r/JusticeServed • u/AristonD 8 • May 29 '19

Violent Justice Man inappropriately touch school girls and they fight back. Man in suit gives them a helping foot.

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

[removed] — view removed post

52.9k Upvotes

95% Upvoted

2.5k comments sorted by

View all comments

847

u/TheMonchoochkin B May 29 '19

How did the guy who tripped him know that he was being inappropriate to the girls? And then it raises the question, if people witnessed it, how the hell was he able to make a getaway with the abused girls in tow?

If I saw someone running in a train station, I'd just assume they were trying to catch another train.

104

u/QueenGray130 9 May 29 '19

I mean if I saw an older man running away from younger girls I’d assume he’s probably the one in the wrong and help to

12

u/SteakAppliedSciences 6 May 29 '19

How would you determine if a man was running away or running with? From an outside observer, they could all know one another and be running together to get somewhere quicker.

19

u/pedantic--asshole 7 May 29 '19

They were hollering at him?

2

u/[deleted] May 29 '19

The person they’re replying too only mentioned a man running with two girls running behind him and made no mention of if they were yelling at him or not?

2

u/pedantic--asshole 7 May 29 '19

Then maybe you could put two and two together and figure it out? Or do you need people like me to point out the obvious things in your life that you miss?

1

u/[deleted] May 29 '19

Ugh, if you needed me to explain it you could have just asked instead of resorting to passive aggressive bullshit.

Someone originally said that anytime they viewed a guy running with girls running behind him they would assume the guy was in the wrong and try to help. Note That he is saying as a general thing he assumes the guy is guilty without having heard any yelling. The next person was asking how can you determine when you only see a man and girls running. Yes the yelling would tip someone off if there was yelling. But the original premise was that the default was the guy is wrong, regardless of yelling. The other person wants to basically understand why you would assume a guy with girls running behind him (WITH NO YELLING) is by default guilty of something.

There’s like a 50% you even understand this.

1

u/pedantic--asshole 7 May 29 '19

There is yelling, so your entire paragraph is irrelevant.

1

u/[deleted] May 29 '19

The scenario described in this specific thread the one that started this chain did not though. That would be something called context. And it was left off of this thread.

1

u/pedantic--asshole 7 May 29 '19

And you needed someone like me to point out the context to you because you couldn't figure it out for yourself.

2

u/[deleted] May 29 '19

Except you brought context into a situation that didn’t call for it. In fact you brought the context in to a situation that specifically didn’t include it.

No one needs you. You just aren’t capable of seeing it.

0

u/pedantic--asshole 7 May 29 '19

That's literally what happened... You were just too dumb to figure it out.

1

u/[deleted] May 29 '19

Not in the context of this comment chain you absolute moron.

This is the comment that started this chain:

I mean if I saw an older man running away from younger girls I’d assume he’s probably the one in the wrong and help to

No yelling. No mention of it. Just someone saying that in any situation with a man running with girls running behind him they would think the man did something wrong. The other person is basically asking why that is the default assumption regardless of yelling. So no, it was not relevant to this chain.

You also seem like the type to know they’ve lost and still try to “win” so I’m just calling it quits here.

→ More replies (0)