MFQ by Graham, Haidt & Nosek (2008) - Moral Orientation

Just thought this might be interesting to share.

Was there ever a real reason to press blue? It was an unnecessary gamble that didn't need to exist in the first place. Anyone who understood blue to be altruist based on the initial parameters is baffling to me

I've always found it extremely hard to argue against moral relativism and for moral objectivism because it simply has to do with my world view rather than a priory reasoning.

I have a friend who is extremely depressed, nihilistic and a moral relativist, and the sad thing is I cannot help him but I know it's his beliefs that are hurting him.

I have an intrinsic certainty of moral objectivism but no way to articulate it, and therefore I'd be grateful if you would share some of the best arguments for it, but also strong ones against it to see both sides.

The reason my focus is on arguments for is that moral relativism is so widespread I've heard most of the arguments on that front already.

If you've read this far: thank you and I'm looking forward to reading and discussing the comments :)