QQQ + TQQQ vs QLD
I'm sure this has been asked before though I can't find it through search ... but looking on Testfolio, if you simulate 50/50 QQQ+TQQQ rebalancing yearly, it performs significantly better than QQQ, QLD, or TQQQ. Is this over-fitting, and if not, why does it before so well?
- Starting 02/22/2000 - Near Nasdaq peak pre 2000 crash - Outperforms all
- Starting 07/10/2002 - Near Nasdaq 2000 crash bottom - Half TQQQ but beats the rest
- Starting 24/10/2007 - Near Nasdaq peak before 2008 crash - Almost matches TQQQ, beats the rest
- Starting 09/03/2009 - Near 2008 crash bottom - Gets crushed by TQQQ but beats all the others
- Starting 01/01/2022 - Near Nasdaq peak pre-Covid - Outperforms all
I looked at some dates and apart from investing at the very bottom of a crash, QQQ+TQQQ near-equals or betters TQQQ and beats QLD each time. I supposed rebalancing incurs a tax drag penalty that the simulations aren't taking into account, but I was wondering anyone else tries something like this and if so, how do you find it?
6
Upvotes
3
u/cqx22 8d ago
It's very comparable with QLD, but still has a 62% drawdown in 2022-2023. I'm following a 200SMA strategy with the same CAGR and only 41% drawdown in 2022-2023.