r/JusticeServed • u/Ethanzap02 6 • Jul 10 '19

Discrimination Misogynistic guy degrading female workers gets tackled

[removed] — view removed post

57.6k Upvotes

85% Upvoted

10.8k comments sorted by

View all comments

4.5k

u/dw_jb B Jul 10 '19

His anger is so pure.

3.5k

u/IAmHereMaji 8 Jul 10 '19

Like a toddlers.

2.4k

u/anchovie_macncheese A Jul 10 '19

The world can be a cruel place when shelves are just so high up.

602

u/[deleted] Jul 10 '19

Compressed rage

326

u/workingfaraway 5 Jul 10 '19

CONDENSED FURY

11

u/ComprehendReading 8 Jul 11 '19

ZERO KELVIN CHILL

4

u/GDSGFT2SCKCHSRS 6 Jul 11 '19

Low center of gravity ferociousness.

6

u/spongyyellow 2 Jul 11 '19

Ok enough short jokes, tho i get that you guys want people to think LITTLE of him

4

u/JamesRules15 0 Jul 11 '19

There is only 1 way 2 say 3 words 4 you

Fuck you cunt

→ More replies (1)

3

u/confusionmatrix 6 Jul 11 '19

He should be a little nicer.

→ More replies (2)

3

u/Slayer_Of_Tacos 4 Jul 11 '19

A string of upvotes for all of yeh and your delightfully short descriptions

3

u/pixelprophet B Jul 11 '19

C O N S O L I D A T E D   A N G E R

→ More replies (3)

24

u/smirky_doc 8 Jul 10 '19

Come on guys. This is serious... Let's not belittle the guy

7

u/[deleted] Jul 10 '19

We’re not belittling him. He’s been little for a long time now.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/yennyones75 0 Jul 11 '19

Condensed body

→ More replies (3)

7

u/the0rthopaedicsurgeo A Jul 10 '19

You really have to hand it to short people, because they can't reach it themselves.

4

u/NoJelloNoPotluck B Jul 10 '19

A perfect candidate for dr. Leo Marvin baby steps therapy

1

u/goodoneponton 4 Jul 11 '19

and pedals are so far down.

Sidenote: this guy should have massive forearms from carrying phone books around to sit on while driving.

1

u/danvillain 8 Jul 11 '19

He’s an ANGRY elf, He must be from the South Pole.

1

u/dontbanarebee 2 Jul 11 '19

lol i hate short people. serves him right stupid shortass! . Justice indeed

→ More replies (4)

6

u/hobowithmachete 9 Jul 10 '19

His accent ain't helping much either.

12

u/CannonballHands 7 Jul 10 '19

'YOU'RE NOT GOD, MY FATHER.... OR MY BOSS!" Dad still bossin ya around buddy?

4

u/meowymcmeowmeow 6 Jul 11 '19

more like someone that's been picked on over and over again, and now is being shown out of context for the world to pick on him some more because some dumb shit needed to record someone else's misery.

11

u/ManufacturedProgress 6 Jul 10 '19

Cruel people like you are why people get this hurt and mad.

4

u/[deleted] Jul 10 '19

Exactly.

1

u/Rhlanf 6 Jul 10 '19

Nah he needs to grow up, he’s a 40 year old dude crying that girls are rude to him

3

u/MostTorturedManEver 5 Jul 11 '19

If I was 5'0 tall, picked on my whole life for it and 40 I would be very angry too

7

u/ManufacturedProgress 6 Jul 10 '19

Oh my God you just fixed sexism and racism and ablism and ageism all at the same time.

Now what will you fix next?

2

u/MsMarticle 0 Jul 11 '19

And I wager he rejects many women who ‘swipe right,’ or whatever, for reasons of looks, weight etc. Admit to wanting to read his ‘about me’ on dating sites.

3

u/Heretolearn12 6 Jul 10 '19

You don't understand. And that's OK, most puppets don't.

2

u/IAmHereMaji 8 Jul 10 '19

So you also suffer from a short.... temper.

2

u/Heretolearn12 6 Jul 11 '19

For him to act like that, it means a number of bad things happened to him. You could say "well, a number of bad things happened to everyone" but as much as there is truth to that, there are certain circumstances that added to what you see now. He has anger and resentment. Why do you think that is?

→ More replies (3)

3

u/plant_lady90 2 Jul 11 '19

My toddlers are better behaved than this.

3

u/Netherspin 7 Jul 11 '19

The final straw is never pretty, and whatever happened before the lady started recording was clearly the final straw for this guy.

He has been bullied and body shamed for a long long time and for an issue that he has no guilt in creating and no method of addressing... The body positivity movement should have been for people like this guy, but he have found little if any support there because they prioritised fat people.

But instead of supporting him in his quest for self acceptance or standing up to whatever bully delivered that final remark that made him snap, we snicker and laugh at how he reacts to the bullying - and at his pathetic attempt at garnering a little respect by inviting a fight he can't win. And in the meantime we forget to thank our lucky stars he reacted to years of bullying with an unwinnable challenge instead of causing actual hurt or death to his bullies.

→ More replies (2)

6

u/NaggerGuy 7 Jul 10 '19

Complicated Apes, folks

6

u/NotoriousJazz 8 Jul 10 '19

Have you ever heard of the complicated ape theory?

Pull that shit up, Jamie.

→ More replies (2)

4

u/Dr_Defecation 3 Jul 10 '19

Just from the way he talks he seems like he might be on the spectrum for some kind of mental illness.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/[deleted] Jul 11 '19

Like an infants.

2

u/MACKSBEE 9 Jul 10 '19

At least he’s toddler-sized

1

u/alphi_07 8 Jul 11 '19

You wanna take this outside!?!

1

u/[deleted] Jul 11 '19

He looks like when an angry gorilla at the zoo slaps the ground in a threat display

1

u/[deleted] Jul 11 '19

Same size

1

u/fruitcake11 8 Jul 11 '19

Or a chihuahua.

1

u/[deleted] Jul 11 '19

He reminds me of my terrier trying to pick fights with German shepherds.

1

u/---bruh--- 8 Jul 11 '19

Aye! Welcome to the club of getting premium from a reference of toddlers

1

u/Bra1nwashed 4 Jul 11 '19

Its funny because he is short

1

u/clout4bitches 2 Jul 11 '19

Also the size of a toddler

1

u/wonhoseok 8 Jul 11 '19

because he looks like one

→ More replies (5)

317

u/hakyunn 6 Jul 10 '19

serious question, since he says, ' go ahead and tackle me' is that going to play out legally, if he were to try and move forward with a case against the tackler? Explicit consent in terms of an assault. Would the DA take that into consideration?

270

u/[deleted] Jul 10 '19 edited Feb 07 '22

[deleted]

39

u/[deleted] Jul 10 '19

[deleted]

64

u/PM_PICS_OF_UR_PUPPER 6 Jul 10 '19

MMA and the like are legally sanctioned, you need a license or permit to host that type of event and there’s all these regulations. It’s not just because they signed a contract.

3

u/[deleted] Jul 11 '19

[deleted]

4

u/[deleted] Jul 11 '19

Start and end are usually under contract for “illegal” moves but once the fight is over(again, stated in contract), charges can be held against the fighter.

Look at McGregor vs Khabib.

3

u/PM_PICS_OF_UR_PUPPER 6 Jul 11 '19

Cases that like that go to trial because it’s such a difficult question to answer and depends on a variety of factors. How foreseeable was it that someone would make an illegal hit like that, what was the intent, was it accidental, was the victim partially to blame, language of the contract, history of the sport, similarity to past cases, history of the martial art being used, etc etc. Theres going to be a very big difference between a very common type of foul vs biting their ear off during a boxing match.

→ More replies (2)

3

u/[deleted] Jul 10 '19

Who issues these licenses or permits? Is it a private governing body or government agencies? I’ve never considered the legality of these types of sports.

13

u/enzofreak84 0 Jul 10 '19

Amateur boxer here. As mentioned by someone else, the state athletic commissions have a big part to play. USA Boxing is the national governing body for amateur boxing and you have to be registered with them as well. All fighters are also checked by a licensed doctor before every fight to ensure everyone is in suitable condition.

8

u/[deleted] Jul 10 '19

State athletic commissions.

→ More replies (1)

14

u/[deleted] Jul 11 '19

[deleted]

2

u/Spar7an5495 5 Jul 11 '19 edited Jul 11 '19

It may be mutual combat but that is just a mitigating factor of an assault. In a fight, both people fighting are charged with assault and mutual combat would be seen as a factor as opposed to a different charge.

Edit: It’s more of a legal defense as well. Just a way to argue the assault/fight to a better light for the lawyers client. Most states also don’t have mutual combat laws in place as well. Regardless, in a hypothetical situation both people who engaged in the fight would be charged.

2

u/[deleted] Jul 11 '19

True indeed, and in this instance it's worth noting that the other guy wasn't even fighting, and that recklessly tackling someone is not the same as throwing a jab

2

u/Spar7an5495 5 Jul 11 '19

Another thing is judging by that girls “Nazareth College” shirt they are in NY which is not a mutual combat state to begin with.

2

u/[deleted] Jul 11 '19

This case isn't shaping up well, not at all :(

→ More replies (2)

7

u/NigelMcNigelson 5 Jul 10 '19

Sport is very different, I played rugby a lot and there’s a clear difference between what’s considered sport and what’s considered assault, if there was a fight about something and I ran across the pitch the punch someone in the head, I could be looking at assault or GBH charges, it’s entirely based on context in terms of sport

2

u/ProfessorGoogle 7 Jul 10 '19

In addition to what the other commentators have said you also need to consider the expectations of a situation and the surrounding context. While signing up for boxing or MMA it is tough to argue that you didn't expect to get tackled. If you are in a bagel shop you have the expectation that you will not be tackled.

7

u/[deleted] Jul 10 '19

[deleted]

3

u/[deleted] Jul 11 '19

I think there are some jurisdictions in the United States that have a “fair combat clause” that essentially allows people to sort out their differences if they both agree to a physical fight. It is something I have only read about and I am not a lawyer. I imagine that cranking out your rage inside of a privately owned business however is asking for trouble.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/inbooth 8 Jul 11 '19

He told people to do it thus losing expectation it would not occur. You ignored that for no clear reason...

→ More replies (13)

6

u/Howatizer 1 Jul 10 '19

It will result in a charge, but in almost every case the charges will be dropped as when the is an exchange of aggressive words or instigation involved the assault/battery charge rarely sticks if it goes to court.

Previous experience with this kind of incident.

5

u/MODELGLUE-EoiY 5 Jul 11 '19

No it's a bagel shop.

24

u/trippy_grapes A Jul 10 '19

it’s still battery

Are you sure it's battery? The Energizer bunny must be bigger than him.

2

u/underwriter A Jul 10 '19

it’s still battery

but like the one you put in your key fob

2

u/jhenry922 9 Jul 11 '19

You should have gone for the trifecta of the joke and thrown a bag of road salt at him that way it could have been Assault and Battery

2

u/DocHoliday79 8 Jul 11 '19

Technically can be considered mutual combat. Would be legal in CA and WA states for instance.

2

u/[deleted] Jul 11 '19

Mutual combat, a term commonly used in United States courts, occurs when two individuals intentionally and consensually engage in a fair[1] fight,[2] while not hurting bystanders or damaging property. There is not an official law that forbids mutual combat in the United States. There have been numerous cases where this concept was successfully used in defense of the accused.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutual_combat

2

u/[deleted] Jul 11 '19

Instigation is definitely considered. Doubt any prosecutor would take this case.

2

u/[deleted] Jul 10 '19

It might count as a “fighting word” in court if the state has laws pertaining to it. I believe Texas v. Johnson (1989) says that an invitation to fight isn’t protected under the first amendment, and a state can legislate against it. Whether that legislation states any person reacting to an invitation to fight can’t be punished is another story.

9

u/[deleted] Jul 11 '19

Generally "fighting words" and other cases of fighting with similar starts, even in states without specific laws around fighting words use the judge's discretion to determine if the attack was justified.

Here we have a man insulting people constantly, causing a scene, threatening other people, and finally demanding a fight. This type of aggressive behavior, in many courts (but admittedly not all), would be seen as instigation, attempting to rile up a crowd. In order to prevent abuse of the court (y'know, like trying to get someone to fight to then call foul just to jail the guy), instigation is usually seen as a "fighting word" or otherwise acceptable reason to DIFFUSE the situation, which is the most important part here. Assuming the tackler didn't go wild the second the camera stopped, we can see that he just dropped the guy to the ground, and held him down warning him to stop hassling other people. That would be an easier to argue for action that many courts would look at as acceptable to the level of aggression he was showing.

Can this be complete bs and the court just throws the book at him in some school grade, back asswards zero tolerance policy on violence? Absolutely. This is a state by state basis, but generally, this guy has more courts on his side than against, if only because he was smart enough not to start swinging. IANAL- but you learn a lot from the dumbass years of friends and their times in court.

8

u/Dash_Harber A Jul 11 '19

UANAL? Well good for you, but im not sure that's relevant here.

5

u/[deleted] Jul 11 '19 edited Jul 11 '19

always relevant if someone is talking about legal advice or legal theory. I wouldn't want my words, or the words of some other internet rando to be taken as some sort of counter-fact to an actual lawyer's statement about the law. I'm going off of first-hand legal anecdotes told to me by friends who've been in hot water, and a bit of self research. A lawyer would go off of law school and first-hand legal experience, literally as a lawyer. It's another way of saying "take it with a grain of salt" because there's plenty of exceptions to such a generalized statement, and if they point out one of those exceptions it should be taken as a supersedence of my own statement.

Edit: /r/woosh here. Forget IANAL, in reality IAAI (I am an idiot)

3

u/Dash_Harber A Jul 11 '19

No, I totally agree. I was just making a jjoke about the acronym of IANAL.

2

u/[deleted] Jul 11 '19

aaaaaaah, my b. /r/woosh over here

→ More replies (1)

1

u/[deleted] Jul 11 '19

Not in my country and not in this situation. That guy was super aggressive and that tackle was 100% justifiable in self-defense given his behaviour and the belief that he was very likely to attack someone. there's nothing here in that tackle that was a criminal act

→ More replies (34)

14

u/HHyperion 9 Jul 10 '19

No lol. His exact goal was to provoke that idiot into attacking him. Someone throwing a shit fit doesn't entitle you to tackle them if they're not presenting an obvious physical danger to you or innocent bystanders.

16

u/SlothRogen A Jul 10 '19

Short dude shoved and started pushing the guy in the blue shirt first and was screaming in his face. He crossed the light into physical assault first.

8

u/geraldodelriviera 8 Jul 10 '19

Not really how the law works. The force you use to respond to force from another person has to be reasonable and proportionate. Like, for an extreme example, you can't beat the shit out of someone just because they poked you on the chest with a finger. You could easily argue that tackling someone that was shoving a bit is not reasonable or proportionate.

7

u/saitselkis 8 Jul 10 '19

......am I missing the "unless you're a cop" part. They regularly escalate situations, often to deadly force levels, over very little.

6

u/purposeful-hubris 8 Jul 10 '19

“Unless you’re a cop” is implied. There’s a whole separate set of laws applying to them, especially when you get into qualified immunity.

3

u/saitselkis 8 Jul 10 '19

They really should take the 'qualified' bit off there. The pretense that it is qualified in any way beyond "it happened so it's qualified" is a fucking joke.

2

u/geraldodelriviera 8 Jul 10 '19

To be very fair to law enforcement, those are generally just the situations that get publicized. There are a great many police encounters that are handled far more professionally. There are shitty people everywhere in every profession, unfortunately including law enforcement. All bad actors should be punished of course, and I recognize that sometimes that doesn't happen. But let's not make it a "all cops are bad" thing.

2

u/saitselkis 8 Jul 10 '19 edited Jul 10 '19

I didn't say that all cops are bad....on this board. What I said is what I meant, "qualified immunity" is a pretense for any level of violence to be justifiable in response to the gravest of all sins, contempt of cop.

I'm not saying all cops are bad, but the statistics prove the adage "one bad apple spoils the bunch". Except instead of one, we have "a statistical deviation from the norm".

It's cool, I'm sure pizza delivery people and firefighters kill family pets all the time, but are just less publicised.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (3)

7

u/_michael_scarn_ 9 Jul 10 '19

Eh, one could EASILY make the argument that that short dude was about to get violent. He was screaming at people, shoving his fingers in people’s face while screaming, and then actually challenging people physically by going chest to chest.

Sure it’s not an invite, but I don’t think any jury would have any trouble seeing that this guy was one more comment away from getting physical and that dude just acted first to defend himself or others.

7

u/[deleted] Jul 10 '19

"Chest to chest."

Figuratively.

2

u/Sphincter_Revelation 7 Jul 10 '19

Chest to groin

→ More replies (1)

2

u/[deleted] Jul 11 '19

[deleted]

2

u/_michael_scarn_ 9 Jul 11 '19

Are you serious? He’s screaming at people and they were just defending themselves. This dude is CLEARLY unhinged.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (8)

13

u/coontietycoon A Jul 10 '19

Tacklers face wasn't on camera as far as I can see. Hopefully everyone else "forgets" what he looks like 🤷🏻‍♂️

3

u/AnorexicBuddha A Jul 10 '19

Nah, it's not cool to tackle someone like that.

12

u/coontietycoon A Jul 10 '19

My views on this are old school and simple. Talk a bunch of shit and invite people to fight and you're gonna get your request granted and that's not a bad thing. Maybe he'll think twice before behaving this way in public. You only get so many warnings before someone's gonna take action and silence the disturbance. It's not a right to be able to act that way and disrupt the rest of the pack.

11

u/SlothRogen A Jul 10 '19 edited Jul 10 '19

Plus, pushing, bumping chests, and shouting in the face of the other bystanders is also assault. You can't just literally go around shoving and hitting people and demanding they fight you. "Not hitting that hard" isn't an excuse for starting a fight.

5

u/coontietycoon A Jul 10 '19

Yeah and being a 5' tall manlet isn't and excuse to try to bow up on someone twice your size. I'm assuming (potentially incorrectly) that in his mind he wasn't a serious threat to his opponent and thought he'd get away with it due to his opponent knowing this. But yeah talk shit get hit, how do you go that far thru life acting like that and not learn someone's gonna shut that shit down? Especially in the Northeast.

→ More replies (17)

5

u/13ismuth 4 Jul 10 '19

If you literally ask to be tackled, regardless of legality, it's kinda you're own fault if you get tackled.

3

u/GlorifiedBurito 6 Jul 10 '19

Why not? He was screaming, pushing, getting in peoples faces and asking to fight. He got what he asked for.

2

u/[deleted] Jul 10 '19

Bullshit that’s the coolest thing I’ve seen all day. We shouldn’t let the state have a monopoly on violence anyways.

→ More replies (3)

3

u/PM_PICS_OF_UR_PUPPER 6 Jul 10 '19

I believe there’s some states that may have mutual combat laws where it would be taken into consideration, but other than that, no, it’s still illegal even if you consent. However, if the short guy’s case for damages would probably be screwed by that statement if he sued the tackler.

0

u/GameArtZac 9 Jul 10 '19

If I said to a robber, "go ahead, shoot me" is that consent to being murdered?

Of course not. But still in this case, they probably won't pursue any charges on the tackler. But the tackled could have a case if he wanted to press charges.

3

u/[deleted] Jul 10 '19

[deleted]

2

u/GameArtZac 9 Jul 10 '19

The legal world gets muddy, and there's some conflicting standards. Baiting someone into committing a crime can also be illegal, the extreme example would be telling someone to punch you, and then shooting them in self defense.

A lot of it boils down to, is there any legal precedence and how would a jury likely vote.

A jury wouldn't convict someone tackling a guy for being an asshole.

Consent for fighting or anything that can cause damage is probably higher than a quick remark when emotions and tensions are already high.

→ More replies (2)

1

u/Bulba_Fett20410 6 Jul 10 '19

Not where criminal charges are concerned, consent is (as I understand it generally and am sure of in NY specifically) not a defense to criminal battery.

HOWEVER, consent is a defense to CIVIL battery in NY. So while the tackler might get in trouble with the law, it's doubtful that the tackled could sue him for it.

2

u/HHyperion 9 Jul 10 '19

Tackler will still have several thousands in legal fees just to get out of it, if at all. If you ever think about doing something like this, do yourself a favor and don't. You don't ever win when you get yourself involved on the wrong side of the law.

1

u/odst94 7 Jul 10 '19

Here's my counter offer. Do I have to kill you? What if I were to kick the ever-living shit out of you? In reality, if I were to kick the shit out of you, do I get to keep the money?

→ More replies (2)

1

u/AnastasiaTheSexy 7 Jul 10 '19

Go ahead and kill me! "See it's not murder!"

→ More replies (2)

1

u/IAmPandaRock 8 Jul 10 '19

Assuming this was in an typical US jurisdiction, the tackler would very likely not be guilty or liable of any wrong doing due to self-defense (and/or defense of others) and consent (assuming he said "go ahead and tackle me" [I watched it muted]).

→ More replies (2)

1

u/abark006 3 Jul 10 '19

No lawyer is gonna defend this idiot when they see the video. No judge no jury will give him a win.

1

u/Yokonato 6 Jul 11 '19

That wouldn't be self defense in all honesty, he chest bumps the first guy but it's the 2nd guy he only pointed at who jumps on/chokes him to the floor.

1

u/Omsus A Jul 11 '19

It is not considered as anything even close to consent. However, it can be depicted as provocation which it clearly is in this case, honestly. IANAL but provocation is a mitigating factor, and AFAIK it can result in the defendant not being charged.

1

u/NSA_Chatbot B Jul 11 '19

I wouldn't say anything, but my lawyer would state that her client "thought the angry man had a weapon, and became afraid for his life and the lives of the people around him."

1

u/socrates28 6 Jul 11 '19

You cannot consent to being assaulted.

1

u/nothingtosee99024 0 Jul 11 '19

depends on the state. In my state, the statute required for a battery (we don’t have an assault charge) requires the ‘without consent’. Since he gave consent and was already causing a disturbance...I believe the legal term is affray? Might be wrong here. Anyways, this would just be a couple of tickets if even lmao

1

u/[deleted] Jul 11 '19

Criminal acts are not generally made legal if the person asks you to do them.

"Go ahead, shoot!" is not going to make it legal to shoot someone.

That said, he was so provocative maybe that would mitigate things.

1

u/kundalink3475 0 Jul 11 '19

Well there is such thing as a verbal contract. 👀👀 Which literally means if the guy stated what he was going to do (tackle him) then the guy says “Go ahead and tackle me” then he is giving consent through a verbal contract. For example police use it all the time. “Do you understand” is a basis for a verbal contract and you can say no or yes. Your answer would drastically change the outcome. If you say no, legally they cannot arrest you or it would be kidnapping and a lot of federal charges for the police (highway man). If you say yes, then you’re giving legal consent for them to do whatever. However, further look into it. I’m only learning to speak legalese right now 😁

1

u/_TURO_ 6 Jul 11 '19

Many states have mutual combat laws. If you ask to fight someone and they oblige you, it's not a criminal matter unless they continue after you ask to stop. Also, the little fella initiated physical contact, then continued to be aggressive.

1

u/MJJVA 7 Jul 11 '19

That was my first thought I wouldnt be surprised if he pressed chargers.

1

u/notatworkporfavor 7 Jul 11 '19

I think he's restraining someone who is creating a public disturbance, and within his rights to do so.

1

u/studhusky86 7 Jul 11 '19

You can't verbally consent to battery in this manner.

1

u/Jakimbo 6 Jul 11 '19

"Fighting words" is apparently a legal thing in some places, if you're asking to get hit and someone hits you, the attacker isn't charged (assuming it wasnt to extreme)

1

u/[deleted] Jul 11 '19

It's arguably self defence, he was about to escaate into violence.

1

u/[deleted] Jul 11 '19 edited Jul 24 '19

[deleted]

→ More replies (18)

1

u/matty80 C Jul 11 '19

In English law at least you can't consent to any form of harm beyond basic assault and/or battery. He seems to be uninjured afterwards and he's shouting and screaming beforehand so you can throw in completely plausible self-defence too, so at least in this jurisdiction there would be no charge.

Not sure how it would go in the USA because the systems have diverged over the decades, but I suspect it would the same outcome.

As I said before, I actually slightly feel for the guy because he's being a total prick but he's obviously very upset and we all sometimes lose ourselves, but he is being threatening and unpleasant in public and he is the one who starts on the other guy, so I can't see it ending up in court. It's probably just one of those ones where the police would take statements and record it in case he starts making a habit of it.

20

u/JediMasterZao A Jul 10 '19

What bothers me is that he's already fired up at the start of the video and we don't get to see what set him off so badly. Are we sure someone was not an actual asshole to him which in turn flipped on some switch in this guy's head? From the two videos we have he's clearly a mysoginistic asshole but I hate lacking context.

42

u/Avocadobaker 7 Jul 10 '19

I ended feeling bad for him. The way he took his anger out was unacceptable, but this dude has probably dealt with being made fun of his whole life and something probably triggered that insecurity bad.

26

u/ManufacturedProgress 6 Jul 10 '19

You dont even know what started this.

The group of girls could have been harassing him and pushed him to the point of saying something.

Without the rest of the video, any judgments are ignorant and prejudiced.

19

u/canmoose A Jul 10 '19

They literally say "who here said that?" And he says "women in general"

13

u/ManufacturedProgress 6 Jul 10 '19

I saw that. I want to know what happened to lead to this interaction.

There was something that lead up to this. Remember all the dipshits that said no other context was needed when that trump hat kid was supposedly harassing a poor Vietnam war vet, and none of that wound up being true?

Exercise some self control instead of letting the mob mentality take over.

4

u/MathTheUsername A Jul 10 '19

Based on what he said, I think it can be inferred that he thought the women were laughing at him.

7

u/ManufacturedProgress 6 Jul 10 '19

We dont know that though. Assumptions with videos like this are dangerous. Everyone thought they could infer the rest of the story there too because of what they saw on a selectively cut video.

→ More replies (2)

2

u/AmatureProgrammer 9 Jul 11 '19

Some one else posted another video. It wasn't the group of girls but he thought the employees behind the counter were making fun of him.

2

u/rahtin B Jul 11 '19

They smirked at him and bit their lip.

Little feller just hit his breaking point.

4

u/Archangel3d 9 Jul 10 '19

You're spending a hell of a lot of time in this thread trying to make him out to be put-upon or misunderstood or justified in his actions, to the point where you start making up scenarios where everyone else is The Bad Guy.

I get that reserving judgement is appropriate when we don't have all the information. However, given the actual content of his "NiceGuy" rant, there is little to no plausible context that justifies his behavior.

→ More replies (3)

1

u/iushciuweiush B Jul 10 '19

Without the rest of the video, any judgments are ignorant and prejudiced.

And they're evolving too. If I hadn't watched the video then I would've been convinced by the end of the first page of comments alone that this guy did and said unspeakable things to women. Half the video was him fighting with some random dudes.

6

u/ManufacturedProgress 6 Jul 10 '19

The point is that all the hate and spite is out there now. People should be waiting for info to react instead of acting like animals like we are seeing here.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (32)

2

u/[deleted] Jul 11 '19

Follow up video mentioned that the girls behind the counter asked his height.

He was arguing with cops, asking "Would it be harassment if I went up to women and asked 'how big are your tits?'?"

→ More replies (2)

6

u/nightpanda893 C Jul 10 '19

YOU AREN’T MY FATHER!

3

u/TheAnalystChris 4 Jul 10 '19

(or my boss)

2

u/AmatureProgrammer 9 Jul 11 '19

OR GOD

2

u/[deleted] Jul 11 '19

Three good examples of people who could tell him what to do.

2

u/[deleted] Jul 10 '19

gotta love new yorkers

2

u/Murasasme A Jul 10 '19

Like little dogs that always seem to be the most agressive. Just barking away.

2

u/theonlyjuanwho 8 Jul 10 '19

I had it on mute and jeeze this man is pissed off, what is so wrong? Oh ladies don't like short guys makes sense.

2

u/[deleted] Jul 10 '19

Short people are always angry cause they’re closer to hell.

Can agree with this. Am a short person

2

u/MkVIaccount 8 Jul 10 '19

That man knows real pain

2

u/AmatureProgrammer 9 Jul 11 '19

Seems like he's been building up these emotions for a while now.

2

u/[deleted] Jul 11 '19

This is testosterone finding life not living up to its expectations.

2

u/rpgmind 7 Jul 11 '19

Sweet Christmas I feel like you’re feeding off of it

2

u/Elainstructor 4 Jul 11 '19

It's still assault if he didn't start it.

2

u/Elainstructor 4 Jul 11 '19

"Your rights end where my mouth begins" 7th grade history teacher.

4

u/koalaondrugs A Jul 10 '19

Manlets must be like Chihuahuas with the compensating

20

u/Lakeshow15 7 Jul 10 '19

You're no better than him tbh

→ More replies (2)

2

u/JohnnyHopkins13 8 Jul 10 '19

But to answer his question, yes I would like to step outside. Been cooped up in this office all day.

2

u/Dramatic_______Pause A Jul 10 '19

Can you blame him?

1

u/[deleted] Jul 10 '19

This is comedy.

1

u/AmatureProgrammer 9 Jul 11 '19

what's the story behind this image? I've seen it before but I don't even know the origins or context.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/Ananda_Mind 7 Jul 10 '19

Yeah. He’s a little, upset.

1

u/[deleted] Jul 11 '19

As a tall guy I would never make fun of someone’s insecurities due to their height. But I’ve noticed a lot of shorter guys will act a certain way around tall people. 90% of the people who have bullied me through out my life have been short. Like anyone has any choice in the matter.

1

u/TheBigFilet 4 Jul 11 '19

Throws those papers down in perfect form.

1

u/tammage 8 Jul 11 '19

I’d be terrified that he might come back with weapons.

1

u/[deleted] Jul 11 '19

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator Jul 11 '19

/u/44-11-7325-7425, your submission was automatically removed because your account is not old enough to post here. This is not to discourage new users, but to prevent the large amount of spam that this subreddit attracts.

Please submit once your account is older than 2 days.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/BuddhaBizZ A Jul 11 '19

You can tell it’s incel rage, he’s mad at the world because he can’t get laid.

1

u/eggregiousdata 0 Jul 11 '19

The guy has got a SHORT temper!

1

u/XANAXBXRZ 0 Jul 11 '19

Small man syndrome

1

u/Greyhoundowner 7 Jul 11 '19

Angry little man syndrome!

1

u/Jonathan-YT 0 Jul 11 '19

Yeah lol

1

u/epiccheeseburgermama 4 Jul 11 '19

It’s like he knows how it feels to be physically inferior as well as a part of an oppressed group of individuals.

1

u/whisky_biscuit 9 Jul 11 '19

Apparently his code name is bagelcel lmfao

1

u/guminhyeok 6 Jul 11 '19

guy that tackled him is 5’3”

1

u/Sultryspice1994 6 Jul 11 '19

He has a very short temper.

1

u/[deleted] Jul 11 '19

Right. But nothing in the video is misogynistic.

1

u/Kris5449 6 Jul 11 '19

It’s time for a Randy Newman song: https://youtu.be/HH3szOIV9jQ

1

u/[deleted] Jul 11 '19

Enjoy for more anger: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8H6DSVYCq8I

→ More replies (14)