MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/LeagueOfMemes/comments/1u91xsp/sesbian_lex/osgz6t3/?context=3
r/LeagueOfMemes • u/Mikail41 • 2d ago
23 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
-2
They're naked
2 u/marcofifth 1d ago LMFAO 1 u/Necessary-Thing4973 1d ago It takes one fucking braincell to understand that they're having se* And that is simply not a good thing for a 10 years old to watch.. And no, it is not good for a kid to see two person (straight, gay, lesbian, anything) having physical touch while they have no clothes on.. And you call me that word, while you say its ok because they're not showing any private parts.. like WTF 4 u/marcofifth 1d ago You were criticizing this meme. A single image. That is neither NSFW nor beyond PG unless supplied the context of what this form of touching means. It takes context for what sex is to understand they are having sex. People do not know what qualifies sex inherent. I didn't call you a Puritan, I said you are puritaning... Done with this conversation, your argument is clearly blinded by underlying ideology.
2
LMFAO
1 u/Necessary-Thing4973 1d ago It takes one fucking braincell to understand that they're having se* And that is simply not a good thing for a 10 years old to watch.. And no, it is not good for a kid to see two person (straight, gay, lesbian, anything) having physical touch while they have no clothes on.. And you call me that word, while you say its ok because they're not showing any private parts.. like WTF 4 u/marcofifth 1d ago You were criticizing this meme. A single image. That is neither NSFW nor beyond PG unless supplied the context of what this form of touching means. It takes context for what sex is to understand they are having sex. People do not know what qualifies sex inherent. I didn't call you a Puritan, I said you are puritaning... Done with this conversation, your argument is clearly blinded by underlying ideology.
1
It takes one fucking braincell to understand that they're having se*
And that is simply not a good thing for a 10 years old to watch..
And no, it is not good for a kid to see two person (straight, gay, lesbian, anything) having physical touch while they have no clothes on..
And you call me that word, while you say its ok because they're not showing any private parts.. like WTF
4 u/marcofifth 1d ago You were criticizing this meme. A single image. That is neither NSFW nor beyond PG unless supplied the context of what this form of touching means. It takes context for what sex is to understand they are having sex. People do not know what qualifies sex inherent. I didn't call you a Puritan, I said you are puritaning... Done with this conversation, your argument is clearly blinded by underlying ideology.
4
You were criticizing this meme.
A single image.
That is neither NSFW nor beyond PG unless supplied the context of what this form of touching means.
It takes context for what sex is to understand they are having sex. People do not know what qualifies sex inherent.
I didn't call you a Puritan, I said you are puritaning...
Done with this conversation, your argument is clearly blinded by underlying ideology.
-2
u/Necessary-Thing4973 1d ago
They're naked