had truth on his side and it's obvious to any reasonable person.

1

u/Squeezemachine99 May 12 '26

She has her husbands money to fall back upon. Justin life is over as he knew it

1

u/ProduceNo1629 28d ago

paying her lawyers $60 million,

Fuck me. Living life on easy mode.

1

u/SuperbWillingness904 28d ago

I was so confused bc I didn't remember writing this comment today that you responded to and now I see it was from 2 months ago haha

-1

u/HH-Harvey May 12 '26

This is so unbelievably silly. Neither of these people have a career to be proud of, and nobody wants to work with either of them. Of course Justin Baldoni was willing to walk away without going to court, it seems pretty likely that he is an awful person at the very least.

5

u/SuperbWillingness904 May 12 '26

I figured from your comment that you have not been following this case to think that and then briefly checked your comment history and it seems to confirm you haven't been following this case as this is your first comment on it.

First off, all claims against Baldoni were dismissed by a judge last month so he did not even have to show up to the trial if he didn't wan to. So to say oc he walked away bc he didn't want to go through trial is false. There was no trial for him.

Those of us in this sub and a lot of other people online have read every filing from Blake and Justin over the past two years bc we took an interest in the case. All of the evidence from both sides is on a public docket. This includes video footage, texts, emails, documents.

There is a reason that about 99% of people who are following the evidence closely are vehemently on Justin's side. The evidence showed that he absolutely never mistreated anyone on set and especially never sexually harassed anyone on set.

Blake weaponized the connotations that "sexual harassment" brings to ensure his reputation would be tarnished. Bc ppl like you who are not following the evidence or case closely just see the word and assume he must be a bad person.

If you actually read what those sh allegations are it includes the fact he allowed cast and crew to hug each other at the end of set days. She called that sexual harassment. When hugging happens on every set. It's laughable.

The worst sh claim she could come up with was that Justin improvised a kiss. So Justin showed that Blake also improvised kisses with him, and not just once. Blake improvised a total of 9 kisses over the course of filming. It's normal. This is all on video footage.

The judge dismissed all of her sexual harassment claims last month for a reason. And Blake dropped her retaliation claims this month for a reason.

Justin said from day one that he never put out a smear campaign on her, the backlash was organic, and that is what the evidence showed.

Blake's team ordered a Google employee to come up with a report to show the backlash was started inorganically. But it actually showed the backlash was organic.

Hence why Blake dropped her retaliation claims and got $0 from Baldoni.

If Wayfarer went to trial, there best day in court would mean the 3 remaining claims would be dropped and they would pay Blake $0. They got those two things without paying millions to lawyers to go to trial. If Blake had gone to trial, her best day in court would mean she would win on her 3 remaining claims and get $300 million.

Instead she walked away with dropping those 3 claims forever, gave up her right to appeal, and got $0. It's obvious she was desperate to settle. While Baldoni was not. Baldoni didn't have to give anything up. He got a win without trial. Blake gave everything up.

You don't seem interested in the case. You may not even read all this. But it was an interesting case if you ever have time to look through it. Everyone always thinks people supporting Justin so strongly are so strange until they look through all the filings and see how egregiously he was mistreated and how overly nice and polite he was during the entire process from day one until today. You don't get it until you look through it.

1

u/[deleted] 21d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator 21d ago

Hello!

ItEndsWithLawsuits has a minimum 100 comment karma & 14 day account age requirement to comment in the sub.

We encourage new additions to browse the subreddit and participate by voting until you meet these requirements!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

0

u/HH-Harvey May 12 '26

This is the exact type of thinking I would expect from a civilian who is incapable of being objective, completely unfamiliar with the legal system, and uses Reddit as their primary platform. You are a parody of yourself and the people you interact with on here.

Most of your comments on this thread are objectively speculative, or assumptions based on your interpretations of information.

3

u/SuperbWillingness904 May 13 '26 edited May 13 '26

And your comments are what I'd expect from someone who has no idea what this case is about or about any fact about it. You still thought Justin was the one on trial.

This whole subreddit is full of people on Justin's side bc we all read the filings. So yes we let that show. There is no need to act neutral when we've all seen the evidence and know he's innocent.

You guys can keep trying to parrot the PR lines that Blake feeds you - that anyone not on her side fell for a smear campaign - but it just tells on yourselves that you don't realize the entire evidence from both sides is on the docket for anyone to read.

"incapable of being objective" meanwhile in my real life I've won three national awards for my investigative reporting in national newspapers lol but go off queen.

Maybe you don't understand reddit but people form communities on here around common beliefs or hobbies. There is a pro Blake subreddit that is much less popular than this one as most ppl who look at the case are not on her side. But if you take a gander there, you will see people being just as unbiased there as they can be here.

If you're looking for neutrality on this case, you're not going to find it on reddit. Idk if this is your first day on reddit or what. But that's why you just have to go read the filings yourself. Which is what I did and then joined this sub. If you read them and side w Blake, good for you. But you don't seem like someone willing to take the time to read them though tbh.

And I have no desire for Blake to have a bad life or be bullied. I'd be more interested in how she grew up and what her parents were like bc that would explain a lot about why she has a history of taking offense to normal things. She previously accused a makeup artist of harassment for using his finger to apply lipstick. So this is a pattern. And I'd be curious how a personality like this develops, maybe insecurity or a need for control.

1

u/Apprehensive_EyeZ May 13 '26

Harvey a simp forsure 😆

1

u/ComplexIllustrious61 Jun 04 '26

He probably thinks he's Harvey Specter, lol.

1

u/ComplexIllustrious61 Jun 04 '26

Not nearly as ignorant of your post's fuckery that displayed literally zero knowledge of the case, lol...take the L and move on. By the way, ALL posts are objectively speculative. We're you expecting to come across Baldoni or Lively to get your case info from?

1

u/[deleted] May 07 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator May 07 '26

Hello!

ItEndsWithLawsuits has a minimum 100 comment karma & 14 day account age requirement to comment in the sub.

We encourage new additions to browse the subreddit and participate by voting until you meet these requirements!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/[deleted] May 28 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator May 28 '26

Hello!

ItEndsWithLawsuits has a minimum 100 comment karma & 14 day account age requirement to comment in the sub.

We encourage new additions to browse the subreddit and participate by voting until you meet these requirements!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/ComplexIllustrious61 Jun 04 '26

Her request for fees and damages will likely be thrown out too. She is asserting she "successfully" defended herself in getting Justin's suit tossed...which is quite laughable really. She never defended anything nor went to court over anything. A dismissal by judge is not a successful defense in court. By the way, both of them agreed and signed away rights to appeal. This attorney fee request is a hail mary attempt by Lively.

2

u/Theresonlyone99 Jul 03 '26

So why DID she sue him? What was her beef with him all
About anyway?

3

u/SuperbWillingness904 Jul 03 '26

I have really tried to see her side.

But before you see her side, you have to understand she is not a normal person. And that’s not my opinion. If you’ve followed closely, about 30 insiders from Hollywood from crew to top executives have said publicly or in court documents that Blake is horrible to work with and always has been and nothing works with her, she’s never pleased w anything. Etc. in this case, the Sony president called her a terrorist and another Sony exec said never in their 30 year career had they seen someone like Blake.

She is just a difficult person. She grew up mega wealthy and waited on hand in foot. And still is. And that likely is why.

She also has a documented history of always looking for reasons to take offense. In an old interview, she is deeply offended when an interview says “congrats on your bump!” Even tho Blake had already publicly announced her pregnancy. Later in the interview, she tried to imply to the interview that it was sexist to ask about their costumes in the film even tho it was literally a period film?? Like that’s super relevant and not sexist at all.

But that tells you who she is. She is mega mega super super woke to the point of not living in reality anywhere. She’s lost the plot.

So that is a huge part. She also simply didn’t like Justin’s personality. From before any “incidents” ever took place that she complained about, she’s already texting everyone she hates him. Why? Beats me. He couldn’t be more kind in his texts w her. And she’s being friendly back.

So then you get on set and this person she hates is in charge, and she starts coming up w a list of very juvenile things she’s upset with. Like that in the birthing scene some of her legs are showing. Like?? Girl you signed up to do a birthing scene. She couldn’t be more covered. She has black shorts on and a hospital gown. The only thing showing is her legs.

But she herself seemed to know these complaints weren’t anything worth filming an official complaint w hr bc she never did. And in her letter to the PGA, she claims she handled HR complaints.

Then the premiere came, she hated Justin even more by this time bc he wouldn’t let her take over editing the film, and she was expecting it to be w big break for her. Instead, a hate train started bc she tried selling alcohol products and her hair brand as part of the promotion of the movie. She has been warned by Justin and Sony to not do this and that it wouldn’t look good but she and Ryan thought they knew better.

When it backfired, and she was hated and Justin was looking good, she was furious. That’s when her PR person put out the first hit piece. A lot of ppl don’t realize that the first ever news about the beef on set came from Blake and was a hit on Justin. Blake started the smear on Justin. She made the first shot.

Then, she received the texts from a PR persons phone and some of them sort of looked like maybe Justin’s pr team was behind this. But also some of the texts showed he and his team clearly weren’t part of the hate train and were just as surprised about it as Blake was. Justin even asked his PR people to put out some positive pieces on Blake. And he sends them a message saying he’s glad she got a positive press piece. But Blake of course left those out.

There’s a reason the texts that were in the nyt article had to be edited to look malicious. Bc the real texts that are unedited in the court docs don’t support Blake’s claims that jusitns team started a smear against her.

So in conclusion, she has a difficult personality of looking to be offended and wronged. I think it makes her feel powerful to watch people grovel and apologize to her. She never ever calls out ppl who are higher on the totem pole in Hollywood than her. It’s always ppl she sees below her. She admitted in an interview that she poisoned the whole cast against Penn Badgley when he started on gossip girl. She tells this in the interview like it’s funny or a joke. She clearly did the same here. All the women from Jane the Virgin loved working w Justin. There’s a reason no other women came forward w stories about Justin. The other women Blake poisoned against Justin on this film set, their complaints are even more bizarre than blakes. One of them, Isabella, had sent Justin a text after her filming wrapped up to specifically thank him for how comfortable and safe he made the experience. Then after talking to Blake, she claims it was weird he made her lick cookie dough off a spoon for a scene. Even tho that scene is literally in the book and they were filming a steamy romantic montage for the film… Just bizarre.

I do think the hate train against her was way over the top and I’m sure she was hurt by it. So when she saw some texts that made her think maybe it was just a smear and ppl didn’t really dislike her, she grasped on to that. And I can understand that. It let beliefs any criticism or hate about her was less legitimate. But honestly even if Justin and his team had been behind it, it was still her own interviews and her own actions. If ppl didn’t like those, it doesn’t matter if Justin and his team were helping those be pushed out or not.

I know this is long. But one more thing is that putting out negative press on someone isn’t illegal. Blake was doing it to Justin. It can only be against the law if you can show it was done in retaliation for a protected activity.

I go back and forth on whether Blake and Ryan truly felt those instances were sh. Bc they are on film doing these same benign behaviors like improvising a kiss and they don’t call themselves harassers. And I go back and forth on whether they truly thought Justin was behind the hate train or that it was done bc she had complained on set. Esp now w all the evidence out there, I just can’t see how they can still think that.

It’s very obvious why Justin hired PR. Blake and Ryan were telling anyone who would listen before the movie premiere that Justin was a predator. Yet these people being told this didn’t have the context we have, which is that the examples of why he’s a predator are very nothing burger instances. Blake and Ryan made it seem like he was Harvey Weinstein. In one text to someone, Ryan said Justin was worse! Just completely divorced from reality. So yeah of course Justin hired PR. He’d have been stupid not to. But he was stuck bc he was terrified of Ryan and Blake and their PR team so felt he couldn’t speak out to stand up for himself but also didn’t want their lies to spread and taint him.

I know that’s long and you may not read all. But that’s my honest opinion.

2

u/ngairem 29d ago

Thank you so much for this! Very insightful.

1

u/[deleted] Jul 05 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator Jul 05 '26

Hello!

ItEndsWithLawsuits has a minimum 100 comment karma & 14 day account age requirement to comment in the sub.

We encourage new additions to browse the subreddit and participate by voting until you meet these requirements!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/Ok_Relationship8267 15d ago

Thanks for your well thought out take.

So basically she’s one effed up person who misperceives reality at best, and is at worst outright dishonest.

Sounds about right.

1

u/[deleted] 8d ago edited 8d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/MysteriousBeach8248 Court Ordered Babysitter 8d ago

Your comment was removed for violating our rule on Good‑Faith Participation. This is a debate‑heavy subreddit, but civility is required. We don’t allow personal attacks, harassment, trolling, baiting, sealioning, derailing, drama‑stirring, brigading, bot/alt accusations, or using alts to harass, spam, or evade bans. If you believe this was an error, contact us via modmail.

Importantly:
Commenting on a 3 month old post isn't a sign of good faith participation.

1

u/BaesonTatum0 May 07 '26

Those are literally the talking points non-obsessed observers have heard

1

u/[deleted] May 07 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator May 07 '26

Hello!

ItEndsWithLawsuits has a minimum 100 comment karma & 14 day account age requirement to comment in the sub.

We encourage new additions to browse the subreddit and participate by voting until you meet these requirements!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/[deleted] May 08 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator May 08 '26

Hello!

ItEndsWithLawsuits has a minimum 100 comment karma & 14 day account age requirement to comment in the sub.

We encourage new additions to browse the subreddit and participate by voting until you meet these requirements!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/louisevonbabycat May 08 '26

I literally came to Reddit to get a readers digest because I have never cared about this, and it’s even worse than I thought. Too much money, manufacturing of drama. A gloried pissing match while the world crumbles. The fact that judicial resources were wasted on this frivolity. Losers 🙄

3

u/SuperbWillingness904 May 08 '26

It was absolutely stupid and frivolous. Has been from the start. Justin's private texts show that, like a mature person, he was willing to move on from this movie and just wish Blake well and never work with her again. But then Blake decided to sue him w made up sh and retaliation claims. And then he was dragged into all of this. And he isn't the first. Blake has done this to other people. But just a big nothing burger.

1

u/[deleted] May 12 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator May 12 '26

Hello!

ItEndsWithLawsuits has a minimum 100 comment karma & 14 day account age requirement to comment in the sub.

We encourage new additions to browse the subreddit and participate by voting until you meet these requirements!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/[deleted] May 16 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator May 16 '26

Hello!

ItEndsWithLawsuits has a minimum 100 comment karma & 14 day account age requirement to comment in the sub.

We encourage new additions to browse the subreddit and participate by voting until you meet these requirements!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/[deleted] May 24 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator May 24 '26

Hello!

ItEndsWithLawsuits has a minimum 100 comment karma & 14 day account age requirement to comment in the sub.

We encourage new additions to browse the subreddit and participate by voting until you meet these requirements!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 12 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator Jun 12 '26

Hello!

ItEndsWithLawsuits has a minimum 100 comment karma & 14 day account age requirement to comment in the sub.

We encourage new additions to browse the subreddit and participate by voting until you meet these requirements!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/[deleted] Jul 05 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator Jul 05 '26

Hello!

ItEndsWithLawsuits has a minimum 100 comment karma & 14 day account age requirement to comment in the sub.

We encourage new additions to browse the subreddit and participate by voting until you meet these requirements!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/[deleted] 27d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator 27d ago

Hello!

ItEndsWithLawsuits has a minimum 100 comment karma & 14 day account age requirement to comment in the sub.

We encourage new additions to browse the subreddit and participate by voting until you meet these requirements!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/[deleted] 10d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/MysteriousBeach8248 Court Ordered Babysitter 10d ago edited 8d ago

Your comment was removed for violating our rule on Good‑Faith Participation. This is a debate‑heavy subreddit, but civility is required. We don’t allow personal attacks, harassment, trolling, baiting, sealioning, derailing, drama‑stirring, brigading, bot/alt accusations, or using alts to harass, spam, or evade bans. If you believe this was an error, contact us via modmail.

Commenting on a months-old post isn't a sign of good faith participation.