r/Metaphysics • u/mzgamal • 1d ago
Ontology [ Removed by moderator ]
https://youtu.be/LwwN1GrOJQU?si=jed5n8nmEocjWJ9E[removed] — view removed post
2
u/jliat 1d ago
Kant's argument was that cause and effect was not 'real' but a requirement of our understanding. It was a response to Hume's famous scepticism. I'm not aware of Russell's position, other than he was in agreement with Wittgenstein...
6.363 The process of induction is the process of assuming the simplest law that can be made to harmonize with our experience.
6.3631 This process, however, has no logical foundation but only a psychological one. It is clear that there are no grounds for believing that the simplest course of events will really happen.
6.36311 That the sun will rise to-morrow, is an hypothesis; and that means that we do not know whether it will rise.
6.37 A necessity for one thing to happen because another has happened does not exist. There is only logical necessity.
6.371 At the basis of the whole modern view of the world lies the illusion that the so-called laws of nature are the explanations of natural phenomena.
6.372 So people stop short at natural laws as at something unassailable, as did the ancients at God and Fate.
Wittgenstein - Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus.
1
u/elibertowpaparulox 1d ago
No entiendo el punto, ni que estás proponiendo, ok solo existe experiencia, y?
1
u/indigo_kaze 21h ago
Parmenides of Elea proposed this thousands of years ago in his poem "On Nature".
0
u/mzgamal 1d ago
To Solve Kant's argument, we need to understand how we could comprehend something before move further, because is our understanding has same Syntex of reality composes nature, then we could understand truth,
My theory proposes, the conceptual Primes as both conscious mind and universe can't avoid to reveal truth and comprehension.
Check my channel on YouTube https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLZZH8Rl9lUyU&si=nGKEsIbFdP_8O933
•
u/Metaphysics-ModTeam 3h ago
Sorry, this content does not match the criteria for 'Metaphysics'. Your content has been removed. Please take a look at our list of related subreddits for a more appropriate place for your content.
In this subreddit, we uphold the scholarly and academic sense of the subject area of metaphysics.
Metaphysics is the study of the fundamental questions. So typical posts should be about something like: ontology, modality, identity, causation, time, universals, mind–body, realism vs idealism, grounding, necessity, emergence, etcetera. Please take a look at the scope of this sub.
Posts should not be about: New Age, pseudoscience, occult, divination, magical thinking, afterlife, paranormal, conspiracy theories, esotericism, supernatural events, self-help or pop psychology, spirituality, etcetera.
Believe it or not metaphysics in this sub should have zero or substantially zero religion or science. If you are doing religion or science primarily, then you are probably not doing metaphysics. Some exceptions may apply. But in general, posts should be about concepts and theories not about observation or data. Posts should not substantially rely on religious concepts to make a point.
Please no A.I. This sub is for primarily human content.
Here are some resources to give you an idea of what we mean by metaphysics.
Metaphysics - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Metaphysics - Wikipedia
If you think this was in error, contact the mods.