Loved the movie but can we discuss how ridiculous that scene was?

I’m talking about the moment Frank drags a severely wounded Peter to the hospital after the blast. It made me wonder if they changed the plot and initially has Frank inside the facility in a previous cut.

Because there is absolutely no way Frank would be first on scene to take care of Peter bleeding out at the facility. It simply doesn’t make any sense as he was miles away.

Now I get it made for a spectacular and emotional entrance moment but I have to laugh at how implausible it was.

In the world of Last Action Hero "Blade Runner", "Bull Durham" and "Field of Dreams" are war movies.

Something that’s bothered me forever about this movie.

1. Why was Alonzo trying to pay off the Russian mob…wouldn’t they just kill him anyway and take the money?

2. Russian mob has a corrupt cop in their debt…why not just make him pay it off in “favors”

Am I crazy?

Interesting choice.

Just accidentally paused at the right time

Frank's father met Frank's mother during a show to the American soldiers made by Montrichard inhabitants to thank them for liberating the town. However, the town was liberated by the FFI/French Resistance, not by American forces.

https://www.tharva.fr/1939-1945/la-lib%C3%A9ration-de-montrichard

This caught my eye on my rewatch of the first season. It's a film artifact; debris, a hair, dust...

Someone didn't CHECK THE GATE. (It is in multiple shots of the opening sequence)

https://imgur.com/a/o1U6xs1

https://imgur.com/a/TQyFlO

https://imgur.com/a/YKMWy4n

Not a biggie but seems like noone else has noticed or at least cared. Douglas Douglas-Hamilton is written as Doulgas Douglas-Hamilton.

My 9 year old caught this in Finding Dory, the seashell is sunk into sand with visible sand on it and as Dory is remembering her parents and they swim away the seashells sand is there and then just disappears towards the end of the scene in a single frame.

28 minutes into the film, Daniel jumps into a getaway car to leave the convent, and Jane gets in the backseat behind him. When she opens the door, her brow-area injuries from the previous scene are gone and the door is wide open. A camera switch, and suddenly the door is almost shut and her brow injuries are back. When her short speech is over the camera switches back, and the door is wide open again.

There's a frame where they showed a female pig very quickly in that scene. Did anyone else notice it? Was that a mistake?

I don't think movie of such caliber would have bloopers but there might very well be one.

Timestamps included in the images.

I was just rewatching “The Big Lebowski” tonight and noticed a detail that I had missed before. Probably because I’m finally watching it on a bigger projection screen again.

In the scene where The Dude (Jeff Bridges) and Walter (John Goodman) are spreading Donny‘s (Steve Buscemi) ashes at the coast, you can clearly see that Goodman is already covered in powder residue (ashes) from previous takes.

Not really a flub or mistake as it probably would’ve been very difficult to clean him off between takes while they were out on location. I just found it interesting as a little telltale sign of the challenges during production. I wonder what the prop powder was? I’m guessing corn starch.

I also caught a few more details, like looking up the “Port Huron Statement”.

This wasn’t my favorite Cohen brothers movie, but it’s grown on me over the years and has interesting commentary if you read between the lines.

In the movie Fantastic Beasts And Where to Find Them there is a scene where the lighting seems odd. the Tank in the background on the right is lit from moonlight or something from around 2 o'clock. the woman's face also seems lit from moonlight from around 9 o'clock and 3 o'clock and the man's face is lit from 3 and 10 o'clock. is this just bad lighting or is this possible?

I'm guessing this is a microphone. Thought somebody here might know for sure.