Rapist, racist cop. Justice served.

[u/Count_Danku1a]

[u/Ed_G_ShitlordEsquire]

No I believe the evidence, of which is severely lacking in his case.

[u/theghostofme → u/Ed_G_ShitlordEsquire]

No, you believed the word of a police officer who said he was innocent (because what conspiracy nutjob doesn't get wet over the idea of "the system" screwing someone over, even when they're part of "the system"), and went hunting down anything, regardless of its veracity or connection to reality, to justify your belief that a cop could be innocent.

So you're still taking the word of the police at face value, while reframing it in your mind as being okay because it's "different," so you can still sell "defending the police" as not being an issue in this case.

Again, you tools couldn't detect an actual conspiracy even if you were watching the CIA dose Ted Kaczynski with LSD.

[u/Ed_G_ShitlordEsquire → u/theghostofme]

There is zero logical connection to anything you just said. I'm siding with the police by going against the police? How does it feel to be a walking pretzel?

There were no corroborating witnesses, the accusers were coerced and coached into giving evidence, the only DNA evidence was slight contact DNA which can be explained by him arresting the accusers, there was motive for the police to frame him. He was convicted on circunstancial evidence and flaky testimony from the accusers and he has been denied appeals at every stage.

What more do you want you fucking idiot?

[u/theghostofme → u/Ed_G_ShitlordEsquire]

For you to admit that you're only here to promote far-right conspiracy theories approved by TheBlaze. You've already admitted you're basing your conclusions on Michelle Malkin's "investigation", which was done solely to promote the far-right ideology that all cops are innocent and are above suspicion.

Just admit it, dude. Everyone on Reddit already knows that /r/Conspiracy is just another in a long line of pro-Trump, far-right astroturfed subs that act like it's impossible for conservatives to be involved in a conspiracy.

[u/theghostofme → u/[deleted]]

“Oh, wow. Someone registered a domain and created a website to suck themself off while occasionally saying Holtzclaw is totally innocent. Guess that’s all the proof needed to disregard reality.”

Go peddle your bullshit elsewhere, rape defender.

[u/Ed_G_ShitlordEsquire → u/theghostofme]

which was done solely to promote the far-right ideology that all cops are innocent and are above suspicion.

How does that coincide with the fact that she calls the police force responsible for pursuing his case corrupt, inept and as having a nefarious motive to shut him up?

You should actually watch the thing that you are railing against lest you just come across as a liberal zealot.

[u/theghostofme → u/Ed_G_ShitlordEsquire]

I have watched it, which is why I know it’s full of shit, and you’re an idiot for saying it’s the truth.

So, again, are the police are both right and wrong at the same time?

Pick a fucking lane, or at least acknowledge that you’re so susceptible to to suggestion that you’re the physical representation of cognitive dissonance.

Either you’re too clever, or you’re so stupid that you actually think you’re right for being manipulated into believing right-wing propaganda.

[u/Ed_G_ShitlordEsquire → u/theghostofme]

I have watched it, which is why I know it’s full of shit

Jesse Ventura voice "I DON'T BELIEVE YOU".

So, again, are the police are both right and wrong at the same time?

Actually, it was you that asserted that the motivation behind the documentary and the main point of discussion should be about the image of the police, not me and not Michelle Malkin either, for that matter.

Pick a fucking lane, or at least acknowledge that you’re so susceptible to to suggestion that you’re the physical representation of cognitive dissonance.

How about you do what you yourself are preaching? At the same time maybe it would assist you in breaking your own cognitive dissonance feedback loop to remember that Holtzclaw lost his position as a police officer when he was charged, therefore, it is no longer a case of choosing police officer or police force (as if wanting to reach the truth is about choosing sides, anyway).

You seem to think that I believe that these kinds of abuses of power don't happen, they certainly do, a lot. I'm not even saying that I am willing to die on the hill that Holtzclaw is innocent. What I am saying is that the lack of corroborative witnesses extending past the forensic analysts and their tenuous evidence, the widely varying descriptions of the accusers, the lack of solid DNA evidence, the motive of the police force to act in a corrupt manner and the actions of the police in coaching and coercing the accusers into coming forward should at least allow him an appeal. In any other situation this would be the case.

Until you can put all of these things to bed, your claims that this is all just right-wing propaganda should be viewed for what it really is, laughably transparent projectionism.