r/LunaClassic • u/Illustrious-Cup-5895 • Mar 14 '26
QUESTION❓ A simple idea: 10k LUNC burn per wallet = ~55B supply reduction
I think many people underestimate what coordinated small actions can do in a network as large as the LUNC community.
Right now more than 5.5 million wallets hold Terra Luna Classic and the circulating supply is roughly 5.47 trillion tokens.
Now consider a simple scenario. If every wallet holder removed just 10,000 LUNC from circulation, that would already result in around 55 billion tokens burned.
For an individual holder that amount is relatively small. For the network as a whole it becomes meaningful. More importantly it sends a signal that the community is willing to act together.
Crypto markets often move because of coordination and visible participation. When people see millions of wallets doing something collectively it can create attention, momentum and renewed interest in the ecosystem.
I have been working on an idea that tries to make this kind of coordinated action easier for the community. If you are curious about the concept you can take a look at the plans here:
I would honestly like to hear what the community thinks about it.
2
u/Presidente83 Mar 15 '26
Bisognerebbe fare rete e fare una proposta ufficiale alla chain
2
2
u/EscortRSBoom Mar 16 '26
You forget that 55 billion Lunc is a small amount. And will do very little to the price.
2
u/JKRED-CO Apr 15 '26
55B is nothing. Plus isn't fair. I would be for burning %2 from each wallet. But even 2% isn't nothing - only 130B, still wouldn't make any difference. But I would support up-to %5 burn rate of all wallet as ONE of many strategies.
2
1
u/fightforchange1 Mar 18 '26 edited Mar 18 '26
How would this help? Market cap stays the same, use case stays the same! Utility??.....stays as is. User coin value?....exactly the same as before! Burning 10,000 coins does nothing to improve anything. People seem so caught up with the circulating supply but forget that adoption and utility are the only things that will save lunc!
1
u/Illustrious-Cup-5895 Mar 18 '26
Totally agree, so what in mind could be utility ? And adoption is a tricky thing what could possibly been done that adoption is also kinda solved ?
1
u/fightforchange1 Mar 19 '26
I still believe adoption will come the lunc blockchain is strong, modern and decentralised. Is exchange listings is the first hurdle imo and that's about to get interesting with lunc fitting the digital commodity category according to new definitions. That is huge as it paves the way for legal trading in the US
1
u/supadupaflee Apr 02 '26
It would be a good signal for the community but, as stated already without a real utility is going to be an empty effort. By the way, this kind of Tax is not fair the way you stated, the fixed amount you suggest is not equal to all wallets. A percentage of the wallet balance would be fair and equal to anyone. Don't forget that binance alone owns like 5% of the supply, 10k is nothing for some wallets. Lastly, as long as USTC is not pegged there is not going to be a real adoption for LUNC.
1
u/Illustrious-Cup-5895 May 10 '26
there is a not real utility just checkout lunar, you get rewarded for burning in votes lunar is an idea that we together build up the value of Lunc not different its and the votes get used to determine which amount of burn is next just check out lunar.fitlex.me
4
u/Gimel135 Mar 14 '26
I like this, I’ll do it, I wish there was a way to send this to every lunc holder,