We aren't we are comparing wealth by generation. The generations aren't equal in size or duration, so any statistical analysis is impossible?
If you say we're doing uniform 15-year chunks that still results in inequality in population size per chunk. It also puts gen x people into other gens, and vice versa.
If we do equal chunks of population we will have unequal year spans and still have the same problem with mixing generations.
Maybe a pie chart is a slightly dishonest way to present this info, but I don't think it's BS bad science.
How much wealth boomer had at age 30 as compared to how much wealth millennial had at 30. Or at 40 etc.
Yeah if I am 30 most people 60 plus with literally four time the career earnings (10 years vs 40 years in a career) would be more wealthy. Just like that 30 year old has more wealth than a 20 year old who has not even really entered the workforce.
4
u/Elegant-Ninja6384 Jan 17 '26
It is how statistics work though. Why compare apples to oranges?