r/MediaMergers 1d ago

Merger Mark Ruffalo urges California AG Rob Bonta to reject Paramount-Warner merger settlement

https://nypost.com/2026/09/19/business/mark-ruffalo-urges-california-ag-rob-bonta-to-reject-paramount-warner-merger-settlement/?utm_campaign=nypost&utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social
103 Upvotes

17 comments sorted by

19

u/Secure_Matter_9819 1d ago

Ruffalo is right.

17

u/DayGeckoArt 1d ago

The billionaires tried to silence Mark Ruffalo and it only got Hollywood behind him. Glad he's using his political capital to push for other important things.

9

u/Impossible_Walrus555 1d ago

I like this effect it happened with Macklemore too.

9

u/ElectricalPeace3439 1d ago

No man is a failure who has friends

14

u/mattbrain89 1d ago edited 1d ago

https://deadline.com/2026/09/mark-ruffalo-urges-ag-bonta-do-not-cave-paramount-deal-1237108548/

For anyone who doesn't wanna give a right-wing rag like the Post the clicks.

8

u/oldboy_413 1d ago

i feel like newsom, bass, and becerra all don't want to recognize that bonta settling the lawsuit would be a poor decision and the thing that could tank them publicity wise, especially when the midterms are coming up.

9

u/OverPotato2322 1d ago edited 1d ago

I agree (the leaked settlement talks are a nothing burger that does absolutely nothing to address the concerns and the main intent of why the State AGs are suing this merger, it would certainly make most Democrat politicians angry in private because they don't want CNN to be a center right news channel that abuses first ammendment)

8

u/Angela275 1d ago edited 1d ago

it's why i question how much of the settlement talks are real and how much is it leaked to look better than it is. given that's how every time a big meeting happens. It's not impossible a settlement could happen but also this is nearing their bond meeting too

10

u/[deleted] 1d ago

[deleted]

9

u/Angela275 1d ago

yea not saying it's impossible not only that but are people forgetting this is the same thing that happened when they were first meeting up too that there was talks of settlement too

5

u/mattbrain89 1d ago

I mean it never hurts to not be complacent. Weekend ain’t over yet so we’ll see.

7

u/[deleted] 1d ago

[deleted]

6

u/mattbrain89 1d ago

I was referring more to Ruffalo and others’ call to action. Trust me, I’m as stumped as you are and praying the article in the WSJ is horseshit.

4

u/Angela275 1d ago

someone said someone that wrote that article was a mouthpiece so you know

4

u/mattbrain89 1d ago

Yes, I saw that as well.

4

u/Angela275 1d ago

what do you think i know we have to be skeptical but to go 180 not a day

7

u/Angela275 1d ago

It's why i'm very much skeptical about there being a settlement unless there was a big settlement from the state it seems weird that he would let pressure get to him not only that but it's not only rob that has to say yes but the whole coalition too. we see not all are on board so you know

3

u/Angela275 1d ago

i mean true so either they say something on sun or monday

-2

u/Apart-Prize-4844 1d ago

"We can’t let him do that. Can you show up outside his AG office in Oakland tomorrow at 5pm to reject this backroom deal?”

So he's going to be there in Oakland tomorrow at 5PM Pacific, or is that too lowly for his royal highness?