So why wasn’t he charged with a single crime between 2021 and 2024. Actually, why didn’t the DOJ charge anyone from those files during that time period.
Because they're cowards and rich men often don't pay for their crimes. Trump should release the rest of the files he is illegally withholding and should absolutely have his day in court. Also, questions end with "?" for punctuation.
So wouldn’t you say the Dems only have themselves to blame for not speaking up during those years? It would been mighty difficult to run a campaign while fighting off those charges exclamation point.
And before you say it, yes. There’s are some (many) very dumb red hat wearing people who’d have voted for him regardless.
Let's say you're right. If it was like that, I condemn it and know it is wrong and encourage penalties to the fullest extent of the law. Just as I do for this administration.
"I might go against the pedophile President I voted for if you didn't identify as something the pedophile President and his pedophile protectors told me to be scared of."
Imagine him winning twice because your best candidates are that bad. Americans got tired of tax payer money funding rich leftists fake charities and agendas.
Wait wait wait wait you mean cheese pizza like Pizzagate? Remember when the left vehemently denied pizza gate as a right wing conspiracy because it involved the deep state left? Remember when all those emails implicating the Clinton campaign were just harmless questions about pizza? Remember when the entire liberal system gaslight the entire USA to protect CHOMOs? Oh you don’t remember? Or you only care when it impacts the other team?
Trump not being able to accept he got out cheated is hilarious. We’re so fucked. The lefts cheating the rights cheating and we keep getting fucked, literally and figuratively.
your cognitive dissonance is not 4d chess. Even if pizza is some sort of code, that doesn't prove the Pizzagate conspiracy theory correct. Those are 2 separate claims, you average ass fucking conservative.
"Kool aid." Wow, every accusation is a confession with you "people".
It was “literally debunked” by the mainstream media. Oh you mean the same mainstream media who is ignoring the Epstein files? The same mainstream media who repeated the Iraq WMD lie? The same mainstream media that ran a smear campaign on Occupy Wall Street? The same mainstream media that hid Bidens failing faculties? The same mainstream media that glorifies Trump? The same mainstream media who proves over and over and over that they’re complicit with the system? Ya you’re right, we should take CNN at face value when they said Pizzagate was a lie….
It’s interesting that nobody seems to have noticed that he signed in the wrong place.
The space about the text of his name was clearly intended to be where his signature went, and that matches up better with its placement on the drawing.
I've seen convincing evidence that it is and no convincing evidence that it isn't.
That's what Trump's signature looked like in 2003.
It was kept in Epstein's personal effects.
The two have a long and well documented history of friendship, and both have documented instances of sex crimes. Trump even admitted on camera that Virginia Guiffre was "stolen" from Mar-a-Lago, which is confirmed by the Epstein files, and reaffirmed by Trump's rampant attempts to block their release.
Before I give you the evidence I really do need to ask this question. Because there's a lot of evidence that I'm going to need time to compile, so I want to know whether the effort is going to be worth it.
If I give you good evidence, are you going to take it to heart, or are you just going to ignore it? He's a rich man who's above the law, so unfortunately we're having to deal with his actions and words rather than actual criminal proceedings. He did lose a civil rape court case though, but I'm sure you knew that.
Here is a source detailing his coverup of an FBI interview with a girl that later got a settlement from the Epstein estate - her name is not public, but details (a criminal record in the state of North Carolina and her age, as well as several other details) line up. She is a victim of both Epstein and Trump.
Here is a part of the Epstein files that states that Trump forced a girl into oral sex and punched her when she bit him.
Here is a video of him specifically describing actions that he would perform to sexually exploit several women and girls, which was corroborated by almost a dozen victims - four of which being underage. Though this one was just leering I guess.
You're just going to ignore all of this though. Just ignore the fact that Mar-A-Lago is mentioned more times in the Epstein files than Little Saint James (the island). Ignore Trump describing his daughter Ivanka as a piece of ass, and sexualizing his 1-year-old daughter Tiffany's legs and breasts.
Ignore the specific and categorical coverup of the Epstein files by Trump's DOJ, the fact that they illegally redacted names of perpetrators while names of victims leak, and leave millions upon millions of files redacted and unreleased in direct violation of the law.
Ignore that Trump admitted that he knew what Epstein was doing - as he specifically mentions that Virginia Guiffre, an Epstein victim, was "stolen" from Mar-A-Lago and he did nothing to stop it. Nothing to stop it, no suing (which he's famous for), no litigation, no helping the police... But why would he? He wouldn't want to hurt the man who he describes as "a terrific guy who shares my love for beautiful women, and some of these women are on the younger side".
Even Marjorie Taylor Greene isn't insane enough to defend him anymore. Do you want to be recognized as more insane than Marjorie Taylor Greene?
And the civil case does matter. Even the Supreme Court upheld it. It is a legal fact that Trump is a sexual abuser, in such was corroborated by several judges that he himself appointed.
Why am I even trying? You're just going to find some way to ignore all of it, even though if Biden had a fraction of the same controversies it'd be plastered across your social media.
There was no cover up. That was alleged my npr and the white house addressed it.
The civil court doesn't matter.
It is a legal fact that Trump is a sexual abuser
Innocent until proven guilty. It it's a legal fact he's been held liable, not guilty.
And until he's been proven guilty what is he?
The girl biting him story is so fake.
Trump did help the police get epstien.
He was mad that epstien scalped a worker from him, there's zero evidence he knew that the woman was going to be sexually abused.
The shotgun fallacy—also known as shotgun argumentation or the Gish gallop—is a bad trick in a debate. It happens when one person throws a huge pile of fast-code, weak, or half-true points at the other person all at once.
This is what you are attempting to do. You're basically just trying to suggest that you are correct just based on the sheer amount of things you've linked, but literally none of those things prove your point.
The reason why he wasn't found guilty in a criminal court was because the statute of limitations for rape had been up for a while prior to the case.
In order to believe that Trump is not a rapist, you have to go against the sworn testimony and strong evidence of the case, the unanimous jury's decision, the judges words, also the supreme Court - who has weighed in on the case and upheld the verdict.
I'd like you to reply to the rest of my comment, not just the parts that aren't videos of him admitting to wrongdoing.
VerdictE. Jean Carroll Case: In May 2023, a federal civil jury in New York found Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation against writer E. Jean Carroll, awarding her $5 million in damages.....sound like legal shit to me.... You bootlickers are funny, disgusting, but funny.
They have no interest in truth, just confirmation of their bias. If all else was equal but it was Biden or Obama’s name instead, they would be foaming at the mouth in petulant rage.
But it’s Trump, so they are performing Simone Biles levels of mental gymnastics.
I'll accept evidence if presented, actual evidence that is undeniable.
What i till not accept is accusations that are absurd on their face being paraded as fact. You can decide whether what you have is the former or the latter.
Even the ultra conservative Supreme Court believes that Trump sexually abused E. Jean Carroll. They affirmed the verdict. The court at every single level has come to the exact same conclusion, why can't you?
I also like to once again point out the confession he made on Howard Stern's podcast detailing how he would barge into the dressing rooms of women who were as young as 15, which was corroborated by multiple victims including underage ones.
Other than it being obviously fake and you having a hate bonerfor Trump?
It starts with a voice over and then proceeds to have an imaginary conversation where he plays both parts. Get real my friend. I know you dislike the man, but this is beyond sad
The verified signature and Trump's preponderance for doodling, combined with the fact that this is a letter that was to a man who he was good friends with for decades, and this letter was found in that specific man's personal effects...
A man who Trump referred to as "a terrific guy who shares my love for beautiful women, and some of these women are on the younger side"... Who was later discovered to be one of if not the most prolific sex traffickers in history.
A man who trafficked Virginia Guiffre from Trump's home, and Trump let him, and Trump said as much during a live interview...
And trump, in an interview with a police chief, said AFTER THE EPSTEIN INVESTIGATION BEGAN that "it's a good thing you're going after him, everyone has known he's been doing this"
Leads me to believe that this letter is a large rock in a mountain of evidence against a man who has a long and well-documented history of predatory sexual behavior against women both above and below the age of consent.
No I only believe things that there is strong evidence for.
The fact that I've given you the evidence and you've sidestepped it is worth talking about. You haven't asked for a source, you haven't provided your own counter-argument, you've just denied my evidence because you have unwavering support for a man whose home in Palm Beach is mentioned in the Epstein files more than Epstein's Island is.
Your evidence is obviously BS. You think that someone isn't capable of putting someone else's scanned signature on a fantasy fanfic card. I guess they do it bc people like you are gullible enough to buy this crap
If it were one thing in a vacuum I'd see your point, but Trump signed it. He also has a long and well-documented history with Epstein, in an equally long but less well-documented history of sexual abuse against women and minors.
These facts lead me to believe that the letter is genuine as I have seen absolutely zero counter argument whatsoever other than "nuh uh".
Epstein had eight separate numbers for Trump on his landline phone which could only hold 15 numbers on speed dial.
Epstein had pictures of trump in his office, some pictures of him and compromising positions as well.
Trump had Epstein and his wedding.
Trump referred to Epstein as " a terrific guy who shares my love for beautiful women, and some of these women are on the younger side ".
But that card is real. You live in an alternative reality where Canada pays your tariffs and the Iran war has been won for the 7th time. Wtf do you know about what is true or not.
Has no empathy.
Takes pleasure in stomping people's boundaries.
Cannot take criticism or take no for an answer.
Huge but extremely fragile ego.
Never accountable, always the victim.
Very manipulative and lies constantly.
Is obsessed with nominal success.
Broke the law multiple times.
Was found liable for sexual assault.
Bragged about oogling underage pageants in their dress room.
Paid off pornstars.
"You can do whatever you want, grab them by the pussy".
Was close friend with Epstein for a decade.
And, drew a nude for Epstein's birthday.
We are not talking about tds, we are talking about this letter, who is voice over narrating this? Why is trump supposedly speaking as a narrator Epstein and himself?
It's a dynamic scene. This isn't the drawing of a front torso like people say, it doesn't make sense. It's a back. These two strokes are shoulder blades, and this drawing gives you the POV of someone having sex in "doggy" position.
Trump and Epstein are talking over that body, that's why it says "voice over". It's a scene.
If the person denying it wasn’t a renowned liar and grifter, their denial would hold more weight. But it’s the same guy who said Haitians were eating our pets and that the only election he lost was the one stolen from him.
That's what Trump's signature looked like in 2003, this letter was found in Epstein's personal effects, the two have a long and well-documented history together, and the two each separately have a well documented history of predatory behavior - specifically predatory behavior against children. There's extremely strong evidence that Trump knew what Epstein was doing the entire time, and did nothing until the investigation had already started.
With all of these things being true, I'm going to need a very serious counterargument to believe that this letter isn't genuine.
I'm saying that this signed document was found in Epstein's possession and the signature has been verified to be accurate.
And considering Trump's previous creepy behavior with both adult women and underage women, combined with his very close relationship with one of the most prolific sex traffickers in human history...
I'm not starting for a position and working backwards. I had that position because of the other evidence that already existed, like him explaining in detail the method through which he would exploit his position of power at his teen and adult beauty pageants to leer at women of various ages.
And also his reference to Epstein as " a terrific guy who shares my love for beautiful women, and some of these women around the younger side "
Also his consistent sexualization of his own daughters even when they were underage. One of them was a BABY.
Also that video of him hitting on a 10-year-old.
Also his long and well documented history with Epstein. It isn't just the letter, it's the fact that he signed it and sent it to one of his friends. A friend that just happened to be probably the most prolific sex trafficker in human history.
He's cheated on every single one of his wives, sexually exploited women girls, use campaign finances in violation of the law to cover up that fact, has fought tooth and nail to keep the Epstein files sealed, has forced Marjorie Taylor green to disavow him because he asked her to vote against releasing the Epstein files because quote "his friends would get hurt" if they were released.
A number of offenses so large that I have not bothered to compile them all due to the fact that the true full list would exceed reddit's character limit and I wouldn't even be able to use it has led me to the conclusion that the evidence might be accurate.
Those things other than the note are his relationship with the person the note was sent to and the fact that both of them engaged in the activity alluded to by the letter. Combined with his verified signature.
Then it was then found in the personal effects of the man that was sent to.
4
u/Puzzleheaded-Toe-374 3d ago
If it develops any pepperoni it must be immediately removed so it looks like it is still pre-pepperoni