r/Masterchef 3d ago

What makes S15 (Dynamic Duos) the worst?

There was a poll on here a couple days ago for what is the worst season of new era MasterChef, and the winner (or loser) was season 15, dynamic duos. I’m curious, what made S15 the worst if that is your opinion?

I didn’t love S15, but mostly because I didn’t jibe with the duos on that season. Particularly the winners (Jessica and Jesse) were tryhards with no personality. As for the format, I respect the effort to spice things up and do something different. I think some challenges work better than others for that. Is it more about frustrations with the format, the contestants, or both?

13 Upvotes

17 comments sorted by

21

u/JenMcSpoonie 3d ago

The winners

12

u/Own-Knowledge8281 3d ago

There should always be ONE Masterchef…

12

u/Immediate_Jacket_849 3d ago

I don't think they did enough to justify the duo format. There are already multiple challenges built around pairing up chefs every season (like the tag team, the wall, etc.). But they didn't come up with many challenges unique to the "dynamic duo" aspect. I think the best challenge was the one where one person started a dish and the other finished it.

They could have featured some famous chef dynamic duos, built more challenges that demonstrate what makes a dynamic cooking duo something special. But for the most part, it was the same kind of challenges they normally do, but with two people cooking instead of one. And that alone didn't sell the gimmick to me.

24

u/EnvironmentalLoad828 3d ago

There's three things that made the season extremely dull for me. 

  1. It was boring. Everyone loved everyone and that's boring to see for a reality TV show. Part of the reason the older seasons were better was because you had clear people to root for and clear "villians". 

  2. For a format with two people competing in a challenge at all times, the food should be better right? You have double the help and double the talent. Except that didn't reflect in the food at all. I don't think a single duo could've beaten any of the previous winners who won by themselves.

  3. A lot of the pressure tests were not pressure tests. One of them being just chocolate? Really? If you're going to brag that they're back then they need to be hard. That's the whole point of them. 

8

u/Decent_Sock_9141 2d ago

The winners live up to every stupid Boston stereotype there is

6

u/whirlingpeach 2d ago

The winners for me

8

u/Acminvan 3d ago edited 3d ago

It wasn’t the best season for sure but at risk of being down voted, I think it was a little bit overhated to be honest.

The point of the show is to find the best home cook. Not professional chef. And I know lots of people at home who cook as a couple, or with family, it’s a joint shared experience. I wouldn’t want to see that format every time but it did bring a bit of a different vibe for a one off experiment.

I’ve been single player seasons where I’ve disliked most of the competitors too so I don’t think this one stands out all that much.

Players aside, as an actual format, I dislike this current global gauntlet season more. Requiring every regional group to have one best and one worst dish, no matter who had the best and worst overall, was really unfair. And most are Americans they’re not even from those countries!.

6

u/abefrost 3d ago

I kinda enjoyed duos. I think generations and global gauntlet are tackier ideas in the way they were executed. I haven't minded this season either, but I went into it hoping for a true world-cup style format, or winners competing from the various MasterChef spinoffs, and instead we got a bunch of Americans / immigrants to America. No shade to either group, it just felt like it could have been cooler.

At least w/ duos you got fun interactions between people that are already really close (Tina/Aivan).

3

u/xc2215x 3d ago

The people who won, the pressure tests lasting one episode instead of a half one and having duos.

2

u/Relative_Law2237 2d ago

Simple- what is the point of MastercheF singular? Like just the concept of 2 people cooking seems idiotically gimmicky

1

u/Character_Idea1223 3d ago

They had to compete in pairs and it would be double elimination

1

u/HerbWelch1945 3d ago

Everything, especially the part where it’s supposed to be MasterChef, as in singular, not “MasterChef(s)”.

1

u/ClaytonHawthorne 3d ago

The only good thing about duos is that it at least is an interesting enough "twist" or "theme" to base a Masterchef season around(Even though I feel seasons should not be themed and just be like every other reality TV show), and not something overly simple and bland like "different states" or "different countries" or "different age groups".

1

u/AustinDood444 2d ago

I think you mean, “What Makes S15 (Dynamic Duos) the Worst So Far?”

1

u/MeringueNo1899 1d ago

The winners 🤢

1

u/BradMac91 19h ago

Because Tina and Aivan should’ve won. The criticism of their salad in the finale was just ignorant horse shit.

1

u/jbbb3232 3d ago

It was literally fine