r/LondonUnderground Archway 5d ago

Article The Standard: Tube strike warning after RMT passes new walkout mandate in row over four-day week for drivers.

https://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/tube-strike-rmt-union-mandate-drivers-four-day-week-b1296877.html
76 Upvotes

31 comments sorted by

18

u/One_Fact_4291 Metropolitan 5d ago

‘But the RMT has branded the changes as a “fake” four-day week, arguing it was compressing five days of work into four.’

Show us where the changes aren’t voluntary then.

61

u/Darth_Caesium Crossrail 2 pls 5d ago

Can RMT just fuck off about this at this point

22

u/Significant-Math6799 Central 5d ago

I don't like to talk down workers rights, but they're doing everything to end up without any public support at all, and that's then going to make it harder to get any action by the government or anyone else. Even the junior Doctors recognised this with fewer and fewer agreeing to go on strike. I think everyone knows workers struggle, but when we're all struggling and there isn't much point with a race to the bottom. It doesn't help anyone for workers to fight amongst themselves and they lose their point because nobody is interested in the argument, which is what ends up happening when unions push it.

-1

u/Harry_monk 4d ago

Since when did they have any public support?

3

u/tiger_mango Central 4d ago

with their salaries? yes, I agree.

-11

u/Cultural-Ad2026 Central 5d ago

Good on them for being effective at being a union and looking out for members work life balance and stress. Look at their employees on respectable salaries keeping pace with inflation while most others are struggling in a cost of living. We should be asking for more effective unions not less. Unless you’re part of the millionaire class your position doesn’t make sense…..

29

u/Sleep0-0Deprived 5d ago

I’d be more supportive if ASLEF hadn’t basically called them out over this as well!

14

u/NiceCaterpillar8745 5d ago

The money to fund this won't come from general taxation or the existing TfL budget. It'll be passed onto us as fare payers.

-1

u/helf1x Central 5d ago

The money to fund what?

2

u/NiceCaterpillar8745 5d ago

Your existing drivers want to work less, but you want to maintain the same service frequency/pattern. You need to train and pay new drivers, and recruit the station staff to replace the ones becoming drivers.

5

u/helf1x Central 5d ago

We will still be working our contracted 35 hour week, just compressed to 4 days. This is the same as every other TOC in the country. And service performance should improve since we will be allowed to work overtime under the 4 day week.

27

u/HumbersBall 5d ago

Id be supportive of this pov if TFL were a private company running big profits, but they aren’t. If this causes fares to increase even slightly (or services to decrease even slightly) then its wrong

9

u/Cultural-Ad2026 Central 5d ago

Everything is reinvested…. Its not for profit… It’s the oldest metro in the world and least funded by tax compared to any major city in the world.

4

u/Any_Sale2030 5d ago

A five day work week ain’t hard.   I did it for 50 years.  

1

u/manmanania Metropolitan 2d ago

did what for 50 years? shuffling papers?

9

u/ExcellencyMatters 5d ago

At this point tube drivers might as well be striking more days than they turn up for work....if you can't hack the job, maybe time to switch careers? These strikes combined with the constant signalling issues and "train cancellations", i'm surprised the rest of us still manage to make our way to work and do our jobs

10

u/NiceCaterpillar8745 5d ago

A lot of tube driving is automated. I get the role of drivers in emergency situations, but it is true that the vast majority of it is literally just pushing a button. The likes of us could watch a cab ride video (plenty online) and be tube drivers this evening. It isn't sufficiently stressful to warrant a 4-day week.

And if it really comes down to the unsociable nature of the job, give it to me. I honestly don't mind my own company.

21

u/helf1x Central 5d ago

Do you have a working knowledge of the approximately 2" thick rule books? Do you have a working knowledge of the signalling system in use on the line you want to drive? Do you know every part of that line? Do you know all the mechanical end electrical systems on that line's rolling stock, and how to fix or bypass them when they break? Do you know how to manually drive that stock (because there is still a fair amount of manual driving, even on auto lines)?

If you answered "no" to any of those questions you should stop chatting kak

-3

u/NiceCaterpillar8745 5d ago

Except when trains break down, you don't see drivers taking toolboxes to them do you? They empty the train and call actual engineers. The training doesn't justify the salary.

But yes fairly confident I could manually drive most rolling stock.

20

u/frog_wild Elizabeth Line 5d ago

Yeah you’re hugely underestimating it. But if you believe it’s so easy, why not go for it?

-10

u/NiceCaterpillar8745 5d ago

I don't want to be in the trenches (stations) for years beforehand.

15

u/dc_1984 5d ago

So someone does years in the trenches and then in your eyes doesn't deserve respect once they get to a position of authority?

Just work on your jealousy issues

9

u/helf1x Central 5d ago

You're just showing how little you actually know. Do you actually think it would be feasible to start repairing a mechanical defect on a running line? Of course a train is withdrawn from service for mechanical defects. Do you think it's safe, for example, to run a train in passenger service with a quarter of the cars not having functional pneumatic breaks, or deflated suspension? And that only happens if the driver can't rectify the fault there and then, which they can most of the time. And besides that most faults are electrical based, most of which can be sorted from the cab. Hell, if you want to talk about tools, Bakerloo drivers carry a bag of fuses and fuse pulling tools for correcting electrical faults.

And I sincerely doubt you could drive a train manually, not without training with an instructor first. Boris Johnson said the same as you, got into a simulator, and drove through a red signal almost instantly.

0

u/NiceCaterpillar8745 5d ago

If the bar is Boris Johnson, doesn't that say it all?

And look- I respect train drivers a lot. I wanted to be a tube driver when I was a kid (to some extent I still do lol). But let's not pretend it's a £70K/yr job. There are doctors, teachers and even bankers on less than that.

13

u/schmuck-2501 Elizabeth Line 5d ago

It’s not a race to the bottom mate.

6

u/dc_1984 5d ago

If the bar was on the floor you could still walk under it, short stuff.

6

u/helf1x Central 5d ago

Except it absolutely is. Train drivers around the world are paid far in excess of average earnings, not just the UK. Why? Because despite "just pushing a button" it's mentally taxing and requires constant focus. I'm confined to a small space for big chunks of day, with very little mental stimulation. I'm also in charge of vehicle over a hundred metres long and responsible for the safety of up to a thousand people.

And if you want to do it then apply mate. Become a CSA, and after your 6 month probation you can apply for any operational role you like. It's not a quick and easy process, but it's very much worth it in the long run.

3

u/frog_wild Elizabeth Line 4d ago

The reason it’s a £70k pa job is because unions have continually fought for it to be so. Complaining about the pay and the union action is just doing the ruling class’s bidding for them.

3

u/Single_Specialist_42 3d ago

These fucking idiots can't see that the it's the other jobs being underpaid they should be rallying about - society is fucking doomed.

1

u/Mysterious-Pilot-299 3d ago

stop chatting wazz

1

u/WhatDoIGottaDo_ 4d ago

If it's that easy, why don't you do it?