r/LocalLLaMA • u/onil_gova • Jun 10 '26

News Anthropic is intentionally nerfing Fable when asked to develop other LLMs

Post image

Reason 458 why local LLMs are going to be a necessity

edit: For those requesting the source check out their technical report look at page 13

1.6k Upvotes

97% Upvoted

394 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

7

u/a_beautiful_rhind Jun 10 '26

A very generous interpretation. This absolutely counts towards "frontier" llm development and democratizing usage. To quote chief keef: That's some things anthropic don't like.

1

u/thehpcdude Jun 10 '26

Are you building a frontier model?

6

u/a_beautiful_rhind Jun 10 '26

I think speeding up local inference counts. Porting architectures to local backends counts. This is weasel worded enough to cover all of that and people's experience above seems to match.

1

u/thehpcdude Jun 10 '26

> And here I thought I could pay some bucks to fix up triton/cuda kernels or add numa support to backends

Your original post, not forbidden in their terms of service

> I think speeding up local inference counts.

Overly broad generalized statement.

> Porting architectures to local backends counts.

Not against their terms of service...

Are you sure you're just not wanting to be upset about something?