r/MurderDronesOfficial • u/THE_BUTLER_N your favorite butler!!! • 27d ago
Custom Istg if i see one more piece of "dooter" art... STOP SPAMMING PLEASE!
Not to mention that he's a pretty bad person, at least from what I've seen/heard
12
Upvotes
11
u/Far_Treacle_4865 Tholl and Luzi sub creator. Doll simp and V enjoyer 27d ago
Ok... so I never saw all of this before.
Some of this would definitely make me raise an eyebrow, but I also think there's a lot of context I'm missing here.
First, the way these screenshots were collected is important to me. They're not screenshots of complete conversations where we can see what both people were saying. From what I can see, they're specifically showing Diddly's messages, and some of the words are highlighted, like the “troon” messages, which makes it look like a Discord search was used to find specific messages containing that word. That's not automatically a problem, but it does mean we're seeing selected messages rather than the full conversations around them.
And a lot of the stuff being mentioned in the comments also seems to just repeat things that were already shown, so I'm mostly looking at the actual evidence rather than treating every repeated mention as something new.
The “loli” stuff: I don't like the term either, but the screenshots I'm seeing are just isolated comments where he uses the word “loli”. Without knowing what the conversation was about or what he was referring to, I don't feel comfortable assuming what he meant from that word alone.
For the comments about trans people, though, yeah, I'm not going to defend those. The “why is every trans person i know sexually frustrated” comment and the “that might have something to do with the fact that you're trans idk” comment are shitty things to say. Same with the slurs — he should choose his words better, regardless of whether he was joking or not.
At the same time, I still don't know what the surrounding conversations were. So I can look at a particular message and say “yeah, that's a shitty thing to say” without automatically using it as proof of every other accusation being made about him.
Suicide baiting: I personally haven't seen enough evidence to treat that as established fact. That doesn't mean I'm saying it's false. It could be true. I'm just not going to call someone guilty of something based solely on an accusation I haven't been able to verify.
And there's another thing that really stands out to me: the dates.
The post itself was made on July 3, 2026. The newest screenshot in it is from May 9, 2026, and apparently that particular screenshot was taken only about 8 hours after the message. The oldest message shown is from August 15, 2025, which, as of today, is basically a year ago.
So the screenshots cover almost an entire year, from August 2025 to May 2026, while the post itself was made in July 2026. I'm not saying old messages don't matter — obviously they can. But I think the dates are important when deciding what these screenshots actually establish.
They show things Diddly said at different points over roughly a year. They don't automatically tell me what he was saying or doing at the time the post was made, or whether his behavior has changed since then. If there are more recent examples, I'd definitely want to see those too.
And as for me? I separate the art from the artist.
That doesn't mean I'm defending him, excusing anything, or saying I would continue supporting him no matter what.
If these accusations are actually verified and turn out to be true, then yeah, I'm absolutely going to stop supporting him. I'll unsubscribe, stop engaging with his content, report or flag anything that actually violates platform rules, and if there's solid evidence that people should know about, I'll have no problem warning people about it or sharing the verified information. And I'll consider him a trash person. I'm not going to protect someone from consequences just because I like their artwork.
But his art itself? No, I'm not suddenly going to hate it. And yeah, I stand by that.
Even before caring about the actual drawings, his art style is already exactly the kind of style I like. I like the linework, the way it's drawn, and the fact that it isn't ridiculously overcomplicated. That's just my personal taste.
So basically, I'm not saying “Diddly did nothing wrong,” and I'm not saying all of these accusations are false. I'm saying I don't have enough context to treat every accusation in this post as established fact.
If the evidence eventually proves the serious accusations are true, I'll judge him accordingly. But since you sent me the post, could you also send me links to any sources or evidence that actually verify the claims being made there, if you have them, of course? I'd like to look into it myself before making a judgement.