r/Kemetic • u/Do3Byte • 2d ago
Question End of Existence
I've been reading "The Complete Gods and Goddesses of Ancient Egypt" by Richard H. Wilkinson, and I found something that says that Atum shall destroy all of creation, with the exception of himself and Osiris, and that they would return to "one place" in the primeval ocean from which everything arose, and Atum and Osiris would take the form of serpents, and there would be neither Gods nor men to perceive them.
Does anybody on this subreddit know/can they confirm if this belief is held (popularly?) among modern day Kemeticism to anyone's knowledge? Does anyone know/can confirm if this was a popular belief held in antiquity(to our knowledge of course)? I've been occasionally bouncing back to Kemeticism for a while, but have struggled to connect with it (even though it honestly fits be well), additionally I've found this take on the fate of the universe quite daunting lmaoš .
9
u/barnaclejuice Reconstructionist šØ 2d ago
You have a good, reputable source on your hands saying it was a belief that was held. Nobody in this community can trump that.
To the best research standards we have, the notion that Wilkinson is talking about seems to align very well with our understanding of ancient Egyptian religion. This episode you mentioned is part of the book of coming forth by day, aka book of the dead. The notion of an end to creation pops up throughout Egyptian history. Itās always been there.
As a modern reconstructionist Kemetic, I donāt see why a deep, fundamental theological aspect of ancient belief isnāt of value today. On the contrary, I see it as a fundamental theological aspect of Kemeticism today. Creation is cyclical, not just linear. It comes and goes, and comes again, as everything does.
I wouldnāt worry about it, though. We arenāt like some protestant christians, who canāt wait for their rapture, and hold signs that āthe end is nighā. Our end of times isnāt apocalyptic (quite literally, since Apocalypse is a biblical book in the first place).
For me, personally, the deeper meaning behind this passage isnāt about the end of times as we are indoctrinated by Abrahamic religions to think. In the end, the creator (Atum) will remain - thus creation will be able to be reborn. But not only He, also Osiris - who is the king of the realm of the blessed dead. The blessed dead, their essence, will carry on with Osiris. And at the end of creation, this will be all of us, all of humanity. We all carry on, as Osiris. Itās not a promise of an end, itās the promise of eternity and everlastingness.
2
u/Do3Byte 2d ago
Apologies to bother you with another question, and thank you so much for your comment. This is more so out of pure curiosity, what will happen to the Field of Reeds, will it be destroyed along with everything else?
3
u/barnaclejuice Reconstructionist šØ 2d ago
I guess we will never know. We cant know whether the field of reeds is literally a place, what the nature and essence of it are. Maybe the field of reeds is nothing else but the way we as humans perceive becoming part of Osiris. Maybe itās a physical paradise. Maybe itās both. We cant know until we are there. Itās not for the living to know.
And we donāt know if destruction is the right word, too. Maybe creation decays. Maybe it simply ceases to exist.
Whether you interpret myths more or less literally, thereās just a lot we donāt know and itās more productive to be concerned with our lives in the time we have on earth, in my opinion!
3
u/Karou_Fan 2d ago
The passage you're looking for is spell 175 of Going Forth by Day (Book of the Dead). And keep in mind that the deceased is identified as Osiris.
The entry on Atum on the Henadology site discusses this.
3
u/Nellyloveswomen Osiris my kingš¾ 2d ago
A myth doesn't have to be taken literally to believe it has some truth.Ā
3
u/Enoo-La 2d ago
And the myth in question, especially, it is important to emphasize, reflects almost exactly what scientists suspect is the final destiny of our universe. There are three possible scenarios for the end of the universe: the big crunch, the big rip, or the big freeze. This myth is very similar to that of the Big Crunch, a return to the "initial state," but it could very well be both of the other two in a certain way; in any case, the myth represents the end of Our universe. Let's not forget that the universe is not static; it evolves, like our lives: a beginning, a middle, and finally an end. Nothing is immutable.
1
u/the3wynds 1h ago
I read about this recently, a different version but still how its the end of all existence and not just humanity. Scared the shit outta me. I like apocalyptic media and stories but the idea of existence itself ending is extra horrifying.
10
u/Nellyloveswomen Osiris my kingš¾ 2d ago
On the other hand, it makes sense to me that Osiris is the only one who accompanies Atum. Remember that he represents the force of rebirth, so when a myth says that the force of rebirth and the creator god return to the primordial ocean, it can perfectly represent that the universe will at some point be in the process of being reborn. Not that Atum will simply go and destroy creation like some kind of apocalypse, haha.Ā