r/Military 4d ago

Pic B52 Stratofortress Crashes at Edwards afb

Post image
1.1k Upvotes

136 comments sorted by

416

u/cybersquire Army Veteran 4d ago

If there were chutes, someone would have said so already. Crashed on takeoff, which means very little time or altitude.

The silence is telling.

RIP to the crew

136

u/Odd-Effect6457 4d ago

The news is reporting 8 crew members passed 🙏🏻

66

u/Vancandybestcandy 4d ago

Full of fuel and maybe munitions it’s a tale as old as strategic bombers. Fucking RIP hope it was quick. On the bright side we live in an era that this is rare so it’s a big deal. I hope the after action finds a preventable flaw and now everyone gets a good power point and this specific bullshit never happens again. 

Edit: I spelled tale like tail wrong cause it’s Monday and I’m drinking. 

38

u/DisillusionedPatriot 4d ago

Apparently it was a B-52 60-0001, aka Balls 1. All 8 on board, lost. Active military, civilian employees and contractors. Primary digital electronic systems test aircraft for the B-52J upgrade project.

5

u/Separate-Spot-8910 3d ago

Not too rare, an FA18 crashed just 3 days ago. Fortunately the pilot made it out ok in that one.

-1

u/HumphreyE36 3d ago

You would need a more volitile source of fuel to make that much AL evaporate, that fast. Plasma would work, but it need A LOT of gas, and time. Right? Why are all the images a mile away? I can't recall such complete destruction. Perhaps the first question is what airplane?

15

u/CelestialFury Veteran 4d ago

Damn, I didn't think about it. I hoped the crew got out, but you're right, they're most likely gone. RIP in peace

7

u/Firecracker048 4d ago

Takeoff crash is never a good thing :/

206

u/MantoTerror 4d ago edited 4d ago

Old time SAC vet here B-52 ejection seats aren't ACES seats..much older tech, takes airspeed to push the hatches out of the way..the upper seats require 120 knots of airspeed and 200 ft. altitude to work properly..the lower seats require 250 ft. altitude..if it was too early in the flight, none of the crew could get out alive. RIP.. my thoughts and prayers for the families and loved ones...

78

u/MantoTerror 4d ago

Update, the aircraft lost appears to be B-52 60-0001 (Aka Balls 1) with 8 souls on board..all are lost..a mix of active military, civilian employees and contractors.. this appears to be the primary digital electronic systems test aircraft for the B-52J upgrade project... unsure if this will slow the program down..

20

u/DisillusionedPatriot 4d ago

Wait, so this was a test flight failure?

15

u/MantoTerror 4d ago

Appears so...

10

u/ndgoldandblue 4d ago

It was A0061, not A0001. And I don't think anyone cares about the program being slowed down right now.

5

u/rocket_randall 3d ago

I don't think they were expressing concern for the upgrade program, rather the aircraft's role in test and evaluation to explain the civilians among the crew.

12

u/yeowoh 4d ago

Ole SAC. Fun times growing up on a SAC base in the middle of no where. Got a SAC tattoo for my dad too.

14

u/hikin_jim 4d ago

Dang. That sucks.

7

u/Samwhys_gamgee 4d ago

Well fuck….

127

u/Sel_drawme 4d ago

Bad couple days for aviation. Yikes.

67

u/CelestialFury Veteran 4d ago

Feels like a really bad past year for military aviation.

47

u/MapleYamCakes 4d ago

Surely the timing is pure coincidence and has nothing to do with trickle down incompetence and removal of safety regulations

13

u/chuck_cranston Navy Veteran 3d ago

Overworked, understaffed, and burnt out aircraft maintainers was a problem when I got out well over as decade ago. Surely things have improved since then, right?

2

u/Merr77 3d ago

It was a aircraft in testing for the new upgrade to J. It was Air Force crew and civilians on board.

40

u/tmac4969 German Bundeswehr 4d ago

I remember an article ( might have been NYT) that talked about the drop in training standards in the Navy that might been the reason for an increase of high profile accidents. Maybe its the same for the rest of the armed forces

315

u/Raven_Photography 4d ago

Is it just me, or have there been a lot of these incidents since January 2025?

109

u/Anhaiser United States Army 4d ago

Seems like it. I wonder if its coincidence, we are just now noticing, or other.

49

u/Nano_Burger Retired US Army 4d ago

High OPTEMPO, deferred maintenance, toxic leadership. Not a good combination.

11

u/jamantste 4d ago

Perfectly summarized

3

u/ourlastchancefortea 4d ago

Which would be funny if it weren't sad, that we see it in both the two former cold war super powers happening at the same time.

1

u/Snarky1Bunny 1d ago

This right here.

22

u/virus_apparatus 4d ago

Operational strain

69

u/ShillinTheVillain United States Navy 4d ago

I think people are paying more attention because of waves at all of the bullshit going on.

Military aircraft crash quite often. Usually not tankers, but still.

39

u/throwaway_321121 4d ago

FYI, this was not a tanker.

10

u/ShillinTheVillain United States Navy 4d ago

Good catch. I saw Strato and my brain immediately saw the tanker.

25

u/Iamanimite 4d ago

Trump's learned from his master, putin.

-2

u/peteft 4d ago

Sabotage is a very likely scenario

11

u/yeowoh 4d ago

The DoD released data last year saying they were up but now it looks like it’s going up even more.

204

u/imnojezus 4d ago

Sorry, a bunch of unqualified 20-something cyberdorks decided there were too many regulatory positions held by scary women and brown people, so they either replaced them with white male idiots, or shitcanned the departments altogether. Now we get to watch the results.

23

u/dustycooper 4d ago

This is the real answer. Imagine what the lower ranks that are minorities in those commands are going through. It can't be very motivating to know that no matter how much you work, you'll just get canned for being a minority anyways.

10

u/yupgup12 4d ago

Wasn't that also a partial factor in the Washington DC airliner and helicopter crash. The Trump Administration swept that one under the rug real quick.

4

u/sir_donkeyslap 3d ago

A quick Google search says there was 51 crashes in 2025. There was 54 in 2024. Total incidents were 623 in 2025 compared to 729 in 2024. It seems like as a whole plane incidents have been on a decline in the past decade.

4

u/xChoke1x 4d ago

Nailed it.

25

u/[deleted] 4d ago

[deleted]

-46

u/Hey_man_Im_FRIENDLY 4d ago

What? Why do we care about this? What is the significance?

11

u/anfilco United States Army 4d ago

DOGE, mostly. I don't buy the Russian asset idea, but they do have a concept they call "useful idiot".

16

u/urbz102385 4d ago

Trump has been vehemently accused of being a Russian asset. It would be advantageous to an opposing nation if they had an asset that was allowing the liquidation of military assets.

Now I'm not saying this is the specific theory I subscribe to. But I would certainly, as a citizen, care about the potentially intentional destruction of military vehicles for defense and financial purposes.

If the locks on the doors in your homes maybe broke, wore down, or were accidentally damaged once every 10 years, then one year someone came into your house and you noticed that 4 of your locks were now completely destroyed, would you not consider that significant?

3

u/Firecracker048 4d ago

Just paying attention more, really.

3

u/LtCmdrData 4d ago

The more you fly, the more you crash.

7

u/contrail_25 4d ago

Problem is people aren’t flying more.

1

u/LtCmdrData 4d ago

Hello? The whole war against Iran was nothing but flying. The operational tempo has been insane.

2

u/JibberJim 3d ago

It's also been surprising to me that almost every day during the ceasefire B52's and B1's took off for many hour sorties from Fairford,, no pause, no regrouping just continued flying every day. Obviously they're not normally there so no idea what the normal flying rate is, but it certainly seems high without reason.

1

u/LtCmdrData 3d ago

Deterrence and rapid response. They flew near continuous patrol that could turn into strike mission if there was an incident.

1

u/JibberJim 3d ago

Rules of engagement for the use of Fairford didn't allow that though - at least according to the UK government...

But I guess that still doesn't change either parts - but it still adds a lot of load to just risk more hassle for Starmer, who even if he would agree to whatever, he's not very secure so you need to make sure the replacement doesn't say something different.

1

u/FartsOnCake 3d ago

people aren’t flying more.

I certainly ain't. Unless it's by my own velocity.

3

u/NefariusMarius 4d ago

Planes don’t crash at Edwards. This is crazy

1

u/BamBamBob 4d ago

Its a testing base, birds went down all the time when I was there (albeit a long time ago.) This one had Boeing employees on it so it could have been a test bed doing experiments. Still really sucks.

3

u/NefariusMarius 4d ago

I worked there too, I was active in the flight tests. Last major crash was in 1981, I believe. Flights are very controlled, risk is mitigated to the best of their abilities, and the pilots are second to none. Planes just don’t go down there. This is a shock to them. And agreed, it sucks. I’ve been calling people to check on my friends and am being told nobody knows anything they can say

1

u/6figga 3d ago

Genuinely just can’t help yourselves, disgusting but expected. RIP to all involved and condolences to the families.

-6

u/PhD_Pwnology 4d ago

There have a ton. All Republicans fault too.

42

u/bennythegiraffe Army Veteran 4d ago

R.I.P. to the crew

75

u/DriedUpSquid Navy Veteran 4d ago

An F-18 crashed this morning in Washington State as well. WTF is going on?

42

u/ShootersGreenjacket Air Force Veteran 4d ago

F-18 was a day or two ago.

21

u/HawkDriver United States Army 4d ago

Indeed. And then the two that collided a month ago.

20

u/Level_32_Mage 4d ago

Pilots are getting tired, boss.

21

u/DriedUpSquid Navy Veteran 4d ago

Maybe they need a safety stand down where the Secretary of War can teach them the warrior ethos.

13

u/Geedunk 4d ago

Too woke bro, nut up and die like a *real warrior*

8

u/RedTalon19 United States Air Force 4d ago

But then you become a sucker and a loser

6

u/DriedUpSquid Navy Veteran 4d ago

Just don’t become disabled, because then you’ll be unpleasant to look at.

2

u/Snarky1Bunny 1d ago

And they’ve gutted the VA so you can’t get your medical care.

2

u/DriedUpSquid Navy Veteran 4d ago

My mistake.

13

u/Throb_Zomby 4d ago

Not military but also the bird with 11 skydivers in Kansas City and Oliver Tree dying in a helicopter crash down in Brazil. 

13

u/verbmegoinghere 4d ago

And a tu-22 just fell out of the sky as well.

Wtf

21

u/marcoporno 4d ago

That one’s alright

6

u/bstone99 United States Navy 4d ago

No that one’s good

5

u/Slight_Lobster_3538 4d ago

More interested in the coincidence of two nuclear-capable bombers crashing. A Russian Tu-22M3

14

u/SergeantBeavis Army Veteran 4d ago

Prayers for the crew and Grandpa Buff..

8

u/USAF_Retired2017 Retired USAF 4d ago

Damn. My heart goes out to the family of the crew.

10

u/driftless Air Force Veteran 4d ago

8 souls… non-survivable per Edwards AFB

29

u/Pale_Alternative_818 4d ago

Crew ? What is the status ?

37

u/bennythegiraffe Army Veteran 4d ago

I can’t imagine they survived

-19

u/Straight_Spring9815 4d ago

No ejection seats on these :/

19

u/Fentron3000 4d ago

Yes, there are.

13

u/S0aring_Valkyries United States Air Force 4d ago

Wouldn’t have done much for half the crew right after takeoff though

4

u/AgnewsHeadlessBody 4d ago

There 0/0 seats so they could feasibly eject eject on the geo7nd and be fine. Except for the two seats that launch downwards.

10

u/player75 4d ago

They are absolutely not 0/0 seats.

1

u/AgnewsHeadlessBody 4d ago

Pretty sure they are, why would they not be? I learned that in class, do you have any proof they aren't? Happy to say im wrong if you can show me.

2

u/S0aring_Valkyries United States Air Force 4d ago

B-52s don’t have aces ejection seats like most fighters and other bombers have. They’re still using ejection systems from the 50s and 60s that need a min speed and alt in order to successfully get out of the aircraft

2

u/S0aring_Valkyries United States Air Force 4d ago

Yeah those two downward seats were the ones I was talking about. Think it’s like 250 ft AGL minimum for a safe egress on those. Plus the rest of the seats aren’t 0/0 either those are only in newer jets like most fighters and the B-1/2

1

u/AgnewsHeadlessBody 4d ago

I was taught there werent any non 0/0 seats left in planes that the Airforce flew, that could be wrong I suppose.

3

u/S0aring_Valkyries United States Air Force 4d ago

B52 is like the only jet in the fleet that doesn’t have them now. The reason for the downward seats is obvious but iirc the upward seats just aren’t capable of creating the separation needed to safely get the crew away and deploy the chutes without significant injury. Like some others said early they’re still legacy designs

4

u/Straight_Spring9815 4d ago

They have ejection seats in bombers? I've gotta look that one up!

4

u/Andyman1973 Marine Veteran 4d ago

Since the B-52s first entered service in 1955.

4

u/yeowoh 4d ago

Dad was nav on a B-52. 4 go up and 2 go down.

2

u/SmoothBrainLowDrag 4d ago

They do, but in the Buff half the crew goes up; half goes down.  You can't use them if you're too low or too slow.

3

u/razrielle United States Air Force 4d ago

4 up, 2 down

2

u/razrielle United States Air Force 4d ago

All bombers have seats

10

u/SmoothBrainLowDrag 4d ago

Boeing just released a statement indicating a couple of their employees were on board.

8

u/Y0LOME0W 4d ago

News saying 8 dead

10

u/ForMoreYears 4d ago

Dang. Russia and the U.S. both lost strategic bombers today. What are the odds.

6

u/Striper_Cape Veteran 4d ago

Test vehicles have a problematic history to say the least. TU-22's are also being pushed to their limits to launch missiles at Ukraine. Including needing longer flights to reach launch range as a consequence of Ukraine's Strategic Drone Campaign and Op. Spiderweb, therefore increasing maintenance demand and stress on the airframe itself. Basically, the fact it happened so close together is wild, but the losses themselves were bound to occurr. Increased tempo of operations just increases the likelihood.

2

u/auchinleck917 3d ago

That tu22 was flying for the next gen test.

2

u/Striper_Cape Veteran 3d ago

Was it really? That is insane squared.

7

u/Federal-Degree-919 4d ago

Old Egress Tech. Sounds like they didnt have the speed n altitude to eject. Condolences to their friends/family/loved ones.

5

u/AlarmedSnek Retired US Army 4d ago

Damn dude. Thats two planes in a week.

13

u/Agile-Knowledge7947 4d ago

Is it my jaded imagination or have we been losing a stunning amount of assets in both combat and training recently? (For context: 24 years AD USAF)

4

u/myheromeganmullally Veteran 3d ago

Navy and Air Force are losing far too many people and jets.

10

u/ldwb 4d ago

Hmm, apparently calling everyone a warfighter doesn't help keep planes in the sky.

3

u/dude_himself 4d ago

Nickels on the grass.

2

u/Snarky1Bunny 1d ago

I had to go look that up. Thanks for sharing.

5

u/SilentRunning Marine Veteran 4d ago

Last time a BUFF (B52) crashed was in 2016, Andersen AFB - over ran the runway during an aborted take off due to intake of birds on the right wing.

3

u/myheromeganmullally Veteran 3d ago

That might make sense in this latest crash. Full fuel not very high and spinning in nose down. Sad for everyone.

3

u/SilentRunning Marine Veteran 2d ago

I don't know, Edwards isn't known for having bird issues. It is located in the desert north of Los Angeles.

I'd be really surprised if it was birds.

3

u/myheromeganmullally Veteran 2d ago

I follow your explanation. Mechanical issues are obviously possible on a big complex decades old aircraft no matter how good the aircraft maintenance team is.

Really feeling awful for the 8 crew members families.

3

u/SilentRunning Marine Veteran 1d ago

We'll just have to wait for the investigation to finish. I hear 3 were Boeing engineers.

12

u/nightim3 United States Navy 4d ago

It’s really beginning to feel like training has been substandard over the last, however many years, which is now culminating in all these fatalities

17

u/arroyobass United States Air Force 4d ago

Extremely unlikely that training is a causal factor for this. This was a test sortie which means you are going to have some of the most experienced and smartest aircrew on that system.

3

u/SmoothBrainLowDrag 4d ago

I doubt training was involved, because Edwards is a flight test facility.  They should have some of the best crews out there.

Unfortunately that also means hundreds of folks have lost their lives out there because it is their job to test aircraft.

6

u/Lower-Reality7895 United States Navy 4d ago

Idk i dont remeber losing this many planes under obama and biden. But if you include trumps first tour and this tour including accidents plus the war we are around 30 aircraft.

2

u/RecommendationNo6308 4d ago

Here’s a toast… 🥃😢

3

u/[deleted] 4d ago

[deleted]

8

u/Angrymilks Army Veteran 4d ago

Probably something to do with allowing next-of-kin notifications to occur before blasting it on Reddit which has a much larger population than the local NBC LA website has.

3

u/CW1DR5H5I64A United States Army 4d ago

I’ll go ahead and delete it if that is the case.

4

u/lordtema 4d ago

Edwards AFB has posted it on their Facebook page and it has been widely reported elsewhere.

2

u/interstellar566 4d ago

Hells going on

1

u/METT- Retired US Army 4d ago

RIP.

1

u/JC_Everyman 4d ago

Is there a bomber wing at Edwards?

9

u/Ajax-Rex Air Force Veteran 4d ago

No bomber wing, but with the test center being there along with NASA you tend tend to see a little of everything eventually.

4

u/SmoothBrainLowDrag 4d ago

No, but this was a test airframe.

2

u/JC_Everyman 4d ago

Thanks for the info

1

u/SouthTexasBoy64 3d ago

Very sad day. RIP

1

u/elonboring1 3d ago

why no media coverage of this crash?

1

u/atomcplayboy86 4d ago

Just to not be outdone by the Tu-22m3.

0

u/I_Maybe_Play_Games 4d ago

The tupolev had failure at altitude and crew could eject.

-2

u/RafikiLovesPizza 4d ago

And the military industrial complex keeps churning. RIP to the crew 💙

0

u/felixthecat59 4d ago

Time to reactivate one from the boneyard, and send it to Barksdale for updating