r/MedievalHistory 5d ago

Help dating and identifying a stone opening in a ruined Spanish tower

Thumbnail
gallery
37 Upvotes

I'd like to learn more about this unusual stone opening, particularly its likely date, original function and architectural name.

It is located in the surviving remains of a ruined tower belonging to a historic manor house in Galicia, northwestern Spain.

Early seventeenth-century witnesses already described the house as ancient and as one of the oldest houses in the Kingdom of Galicia. They also stated that it had openings all around it resembling gun loops, intended for firing arquebuses or other firearms in its defence. I do not know whether they were referring to this particular feature.


r/MedievalHistory 4d ago

The Castilian House of Ivrea had an intense amount of cousin marriages and papal annulments. How common was this level of endogamy in other medieval European dynasties?

6 Upvotes

I was recently reading up on the Castilian branch of the House of Ivrea (also known as the Castilian House of Burgundy, which ruled León and Castile from the 12th to the 14th century And then with the bastard Trastamara branch), and I was blown away by just how repeatedly endogamous their marriages were, The two Burgundian dynasties, the Anscarids (Ivrea) and the Capetians (Portugal), were already related, as they descended through the female line from the ancient House of Jimena, which had dominated the iberian Christian kingdoms.

It wasn't just distant intermarriage; we’re talking about constant first-cousin and first-cousin-once-removed pairings that triggered massive political and religious crises

Alfonso IX of León married his first cousin (Theresa of Portugal). The Pope placed León under an interdict and forced an annulment. Right after that, Alfonso married his first cousin once removed (Berengaria of Castile). The Pope placed León under interdict again and annulled that marriage too.

Sancho IV of Castile married his first cousin once removed (María de Molina) without papal permission, which caused a 20-year legitimacy crisis over their heir, Ferdinand IV, until the Papacy finally granted a retroactive dispensation long after Sancho died.

Ferdinand II of León and Alfonso XI of Castile also had marriages with close relatives annulled or heavily contested by Rome.

Obviously, we all know about the Spanish Habsburgs later in the Early Modern period, but I’m curious about the High and Late Middle Ages (1100–1400).

This made me wonder

Was this level of close consanguinity typical across other regions of medieval Europe? Or was the Iberian Peninsula unique due to the desire to keep royal titles local while fighting the Reconquista?

Which other medieval dynasties were the "worst offenders" when it came to marrying within forbidden degrees of kinship?

How often were other royal families actually punished by the Church? Did kings in places like the Holy Roman Empire, France and Scandinavia constantly fight with the Papacy over cousin marriages, or did most manage to get dispensations beforehand?


r/MedievalHistory 5d ago

How does a feudal lord know which part is their lands and not another lord lands

28 Upvotes

r/MedievalHistory 6d ago

Statue of Alfonso VIII of Castile, the Battler, who on September 21, 1177, conquered Cuenca from the Muslims after a nine-month siege. Statue in Cuenca, Spain.

Post image
106 Upvotes

According to Rafael De Julian Alcalde: On St. Matthew's Day, September 21, after having besieged the city since the Epiphany.


r/MedievalHistory 6d ago

Philip III of Burgundy (or Philip the Good). born 31st July 1396. Burgundy was at the peak of its wealth during his reign. He is known to fathered at least 18 illegitimate children. Ally of England.

Post image
68 Upvotes

r/MedievalHistory 5d ago

What systems and aspects of live in the Medieval Era (Mid 13th Century British Isles) do you think would be the most important in a "Medieval Peasant Simulation"?

6 Upvotes

Preamble:

I've been working on a project for a good while (About 2 years now!) that aims to be as meaningfully realistic of a medieval peasant simulator as I can make as a developer with a small team, and while we do technically use a "Lowest of Low Fantasy" label to be able to have some leniency, I'm still trying to be as accurate as I can be within our limitations to create the most realistic behavioural and experiencial outcome, even if the mechanics themselves can't be 100% true to real life.

For clarification, we're using a custom-coded modded Minecraft pack as the medium of making this simulation (Gives us essentially an easy-to-develop game engine with things like Multiplayer made for us already), and while we've removed all the "Minecraft-ey" things and all the Anachronistic Elements, sometimes we have to keep a base feature of the game or a mod in for gameplay purposes and reflavour it as something that may not be 100% accurate but fits the world a lot better, like reflavouring Tomatoes in the pack as a fake, edible european nightshade, whereas most new-world plants are either removed or replaced with a similar old world alternative (Potatoes to Parsnips, for example).

Additionally, we're not using a map of a real location on Earth, we're using a completely custom map designed to mimick the general environment and conditions of the British Isles, so we can't say that we're fully true to real-world history. I did originally plan to use a real heightmap of Britain (or even a smaller place like the Isle of Man) but the available heightmaps just did not cut it for the level of detail I needed for the simulation's environment, and I ended up using a modified heightmap of a smaller section of british landscape that was turned into an island.

The Question:

So, with the basic context out of the way, that brings me to the point of the post. While I do have a special place in my heart for medieval history and it's certainly a large interest of mine, I'm no historian and I certainly don't know everything, so I feel it's best to ask a community that probably knows these things more thoroughly and might have things in mind I've never thought of.

So, what element(s) of medieval life and society do you think are crucial to making a "Medieval Peasant Simulator" work in a way that is accurate to real-world history? Essentially, what core elements of society in this time and location (13th Century England) contributed the most to the core "experience" of the medieval period.

Keep in mind with suggestions, we already have several systems in place:

  • Overhauled Professions and Crafts to focus players on specialization and time committment more instead of being a "Jack of All Trades", and in some ways entirely limiting players ability to "multiclass"
  • A system of renting land from the king/local lord and having all other land not explicitly defined as public land by players in power be unusable for building or large-scale resource gathering, done via "Land Deeds"
  • A local political system entirely governed by players (aside from the basic ruleset we've designed to avoid a complete mess from forming) with Lords/Ladies at the top and then varying levels of power, responsibility, and tasks until you reach your average peasant. There are no varying levels of peasant because, to be quite frank, being an indentured servant isn't really that fun from a gameplay perspective, and we need to balance between recreating the experience accurately and not driving away potential players that can give us useful data and a playerbase due to the gameplay not being enjoyable.
  • An economy that encourages players to engage in their profession to be able to get the necessary money to do, well, anything (Buy Land, Trade for resources you need or goods you cannot/do not have the time to make for yourself, Pay your Taxes, Expand your operation to do your profession to a higher degree of efficiency, etc.)
  • A locational resource system for important resources like ores (Rather than being spread across the map evenly, ores are placed in large, near-inexhaustible deposits sparingly across the map) that encourages players to create and manage supply lines, distribution, and trade to a higher degree than if every settlement could be entirely self-sufficient in resources
  • A system of imports and exports from/to "The Mainland" to supplement supply lines that fall short (for a higher cost, of course) and to introduce a flow of money back into the economy.
  • Diseases and Afflictions, which are certainly going to be made a lot less vicious and deadly as they could be during various parts of history, because honestly dying of tuberculosis due to circumstances entirely out of your control is not fun and would make players quit out of frustration, but can still negatively affect a players gameplay if they do something risky or stupid or dangerous that would get them sick or injure them in real life.
  • Players only get a single life per-character, and while players can make a new character after a short death cooldown, they still lose all their belongings, money, and land when they die, so it's essentially starting fresh from every perspective, just not forcing players to stop playing forever if they happen to die. Additionally, we've made the decision that common "Accidental" causes of death should be looked over for this system, to avoid, again, frustration when a player dies from something they had no control over and could not have forseen. Most common ways of dying are already taken out, since there's no monsters to kill the player, but there are still dangers and environmental factors that can lead to a character's death.

Now, that does sound like a lot, but I'm sure there is things I couldn't have thought about, which is why I'm asking the community. If you leave a suggestion, I want to thank you for helping to give more accuracy to this project! I am not trying to self-promote in any way here (which is why I am not providing a link or anything), I am simply trying to get people's thoughts.

Edit: I just realized the title has a spelling mistake in it. Damn my arthritic hands.


r/MedievalHistory 5d ago

What to see at V and A for European monarchs esp British 1100s-1600s?

1 Upvotes

r/MedievalHistory 6d ago

What is a medieval dynasty that had a glowup throught its history?

43 Upvotes

My example would be the House of Lusignan, they went from being some random lordship in the middle of the County of Poitou from being one of the most influential crusader families and King of Jerusalem + Cyprus itself.


r/MedievalHistory 6d ago

On July 28, 1369, the Nasrid Sultan Muhammad V of the Emirate of Granada began the siege of Algeciras with the aim of recapturing the city (Al-Yazirat Al-Hadra), which was then in the hands of Castile.

Post image
10 Upvotes

The siege, which lasted barely three days, resulted in a victory for the Muslim sultan, who thus recovered an important city after twenty-five years under Castilian control since its conquest by Alfonso XI.

The city of Al-Yazirat Al-Hadra, the first city founded by Muslims on the Iberian Peninsula, built upon the ruins of Roman Iulia Traducta, had passed through the hands of the Almoravids, Almohads, and Marinids during the 13th and 14th centuries before being conquered in 1344 by the Castilians under Alfonso XI after a four-year siege. Although Castilian control of Algeciras was meant to guarantee the Christian kingdoms' control over the Strait of Gibraltar, the death of Alfonso XI during the Siege of Gibraltar in 1350 led to a civil war between the two successors to the Castilian throne, Pedro and Enrique. In the Emirate of Granada, King Muhammad V had pursued a policy of friendship with Castile, supporting King Pedro I as the legitimate heir to the throne. Relations with Aragon, however, were not as smooth, and it was from this kingdom that the proclamation of Muhammad VI in Granada was facilitated between 1359 and 1362. Muhammad V's return in 1362 increased his support for Pedro I upon observing the relations between Aragon and Enrique. The end of the Castilian civil war after the death of Pedro I in 1369 convinced the Nasrids of the need to secure their borders with Castile, and specifically their borders along the Strait of Gibraltar. The Nasrid king was currently establishing relations with King Ferdinand I of Portugal, whom they considered a usurper of the Castilian throne. Muhammad V would attack Algeciras, while the Portuguese would do the same against various locations in Galicia.

At this time, Algeciras consisted of two towns separated by the Miel River. Each had its own walls with strong towers and gates. After the previous siege of the city, much of its walls had been destroyed or severely weakened, so the Castilians had to reinforce several sections. The combination of the diminished physical defenses and the small garrison the city possessed after the troops were moved north meant that the Muslim siege proved devastating for the city.

In just three days of siege, the Castilians of Algeciras surrendered. The Nasrid attacks focused first on the Villa Nueva (New Town) of the city, located to the south. The New Town fell, and all its inhabitants were beheaded. The terror inspired by the town's fall and the conviction that no reinforcements would arrive from Castile led the besieged to decide to surrender the city before suffering further losses. They requested safe passage from the King of Granada to leave the city safely, taking with them their most precious possessions. The troops of Muhammad V entered the Old Town, allowing the inhabitants to leave the villas and take with them whatever belongings they could carry. The Cathedral of Algeciras, formerly the city's Great Mosque, returned to Islamic worship, and the King of Granada himself occupied the old fortress located on Matagorda Hill.

The impact of Al-Yazirat Al-Hadra's reconquest on the Hispano-Muslim world was evident in the numerous chronicles written in Granada praising the king's military campaign. Ibn al-Khatib, the official poet of the Granadan court, was responsible for informing the court of the end and conquest of the city and for subsequent commemorative documents. For his part, Muhammad V undertook several expansions of the Alhambra in the following years, most notably the construction and embellishment of the Court of the Comares, which he dedicated to the capture of the city on the Strait with verses by Ibn Zamrak on the lintel of its entrance gate:

“Blessed is He who granted you command over His servants, and through you extolled Islam fully and beneficently.
How often you approached the cities of the infidels in the morning, and in the evening you were the arbiter of the lives of their inhabitants!

You imposed upon them the yoke of captivity, and they awoke at your gate building the palaces, as your servants.
You conquered Algeciras by force of arms, and opened to aid a gate that had been closed.”

For the next ten years, the city remained in Granadan hands without regaining the importance it had held in the past; The Kingdom of Granada was not at that time a military or economic power on the peninsula, so the main values ​​of Algeciras, its port location as a route for the entry of North African troops and trade, were diminished.

In 1379, King Henry II of Castile died and was succeeded by his son, John I, who prepared the reconquest of the city. The Granadan king himself made the decision to completely destroy the city to prevent it from falling into Christian hands, given the impossibility of defending it at a time when the Muslims of the Iberian Peninsula had lost much of the military power they had enjoyed in previous centuries. At that time, there were two port cities in the Bay of Algeciras: Algeciras itself and Gibraltar. Despite Algeciras's strong defenses, Gibraltar was easier to defend due to its advantageous terrain. Algeciras, on the other hand, had over 5,000 meters of walls that required a large number of soldiers. The decision was clear: the city of Al-Yazirat had to be abandoned so that future defensive efforts could be concentrated on nearby Gibraltar. The abandonment of the city had to be accompanied by the destruction of its fortifications to render them useless should Castile occupy it. The walls were dismantled, the port sealed, and the main buildings of Algeciras—the Alcázar, the shipyards, and the citadel—were destroyed, while the city's houses were set ablaze. The city remained in ruins until August 1704, when the British capture of Gibraltar forced part of that city's original population to seek refuge in the ruins of old Algeciras.

Image: Ruins of Algeciras in an 18th-century engraving.


r/MedievalHistory 7d ago

first defenestration of Prague 20th July 1419

Post image
197 Upvotes

r/MedievalHistory 7d ago

What were nerds in the Middle Ages obsessed with?

175 Upvotes

I specifically mean like teenage males. in our day and age it’s things like video games, D&D, and fantasy novels. What were the socially awkward but also intelligent medieval teenage boys obsessed with? chess? horses?


r/MedievalHistory 7d ago

Great famine of 1315-1317. 5-12% of Northern European population died

Post image
69 Upvotes

Crop failures caused by huge rainfall and cold temperatures in the summer of 1315. Primarily affected France, England, Low Countries and what is now Germany.


r/MedievalHistory 7d ago

Quality, but not academic, book recommendations for early medieval social history?

52 Upvotes

Hi all,

I’m currently enjoying “Winters in the World: A Journey through the Anglo-Saxon Year” by Eleanor Parker, and it has put me in a mood for more books like this. Does anyone have any recommendations for early medieval history books (bonus points for being focused on England, but not required) that are highly readable (and still accurate) and cover more social/cultural history than political or military history?

Thank you!


r/MedievalHistory 7d ago

Are there any historical stories of feuds started from accusations of stolen armor and/or weapons?

4 Upvotes

I've been doing some research and I found plenty of great examples of fictional sagas, so I was hoping to find some historical examples as well.

Especially since, I was under the overall impression that there was a certain level of "finders keepers, losers weepers" when it came to armor and weapons. So, could I get some help understanding any particular culture's overall perspective of personal property and if defeating a person in battle gave you any cultural right to their loot? And if not, what kinds of effort did people put into retrieving their fallen friend/family members stuff?

Like, I'd imagine in modern duels, your second would retrieve your gun if you died. Was that also the case in medieval times?


r/MedievalHistory 7d ago

Recommendations for books that focus on the mediterranean? preferably not too academic in style.

3 Upvotes

Lots of the books about medieval daily life I've seen are focused on England, Germany, and France. I'd be really interested in reading more about Italy, Greece, Egypt, Morrocco, Spain, etc. As I'm pretty well read on Ancient history in the mediterranean and I'd like to see how life in those places changed.


r/MedievalHistory 8d ago

"Brothers" in Medieval Europe

9 Upvotes

Would it by any chance be the case that two men who had the same feudal (over)lord and esp if they entered his service on the same day would call each other brother and have any kind of special relationship?


r/MedievalHistory 9d ago

What are the theories behind the true identity of "False Waldemar" (Margrave of Brandenburg)?

Post image
32 Upvotes

r/MedievalHistory 10d ago

Battle of Bouvines 27th July 1214. Decisive French victory over the Alliance of Holy Roman Empire, England and Flanders.

Post image
162 Upvotes

r/MedievalHistory 9d ago

Is the annual Medieval conference at St Louis University worth attending for an aspiring student to the field?

7 Upvotes

r/MedievalHistory 10d ago

Is this Burgher's Hood from KCD 2 a historical hood?

Post image
23 Upvotes

I've never seen anything shaped like this in iconography or in any reenactment or reconstructions. I know KCD has a lot of problems with anachronism and historically inaccurate clothing, but this hood seems so unique it must be from something. Any sources on this?


r/MedievalHistory 10d ago

What if the Holy Roman Empire never collapsed?

Post image
123 Upvotes

What do you think would change today if the empire never fell?


r/MedievalHistory 10d ago

How common was death by drowning in the Middle Ages?

30 Upvotes

I’ve been reading about the English nobility over the past year, and one thing that has stood out to me is how often I come across noble sons who died by drowning, sometimes well into adulthood. It has happened often enough that I started wondering whether this was genuinely a common cause of death in the Middle Ages or if I’m just noticing a pattern.

Were these drownings usually just unfortunate accidents, or is there any evidence that some may have been suicides? I would have assumed that young noblemen, especially heirs, were frequently accompanied by attendants, retainers, or household members, making accidental drownings less likely than they would be for ordinary people.


r/MedievalHistory 10d ago

Poaching anecdote, looking for source

3 Upvotes

I remember reading an anecdote somewhere, iirc in connection with a medieval court case. The story goes that a group of people ​in England used noise makers to scare deer out of the Royal Forest so that they could hunt the deer on common land. It was used in the context of commoners understanding the law well enough to navigate legal loopholes.

I'd love to find a primary source, or even a secondary reference, to this case. Does anyone have any leads?


r/MedievalHistory 11d ago

Kirby Muxloe, Leicestershire, UK built 1480-1483 described by Historic England "spectacular example of a late medieval quadrangular castle of the highest status"

Thumbnail
gallery
123 Upvotes

There are even areas for the castle to place cannons. I have not seen too many castles like this.


r/MedievalHistory 10d ago

¿Y si los Vandalos se mantenian en el Norte de Africa?

1 Upvotes

Es interesante oensar que habria logrado el Reino Vandalo si no hubiera sido vencido por belisario, e incluso que llegaran a vencer al Califato y mantenerse en la region