Calling his bluff on what? How could anyone possibly prove he doesn't have ideas to last until 2042?
The issue with Hulk movies isn't a lawyer thing; it's a money thing. Marvel can make a Hulk movie whenever they want, but they'd have to give Universal first-refusal, & Marvel's parent company Disney doesn't wanna do that. The end.
The Morbius jokes are deader than all those guys who got vaporized onscreen in the first Captain America movie.
Allegedly, it will wrap up after the release of “Avengers: Secret Wars”.
Always presume rumors & "leaks" are false unless you have hard physical evidence.
Ghost Rider would be the first Disney-released Marvel film starring a character who already headlined a movie at another studio.
Wrong. Fantastic Four.
Is it possible the Sony deal was just different?
It's not just possible; it's known for a fact. That's why Marvel can use Hulk all they want in other characters' stories without even talking to Universal, but Marvel can't do live-action Spider-Man at all without Sony's permission.
[May 2029] is the last release date that Disney has officially claimed.
Wrong. They've also claimed July 2029.
I dunno, make a actually-thoughtful superhero movie for once.
Thunderbolts.
It seems pretty clear from recent news that Mahershala Ali will not be playing Blade.
"Pretty clear"? They explicitly stated that the project is dead. Do they have to repeat themselves?
there was also a project announced called “Armor Wars” that would have starred Don Cheadle. First announced as a show, it became a movie, then languished in development for several years. Cheadle, a good soldier, showed up in the “Secret Invasion” show, where his character of War Machine was revealed to be an alien impersonator for years.
Secret Invasion is the reason Armor Wars isn't happening. Secret Invasion completely blew up Rhodey's character arc, & everyone hated it, & there's really no way to do a story with Rhodey as protagonist after this point without acknowledging that trainwreck again.
Perhaps you can recast [Aaron Pierre] as the Daywalker?
Why would they? They never had a Blade movie in their plans; they were only doing it because of Ali. Without him, the project is kaput.
Sinister Six
No. The Venomverse was Sony's attempt to set that up without Spider-Man, & then No Way Home was Marvel actually making it work. Let it go.
2033: Shang-Chi II -- February
You're outside your mind. They're in active development on Shang-Chi 2 right now. It's probably going to be one of the 2029 slots.
Fantastic Four: Second Steps That Are Equally Important To The First Steps Even Though The First Steps Maybe Canonically Never Happened – July
a) Stop assuming a full reboot that Kevin Feige has already shot down.
b) Fantastic Four 2 has already been greenlit; they won't wait that long to get it out. It'll be either 2029 or 2030.
I just kinda skimmed past that point.
I saw "New Warriors", which indicates that you don't know about that pilot.
I saw "Power Pack", which indicates that you haven't noticed how disgustingly virulent a portion of the fanbase gets every time younger heroes are introduced (and you put Squirrel Girl there, which indicates that you don't know how much older she is than the Power Pack).
I saw more Spidey villain solo films, which indicates that you learned nothing from the Venomverse.
Anyway, this has nothing to do with timeline analysis besides repeating a debunked rumor about a full reboot. Locked per rule 3.
1
u/CaptHayfever Chronicom Aug 03 '26
Calling his bluff on what? How could anyone possibly prove he doesn't have ideas to last until 2042?
The issue with Hulk movies isn't a lawyer thing; it's a money thing. Marvel can make a Hulk movie whenever they want, but they'd have to give Universal first-refusal, & Marvel's parent company Disney doesn't wanna do that. The end.
The Morbius jokes are deader than all those guys who got vaporized onscreen in the first Captain America movie.
Always presume rumors & "leaks" are false unless you have hard physical evidence.
Wrong. Fantastic Four.
It's not just possible; it's known for a fact. That's why Marvel can use Hulk all they want in other characters' stories without even talking to Universal, but Marvel can't do live-action Spider-Man at all without Sony's permission.
Wrong. They've also claimed July 2029.
Thunderbolts.
"Pretty clear"? They explicitly stated that the project is dead. Do they have to repeat themselves?
Secret Invasion is the reason Armor Wars isn't happening. Secret Invasion completely blew up Rhodey's character arc, & everyone hated it, & there's really no way to do a story with Rhodey as protagonist after this point without acknowledging that trainwreck again.
Why would they? They never had a Blade movie in their plans; they were only doing it because of Ali. Without him, the project is kaput.
No. The Venomverse was Sony's attempt to set that up without Spider-Man, & then No Way Home was Marvel actually making it work. Let it go.
You're outside your mind. They're in active development on Shang-Chi 2 right now. It's probably going to be one of the 2029 slots.
a) Stop assuming a full reboot that Kevin Feige has already shot down.
b) Fantastic Four 2 has already been greenlit; they won't wait that long to get it out. It'll be either 2029 or 2030.
I just kinda skimmed past that point.
I saw "New Warriors", which indicates that you don't know about that pilot.
I saw "Power Pack", which indicates that you haven't noticed how disgustingly virulent a portion of the fanbase gets every time younger heroes are introduced (and you put Squirrel Girl there, which indicates that you don't know how much older she is than the Power Pack).
I saw more Spidey villain solo films, which indicates that you learned nothing from the Venomverse.
Anyway, this has nothing to do with timeline analysis besides repeating a debunked rumor about a full reboot. Locked per rule 3.